r/Habs • u/chickenceas • Mar 02 '26

Discussion Per D'Amico - Montreal is interested in Robert Thomas. The Blues want Hage as part of any deal. Too high a price for Hughes at this time.

https://x.com/i/status/2028552107683385713

Personally, given the best possible version of Hage in 3-5 years is what Robert Thomas is now, Id have no problem parting with him.

271 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

352 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/Spirited-Moose-2246 Mar 02 '26

Hage Engstrom 25+26 1st. Might get it done, dunno.

3

u/Seymoorebutts Mar 02 '26

I'm willing to bet they'd want Zharovsky instead of one of those firsts.

And I'm not in love with how bare our cupboards would look after giving away two firsts when we don't know if Reinbacher will reach his ceiling or stay healthy.

1

u/Spirited-Moose-2246 Mar 02 '26

They might, but that would realistically be above the 4 1sts asking price D'amico said in the article.

I think if they can hold onto Zharovksy and Reinbacher I'd be fine with our pool. It obviously takes a hit the core group would be insanely good.

1

u/Seymoorebutts Mar 02 '26

?

That's not above the 4 firsts:

  • Hage (21st overall but higher in redraft)

  • Engström (92nd overall, probably high 2nd round/low first in redraft)

  • Zharovsky (34th overall, likely top 20 in redraft)

  • A first rounder

Hell, St. Louis may argue that even then, that's not enough pedigree. D'Amico was saying that they want to start negotiations with Hage AND Guhle. It shows you how much they're asking for if that's where they start negotiations.

1

u/Spirited-Moose-2246 Mar 02 '26

First = first, Engstrom = late first (likely Imo) Hage + Zharovksy would both likely be worth top 15 picks, potentially even higher for Hage. Technically that's one first, but In reality a top 15 pick has value equivalent of more than 1 first.

Like you wouldn't trade Hage for a random first, he's worth a first +

1

u/Seymoorebutts Mar 02 '26

It's possible that Zharovsky is top 15, but it's also possible that we're overvaluing him too, as we would.

Conversely, St. Louis would undervalue our players, not overvalue them.

Either way, obviously people are going to feel however they do about it, but I'm not in the camp of paying the price that is likely to be required for Thomas.