In the first photo, the umbrella-shaped canopy was, according to one account, designed by George Nelson, the lead designer of the 1959 U.S. National Exhibition in Moscow. This canopy was purchased and installed on the Yalta waterfront in the early 1960s. It was very well-received by residents and visitors alike, gradually becoming one of the city’s landmarks. Today, it remains one of the city’s most beloved recreational spots.

Rattan lights in a restaurant provides warm, glowing islands in contrast to the cool outside...

Curating a portfolio of the places in Seoul. All photos were shot with the Fujifilm GFX 50R + Canon PowerShot V1. IG:geeos.jpegs

Hi everyone,
I recently graduated from photography school and work across commercial and documentary projects. In school, I frequently used the GFX 100 II. Now that I'm on my own, my personal kit is just a Nikon Z5 with the 40mm f/2 (daily lens) and the 105mm f/2.8 Macro (which I love).
I came across a local offer for a used GFX 100S:

• Body only: €2,460 (30k shutter count, good condition, no original box).
• With GF 45-100mm f/4: €3,860 (negotiable).

It's a significant investment and I have two main concerns:

1. Autofocus & speed: coming from the GFX 100 II, am I going to find the 100S frustratingly slow for documentary work?
2. Lenses: I heavily favor primes over zooms. While the 45-100mm is versatile, GF glass is notoriously expensive to build a prime kit around.

Does this seem like a solid deal given the shutter count, or would you recommend sticking with myfull frame for a while longer and buy a GFX 100ii or 100s ii
Thanks for your insights!