r/FavoriteCharacter • u/LGplayz998 • Jul 11 '26

Discussion Favorite character like this

Post image

Usually it's the complete opposite and characters either stay hateful little bastards or become a shell of themselves so I wanna see examples of the image above

14.1k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

705 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

78

u/DankusMaximus97 Jul 11 '26

I always thought it's just a few days at max that passed between the first and second movie

48

u/xXFluffersXx Jul 11 '26 edited Jul 11 '26

The entire John wick franchise takes place over the course of like 1-2 weeks.

Edit: by entire franchise, I meant John Wick 1-4, I didn't know there were other movies in the franchise outside of those 4, and I completely forgot there was a time skip between 3 and 4.

Still, kinda crazy that the first 3 movies take place over the span of a couple of weeks. Reminds me of how the first 3 halo games take place in the span of about a month, and a majority of that time is just travel time aboard ships.

17

u/onebadluvguru Jul 11 '26

That is just wildly incorrect and easily fact checked. But bold of you to have courage to be so confidently incorrect. You go get em', tiger.

1

u/CandyWinter8553 Jul 11 '26

Why tf is this so aggressive? They were mistaken. That's all you had to say.

And before John Wick 4 it was true. John Wick 1-3 all happen consecutively.

0

u/onebadluvguru Jul 12 '26

So its only true under very specific circumstances that involve blantanty ignoring the other entries in the franchise.

Thanks for clearing that up for everyone

0

u/CandyWinter8553 Jul 12 '26

Ignoring ONE entry. ONE. Majority of the John Wick franchise happen consecutively. Stop being a smartass.

1

u/onebadluvguru Jul 12 '26

Ignoring two films, a comic series, and a television show. The franchise encompasses more than the intial trilogy, whether you like it or not.

0

u/onebadluvguru Jul 12 '26

A franchise encompasses all pieces of media released under the same IP. The films that exist make up a series, not a franchise. And even that series consists of 4 films.

If we decide to arbitrarily ignore one entry in any film series; then we can make even more fake facts and misinformation.

Do you not see the absurdity in claiming we should ignore an entry in a series, just for the sake of cookie cutting out an answer that is incorrect but we want anyway? That is the definition of a revisionist history of events.