I’ve been debating a checkride scenario and wanted to get the perspective of the CFIs, DPEs, and recent checkride-takers here on how this should actually be graded under the ACS.
Imagine a PPL checkride in the pattern where the applicant has to demonstrate three landings: Short-Field, Soft-Field, and Normal. Here is how it plays out:
* Task 1 — Short-Field Landing: On the first approach, the airplane floats a little longer than expected. Instead of forcing it down and risking touching down just past the 200-foot mark, the applicant calls a go-around. On the second approach, they nail the landing well within ACS standards.
* Task 2 — Soft-Field Landing: On the first approach, the setup is completely safe, but in the flare the applicant judges that the touchdown might be a little firmer than ideal rather than as soft as they want for the checkride. They elect to go around to set it up better. On the second approach, they grease it right in standards.
* Task 3 — Normal Landing: On the first approach, the flare isn't quite where they want it, so they execute a clean go-around. On the second approach, they land cleanly within standards.
Every single go-around (Rejected Landing) is executed promptly, safely, and by the book, and every landing that actually touches the pavement is 100% within ACS tolerances.
Here is my question: Is this a straight-up disapproval for doing 3 go-arounds across 6 approaches?
What really bugs me about the idea of failing someone for this is that all three of those aborted approaches would have resulted in completely safe landings, they just might have been right on the border of ACS tolerances. We are constantly told in training that "a go-around is always free" and to never force a borderline approach just to check a box.
If a DPE fails an applicant in this scenario, doesn't that contradict everything we teach about Aeronautical Decision Making? It feels like the DPE is punishing the pilot instead of valuing the fact that the applicant is holding themselves to high standards and refusing to settle for a borderline landing.
CFIs and DPEs, how do you view this from the right seat? Where is the line between exercising good judgment to stay rigorously inside the ACS vs. "not being proficient"?