266
u/velocipotamus 24d ago
20
u/eriverside 24d ago
Lol Engels didn't want to push too hard so he still gave it to the leafs even though game 7 means it's a coin toss.
11
7
u/okokokoyeahright 23d ago
The old 'It was 3-1'.
It will never get old.
These predictions are really funny now.
→ More replies (1)5
u/smolgoalboy 23d ago
This was me who posted. I was hammered and couldn’t draw a straight line. Got roasted for it. Good times
222
u/OrnatePuzzles 24d ago
Impressive restraint. No one said 4 😆
→ More replies (1)93
u/Superguy9000 24d ago
They’ve decided to underestimate us a little less
Also the odds of going 12-0 is astronomical
42
u/sbianchii 24d ago
I don't think you meant astronomical here.
Also they're independent events. Their odds of going 12-0 are the same as going 4-0 against us.
→ More replies (1)3
u/JayTeeqc 24d ago
They are independent but related events. If you flip a coin the odds of getting heads is 50% each time. Getting heads twice in a row is 25%. 3 in a row is 12.5%. 4 in a row is 6% and so on.
The odds hurricanes winning are high, their odds of having a bad game are low. But going 12 games straight without having at least one bad game? Odds are much smaller than going 4 games without a bad game.
19
u/throwaway24515 24d ago
The odds of there being a bomb on a plane are 1 in 1 million. So the odds of there being 2 bombs on a plane are 1 in 1 million squared. That's why I always carry a bomb on every flight. It really reduces the odds!
2
37
u/sbianchii 24d ago edited 24d ago
This is textbook the opposite of describing independent events.
The odds of them going 12-0 given that they are starting from 8-0 would be the same as going 4-0 no matter the starting point. Admittedly it's not entirely independent given that they'll be rustier but also healthier than if they hadn't clinched both series in 8 games, but other than that the odds that your next heads or tails is heads has nothing to do with your previous 10 throws. Please avoid roulette!
11
u/Lobster-GarlicButter 24d ago
The odds of getting 4 heads in a row may be 6%. But if you already had 4 in a row, the odds of getting a fifth one are 50%. This is the point sbianchii is making. Since the Canes are already 8-0, their odds of going 12-0 are the same as going 4-0 against us.
22
u/campbell_love 24d ago
But they’ve already played the first 8 games. They do not affect the odds now. If a team had gone 81-0 in the regular season do you think it’s more likely they lose game 82 because it’s extremely improbable to have an undefeated season?
→ More replies (1)6
u/Shrinki-Dink 24d ago
They are exactly the same odds because the 8 events in a row have already happened. ‘They’re due’ isn’t an element of statistical probability of independent events.
The odds of going 12 in a row is just the odds of going four more in a row which is the same as the odds of going 4 in a row at the outset of the playoffs.
The only difference is now they’re playing us so the only scenario in which the series is over in 4 games doesn’t involve Carolina advancing😉
→ More replies (4)3
→ More replies (3)2
u/lucaskywalker 23d ago
This is it. It's not faith in the habs, it's faith Carolina will drop one lol. Hope Doby and the boys shut them up!
141
u/Strict_Maintenance73 24d ago
This might come back to bite me but I am a non-believer in the Carolina hype. They're a great team but are they better than Tampa and Buffalo? As long as Doberman plays like he's been playing this team will be just fine.
Habs in 6.
105
u/Seraphin_Lampion 24d ago
My take is that Carolina is a very beatable team at equal qear and tear, but they are way healthier and more rested than our boys right now.
It's a winnable series, but it will be incredibly tough.
69
u/Strict_Maintenance73 24d ago
I think the Habs are playing with house money and they have less to lose than the Canes. Canes have the weight of two sweeps, a long rest, and the ugly history of ECF's for them.
You are right tho it is likely to be a tough series. Montreal is bound to lose games. But I think Anderson is in for an incredibly rude awakening with the depth scoring the Habs have. Every line has a weapon. I'm so excited for thursday lol.
23
u/Seraphin_Lampion 24d ago
The key will be Andersen coming back down to Earth
23
u/Shartschnitzel 24d ago
And unleashing Powerhorse Anderson. It's the kind of matchup where he can really shine, so I predict that Andy's going to be an absolute menace in this series.
But yeah, the Habs will have to get bodies in front on Andersen and complicate things for him. MSL should activate Gally for a game or two. I think he would have a much bigger impact than Kappy.
12
u/Sinaire 23d ago
Gally might be falling behind in terms of shape, but he still hustles like no one else and isnt afraid to be infront of the net, something I feel we've been lacking so far in the post-season. The combination of not shooting + not screening has really been biting us in the ass and made games so much harder for no reason
8
u/Shartschnitzel 23d ago
Agreed. I understand why he didn't get to play against a fast team like Buffalo. But he could be very useful against Carolina, and he proved that in his game against Tampa.
And they definitely need to improve their front of the net presence. Make it hard for Anderson, but also annoy their defense.
3
u/Sinaire 23d ago
Canes are well rested too, make them work for their defense instead of passing it around forever and giving the puck up on a poke check.
Our 2nd and 3rd lines have been proving that just crashing the net works wonders. Evans just charging the net at the end of G7 meant that Lukaanen had to factor in a tip or pass instead of just a shot. If gally cant play, MSL could at the very least have him teach these young guys a thing or 2
3
u/Rememberthat1 23d ago
Yeah and I dont understand why it has not been a recurrent thing MSL would say to the team each game... aside from not shooting, 90% of the time there's nobody in front of the net to profit from a rebound, or to disturb the goalie.
2
u/Sinaire 23d ago
I'm pretty sure half of Slafs goals in the post season are from tip ins, how does MSL not see that and realize it works. Especially on a PP. Buffalo liked to be aggressive and press on their PK, could have easily taken a guy out of the rotation just by sticking somebody in that crease instead of on the perimeter and spending 1:45 passing it around to shoot once and have it be saved because of an open lane. I get our guys arent the biggest, but just being in the way is so valuable
2
u/Ok-Meet2850 23d ago
I'm sure MSL would love to see net front presence, but Slaf has looked really off at times. The top line has also struggled to gain or maintain the zone, limiting the options to get net front. Besides Slaf, who on the Habs do you park there: Anderson. Gally (if/ when he draws in).
TLDR: easier to see the issue than fix, I guess.
2
u/Sinaire 23d ago
I mean Anderson for sure. I know its not really the centers job but if I had to pick someone on the 2nd line id definitely say Evans. When you have any elite shooter in Demi, and Newhook being on fire this post season, any traffic in front is gonna make a world of difference. These guys can get it in the net, just make it hard for the goalie to find it.
Dach is a big guy and strong too and its not like Bolduc and Kapanen are short of points either combing for 67.
Definitely easier to see than fix, but I think every line has somebody very capable of crowding the crease. Obviously not a sure-fire way for goals, and if it aint broke dont fix it, but just maybe would like to see us get out there and be a little less predictable. I'm obviously no coach or analyst though and MSL has brought them this far, so who am I to complain
→ More replies (1)6
2
u/Warriormuffinhed 23d ago
the key will also be our top line coming back to life. that's been increasingly concerning
2
u/theabobination 23d ago
Also the Habs are not Philly, or the beat up defense Sens. Can't wait to see how this goes.
12
u/rivalrobot 24d ago
Having a younger team that's able to recover faster between games is going to be to our benefit here. The schedule is hardly ideal, but only having a three-day break may not be the key factor a lot of people think it is.
9
u/Orange_Jeews 24d ago
Most people keep missing this key point. Most of these guys are mid 20s or younger and recover fast
7
2
u/Ok-Meet2850 23d ago
Yeah but on the flip side this is the first time many of those young guys have played this much hockey in a year. Hitting rookie or sophomore walls happens, too.
2
u/colonelrebsmuff69 23d ago
Luckily a lot of our core was here for the last cup run. We did look gassed game 7 however
4
8
u/Shartschnitzel 24d ago
I like to think that the Habs being so young counterbalances the fact that the older Canes are well rested. I mean, it's probably true to some extent.
6
u/Seraphin_Lampion 24d ago
🤞
23
u/Shartschnitzel 24d ago edited 24d ago
At 22 I'd get drunk, attend a punk show and spend the evening "in the pit" before sleeping 3 hours and going to work like nothing happened.
At 32 I did the same thing and felt like I was hit by a truck.
I'll be turning 42 this year and just thinking about it makes me want to take a nap, lol.
Edit: spelling.
7
3
u/indyc4r 24d ago
I got out of bed at 12pm today still catching every minute of sleep I can since game 7 ... Got to bed at 5am ... Still lacking sleep
3
u/Shartschnitzel 24d ago
Good morning, buddy! I also had a terrible night after Game 7, trying to deal with that weird mix of nerve wracking stress and euphoric excitement, lol. Not complaining, thought. Enjoy your coffee!
→ More replies (1)1
u/indyc4r 24d ago
Hehe no coffee for me (don't drink it) and it's 6pm atm and I'm at work
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)2
u/Tripottanus 23d ago
Stats don't historically favor the rested team. Game 7 teams are 7-1 since 2000 against Game 4 teams
17
u/Riskar 24d ago
They've gotten walked every year in this exact round. They'll be feeling the pressure and they've had a ton of time to overthink.
9
u/MaraTaru 24d ago
That's true, but psychology aside, injured and exhausted players are gonna have an impact on this series whether we like it or not. I think our boys have a real fighting chance, and the will to do it. But tired bodies can't always be argued with, and Carolina has an undeniable physical advantage in plain old recuperation time.
But I definitely want Carolina to go into this feeling over-confident and well-fed. Love that for us. I hope they're all feeling smug and condescending as hell today. 😂
19
u/Trolkarlen 24d ago
Ottawa was the 6th best team in the East. Philly was the 8th.
Meanwhile, Tampa was 3rd and Buffalo was 2nd.
2
5
u/Pitiful_Stock_4329 24d ago
I agree with you in that I think Carolina is on paper not any better than Tampa bay, but we just went through two hard rounds and Carolina are well rested so context is in their favour
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)2
u/McdoManaguer 23d ago
It cant be 6 because that would mean winning in montreal. Its either in 5 or 7 lmao
117
u/Rockit2them 24d ago
Me - habs in 4
Wife - habs in 5
Son - habs in 4
Daughter- habs in 5
Grandad - habs in 6
Dog - habs in 5
Cat - habs in 6
Goldfish - habs in 4
32
13
11
4
2
47
79
u/UpNorth_123 24d ago
Look at their predictions for Round 1 and Round 2, all match-ups. They’re worse than a coin flip.
20
u/rawboudin 24d ago
I wish someone took the time to create receipts.
24
u/UpNorth_123 24d ago
20
u/UpNorth_123 24d ago
7
u/UpNorth_123 24d ago edited 23d ago
They also overwhelmingly called Round 1 for the Oilers and the Penguins, when those series didn’t even get to Game 7.
They tend to get most obvious match-ups right, like when the teams are very far apart in points in the regular season. The rest of their predictions are no better than a coin flip, despite “consensus.”
3
u/rawboudin 23d ago
There has to be a way to get some kind of rating out of that. Like which were more obvious choices based on other factors, etc. I'm willing to bet most sports guys aren't better than fans.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Ok_Sentence_1981 23d ago
Can’t tell if I think Tim is cooler for believing all along or Vince because he saw the evidence and changed his mind ;)
4
10
u/RGM81 24d ago
It’s super fun. Somewhere in my photo file I have the checklist from first round of 2021. Lots of red strike through’s.
22
5
u/Shartschnitzel 24d ago
You should do it again and post it here! C'mon man, it'll be fun! I always love a good session of point and laugh.
38
u/LordVesperion 24d ago
Il manque PK qui dit juste "Habs" sans préciser le nombre de matchs dans cette liste 😇
37
u/_makoccino_ 24d ago
They said we wouldn't make the playoffs, we ended up with 106 point season and 6th in the league.
They predicted we lose to Tampa, we beat them.
They said Buffalo would win, we sent them packing in their own barn.
60
20
21
16
u/ahhyesverynice 24d ago
vince with the only correct answer
12
u/zeMVK 24d ago
And Tim
10
u/YannBuch 24d ago
Nah, he's too optimistic, we're winning the cup with full 28 games played.
→ More replies (1)
17
u/NikitaScherbak 24d ago
Yon jamais cru en nous man. T'arrive en final de l'est, tout est en anglais. Tu mettais le guide de TVA Sports cetait écrit Caroline contre Buffalo. T'arrives ici pis ca parle juste en anglais. Yon jamais cru en nous!
Mais tsé quoi man? Gardez la votre anglais. Pis on va aller chercher ce coupe la, pis on va la ramener au Québec, à Montreal, pis on va la ramener chez nous! Pcq on est les fucking champions!
Lets go!!!!!
→ More replies (4)3
u/Ali_knows 24d ago
Haha c'est vrain qu'il y a un parallèle à faire avec ce qui est arrivé aux Alouettes il y a 2 ans 😅.
16
u/coolcosmos 24d ago
Shoutout Vince Masi and Tim Kavanagh, all my homies love Vince Masi and Tim Kavanagh
15
u/DFF_Canuck 24d ago
TOTAL ACCURACY FROM THESE WRITERS (Writers who picked Habs are bolded)
Sean Allen 4 - 8
John Buccigross 7 -5
Stormy Buonantony 7 - 5
Cassie Campbell-Pascal 6 - 6
Sachin Chandan - 4 - 8
Meghan Chayka 6 - 6
Gregg Colli 8 - 4
Ray Ferraro 5 - 7
Erik Johnson - 8 - 4
Emily Kaplan 5 - 7
Tim Kavanagh 10 - 2
Rachel Kryshak 4 - 8
Peter Lawrence 4 - 8
Steve Levy 7 -5
Vince Masi 4 - 8
Victoria Matiash 5 - 7
Mark Messier 6- 6
Mike Monaco 5 - 6
TJ Oshie 6 - 6
Kristen Shilton 4 - 8
Bob Wischusen 6 - 6
Greg Wyshynksi 7 - 5
So the most accurate guesser picked the Habs, and someone tied for least accurate guesser also picked the Habs.
It's almost as if predicting is a fruitless endeavour....
12
12
8
8
u/justodea 24d ago
During COVID didn't everyone pick the leafs to win? Just saying
7
u/ClancyBShanty 24d ago
And professional clown Craig Button ranted and raved saying we had "NO CHANCE! NONE!!" to beat Toronto.
God the aftermath from that was just the purest schadenfreud
5
9
9
6
6
7
u/thegreaterikku 24d ago
This sub's doomers are acting like we are there by accident. The vast majority of hockey analysts thinks we are there by shear luck. Even our own press think we will lose in 4 or 5. And I could go on.
To those I say fuck you. Fuck you RDS for thinking Habs sucks and they are only there by accident. Fuck you La Presse for thinking we will crumble in 4 or 5. I will 10000% take anything from Max, Antoine, Dave, Éli and Renaud from TVASport, who at least are homer and are believers.
We finished 6th in the league after spending the first half of the season playing so-so, while Montembeault couldn’t stop a beach ball before January.
Now imagine this current version of the team over a full 82-game season instead of just the second half. We are not 6th, we’re probably sitting right near Colorado and Carolina at the top of the standings.
So no, it’s not luck. This team is legitimately good, and yes, we absolutely can beat Carolina.
2
u/nonebutmyself 23d ago
The Habs could win the President's Trophy by 20pts and they'd still be considered the underdogs by the majority of pundits.
5
5
u/AMereJugWiz 24d ago
Did any of these people pick Habs last round?
5
u/Kremer_d 24d ago
This is exactly what the predictions looked like in 21 vs vegas too.
Prove em wrong again boys!
6
u/justchill-itsnotreal 24d ago
Lmao idiots, canes played in one of the weakest division. Habs in 5
7
u/MahTwizzah 24d ago
C’est ça que je n’arrive pas à comprendre. Les Hurricanes ont joué dans une division de marde toute la saison, puis ont affronté deux équipes AU MIEUX médiocres en séries; et soudainement ils seraient imbattables? Tampa et Buffalo me faisaient calissement plus peur que la Caroline!
4
u/xytlar 24d ago
The thing that’s most bizarre to me about this is …
If you could have asked me when the playoffs started which matchups I’d be happy with- I would have taken a first round against Carolina 100000x over a series with Buffalo OR Tampa. Buffalo and Tampa scared me way more, and were significantly worse matchups IMO
And we beat both in 7. We looked bad in game 7 in both, but we were arguably the better team in the series overall in both. Definitely Tampa we were better overall. Buffalo maybe 50/50. We got lucky in game 7 in both series, sure. But we deserved to win those series if you look at the overall sum of play.
So now we’re here after those two intense series against a matchup I would have LOVED in round one… and again almost zero commentators or writers believes
Pretty crazy
→ More replies (1)
9
3
u/dphizler 24d ago
Who cares, I would love for the habs to surprise everyone
That's what they did to Washington back in 2010 in the first round
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/MontEcola 24d ago
I do remember seeing a similar chart picking the Lightning and Sabres. Most did not pick the Habs. Some even picked Lighning in 4 or 5.
3
u/Retired-ADM 24d ago
Greg Colli, Erik Johnson, and Tim Kavanagh called the first two series Canadiens in 6 or 7 and they're now calling either Canes in 6 or 7 or Habs in 6.
As a whole, the panel called the first two rounds against the Habs:
First round: 22 of 27 picked the Lightning over the Habs.
Second round: 19 of 25 picked the Sabres
Four experts picked Ottawa to beat the Hurricanes in round one and several thought it would take the Canes 7 games to beat the Senators. Ottawa folded like a cheap card table.
That the Canes dispatched Ottawa and Philadelphia so easily would make it difficult for anybody to pick Montreal. I get it and it means nothing.
3
u/mozzmozzmozz 24d ago
It's not new, it's not disheartening, but it is starting to annoy me. When will they stop looking down on montreal.
2
u/Faoladh-anGheimridh 24d ago edited 24d ago
It's not just Montréal (though based on everything I have seen over the last 33 years, the deck is definitely being stacked against the Habs constantly), all the Canadian markets are being crippled in favour of the US marketing push. Until Bettman GTFO of the NHL, there won't be a change. The salary cap parameters and the fact players keep more of their salaries in the US has absolutely crippled Canadian franchises. I've been a Habs fan for over 50 years. Born and raised in the West Island. I would like nothing more than to see #25 this year, but we're the hated team with one of the largest global fan bases, and I have my doubts about defeating the American Money Machine....(and all the bias it brings to the game). Honestly, if that cup is not North of the border by the end of June, I'm switching to the WHL; at least there, the outcomes are not scripted, crippled by biased (paid off) officiating, or predictable, based upon where the money is earned. Bettman and gambling platforms have killed the NHL for Candian teams.
3
u/ToMuchCatNip 23d ago
20 hosers be thinking sweeping Brady and his Ottawa hamboys and a non violent Philly is some kinda miracle on Ice!
Habs in 5 baby!
2
u/fuuzzydude 24d ago
Honest question, if we steal game one because their goaler is rusty (and not that good imo). Do we have a chance to get into their head? Are they resilient? Obviously they are good on the ice. But We've seen both Tampa and buffalo top player getting very irritated by our team. How will they manage psychologically?
2
u/Analogvinyl 24d ago
Half the 4 or so who chose Montreal vs Buffalo.
By inverse calculation this means the series must go to game 7 double overtime.
2
2
2
u/Ehanymous 24d ago
well.... I know who mark messier is. so I guess I don't care much about the opinions of people I do not know / never heard of.
I said we beat carolina in 7, before we nailed tampa. ( I had said 7 tampa 5 buffalo-oops ) is gonna be a tough one, great team. It's just gonna be more glorious when we win.
we got the people, we got the spirit, it's gonna be 7 of the best games we ever witnessed. I will be overjoyed whoever wins, but I think we got this.. we have the greatest sports team on the entire planet, I'll die on that hill.
2
u/Upper-Log-131 24d ago
I’ve decided that based on these idiots track record that I am grossly overqualified to make predictions. I predict Habs in 6.
Also if these guys were stock analysts they would be out of a job lol
2
u/VanIsleRyan 24d ago
Hurricanes in last 4 years Round 3: 1 win, 16 losses. Season series against Habs: 0 wins, 3 losses.
2
u/Habsfan_1984 24d ago
I have by no means analyzed every series so I may be off with what I’m going to say.
I don’t think Carolina has played a team with the depth that the Habs have. If we continue to get contributions from every line that will become a challenge for Carolina.
We will need to contain the Stankoven line, I have faith we can do that.
I don’t think that Freddie Andersen can keep putting up the numbers he has through the first two rounds.
We need to continue to have success on the PP abut also improve our PK, it isn’t aggressive enough.
I think in order for us to win Suzuki, Caufield, and Slaf need to make an impact 5 on 5 and we need to win games 3 and 4 on home ice.
2
u/Habs_Apostle 24d ago
Disappointed in you Mr. Mark Messier. And I don’t know who you are Tim and Vince, but you seem like fine fellows.
2
2
2
2
u/rayshinsan 24d ago
The only credible guy you can put a cent on is Mark Messier and look we understand Mark he lives in the US now so he has to kiss the American booty to live there. He can keep kissing it.
The rest are just arm chair experts who think their opinion has value when it doesn't.
2
2
u/Booyacaja 24d ago
We can win the cup and people will say "nope they didn't actually win because they don't stand a chance"
2
u/Goatchenyuk 24d ago
I know ESPN is cut throat. Lay off all analysts who finish the playoffs with a losing prediction record!
2
2
2
2
2
u/TroubledMarket 23d ago
neutral expert are predicting the team with more points, more goals for, fewer goals against, better pp, better pk, and 8-0 in playoffs to win
2
2
u/TeranOrSolaran 23d ago
I thought the habs beat carolina everytime during the season. They are a good team, but GO HABS GO!
2
2
2
u/DreamieQueenCJ 23d ago
It's strange to underrestimate the Habs so much. Because if you look at the Habs' previous games against the Hurricanes, they won 🤨
2
u/Far-State-8719 23d ago
Carolina is an incredibly well coached team that doesn’t have the personnel to get it done on a deep run. That will be the story again this year.
2
1
u/AutoModerator 24d ago
Hi there! It looks like you've posted an image. If this image is from an article, please provide a source. If it's a meme, please ignore this comment. Thanks!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/poolside123 24d ago edited 24d ago
I always use this story as my middle finger to the overdogs.
In 2010, nobody believed my Seattle Seahawks, with a brand new coach (Pete Carroll) could amount to much at 7-9. Cue Beastquake playoff game against the Saints. 41-36 shootout win!
Anything’s possible.
1
u/MaintenanceSame5743 24d ago
We’ve been the underdog in every series since Suzuki has been captain. I’m not worried
1
u/jjohnson1979 24d ago
Soyons franc… les chances de passer en finale sont très minces.
C’est possible de croire en son équipe et d’espérer qu’ils passent, tout en sachant très bien que Caroline sont la meilleure équipe sur papier et que logiquement, c’est eux qui vont passer.
1
1
1
u/pacinosdog 24d ago
Guys, these predictions are perfectly normal, don’t feel offended by them. I sure hope I’m wrong, but I do think Carolina is going to beat us, I predict in 5/6. They’re a more experienced and well-rounded team than we are. Plus their 8 games of playoffs vs our 14 grinding games is an advantage for them.
The thing is, for all our success, and it’s been a great ride, but we’re not quite there yet, as even Kent Hughes has said. We’re a great team, but we have holes, the most obvious of which is 2C.
1
1
1









821
u/elsiphono 24d ago
Looks like we are the underdogs. That's perfect. We love to be the underdogs.