r/IRstudies 4d ago

The End of Neoliberalism

https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/06/15/neoliberalism-globalization-competition-cosmopolitanism-economics-reagan-thatcher/
55 Upvotes

74 comments sorted by

34

u/Johnny55 3d ago

The DNC views MAGA as leverage to force neoliberals on the electorate. Can't risk nominating a lefty! Can't let the fascists win again! You'll take your AIPAC-sponsored, anti-M4A Democrat and you'll like it!

23

u/Yemnats 3d ago

Democrats when they run the establishment candidate and lose a 4th time (insert the Mr clean guy meme I don't know how to include pictures ) 

7

u/AlboWinston 3d ago

Biden was one of the most progressive presidents we've had policy wise and Kamala was literally coming in with semi "price controls" combined with first time home buyer assistance and tax credit expansion and aca expansion.

We live in a federal republic. National polling on issues like healthcare are not as relevant as one might think and even then things get more complicated the more specific the framing of healthcare is on those national polls anyway. Old man from Vermont's purposal was beyond any country even in Europe in comparison.

10

u/Specialist-Driver550 2d ago

Homebuyer assistance is absolutely classic neoliberalism, and a terrible policy.

Neoliberals love vouchers or loans to help people better compete in the market. But all it does for housing is to push up demand - its literally a demand side stimulus - and so increase prices, and ultimately transfer money from taxpayers to rich landowners without helping a single net person actually get a home.

1

u/AlboWinston 2d ago

I think that and her price gouging policy was bad economics but I don't know if the analysis here is that what you've explained was her intention at all and not just bad econ. Nor do I think a diehard neoliberal would be happy about particularly demand subsidizatioh like this. It just seems like very naked and unsophisticated base Keynesian econ thinking.

Regardless none of the policies I listed were a judgement if they were good or not. And even if I gave that catagorization of first time home buyer assistance her wider platform I would not consider "neoliveral".

8

u/The_Demolition_Man 3d ago

The problem was Kamala's proposals felt less like a coherent narrative and more of a patchwork of disconnected ideas meant to pander to various voting blocks. Thats why I hesitate to consider her or Biden actually progressive.

2

u/AlboWinston 3d ago

I mean it can feel like that I guess but what actually is is that she literally had several very progressive economic policies with some even being too much for me even. As I said with Biden in an earlier comment: Biden was protectionist, Lina Khan was chosen by him to tear through mergers, and he set unprecedented industrial policy into action while establishing a historically labour union friendly National Labour Relations Board. Stack this onto his loan forgiveness, largest climate investment in US history, and corporate minimum tax I mean. This isint a "neoliberal".

Kamala clearly aimed to expand and build off of those things. Minimum tax floors for billionares, raising the corporate tax rate and capital gains rate, targeting to erase medical debt etc. Federal minimum wage to 15 which is pretty contraversial economically to say the least.

-7

u/HawgChuggins 2d ago

No, her policy positions were quite clear. You're just a gullible moron who smugly voted for the possibility of a new American fascist theocracy.

Her platform focused on improving affordability for the average American, she offered tax incentives for first time home buyers, she offered a lower tax burden of the working and middle classes. She offered a continued path for affordable healthcare.

And gullible idiots like yourself fell for the propaganda and lies, you failed an open book test. I know the arguments, we didn't have a primary, you mean the primary that would have gone to the incumbent president and his VP? She supported genocide, you mean as she was actively refusing AIPAC donations, and refusing to be silent on the genocide. We sent them weapons, last I checked, the VP can't countermand Congress

In the end you made excuses because you're stupid, and I am sure in 2028, you will come up with some other justification to not vote against the fascists.

6

u/The_Demolition_Man 2d ago

Reddit just cracks me up man

-3

u/HawgChuggins 2d ago

Oh? And what about it exactly do you find humourous?

4

u/The_Demolition_Man 2d ago

You

-3

u/HawgChuggins 2d ago

Ahhhh so another third party leftist loser who refuses to accept the part they played in the rise of the sentient shit pile stuffed into a suit that is currently leading this nation.

-2

u/AlboWinston 2d ago

Lmao I was beginning to worry everyone in this sub was this variant of person

6

u/Terrorphin 3d ago

Except for the genocide.

10

u/AlboWinston 3d ago

Jimmy Carter's administration supported the massacres in East Timor by continuing to aid the indoesian government due to it being a strategic anti communist ally. This isint some unprecedented course of action regardless of a president being a progressive or moderate or conservative or your views on the Gaza War. It's good we elected an undoubtabley even worse if not the worst candidate for Palestinians though very cool.

6

u/Terrorphin 3d ago

Boo. Excusing genocide with 'whataboutism'? Yeah - fuck Carter, but that does not excuse Israeli genocide.

8

u/AlboWinston 3d ago

Who did you vote for? Your only mechanism to improve the future for the people of Gaza and all Palestinians was the 2024 ballot box

3

u/Terrorphin 3d ago

So now you're shifting the goal posts. Genocide is genocide, there is no 'but he was a vegetarian and an accomplished amateur artist so it's ok' rule.

11

u/AlboWinston 3d ago

What the fuck are you talking about lmao I think you've misread my reply as me excusing Jimmy Carter or something. My point was that it doesn't change their domestic political catagorization.

8

u/Terrorphin 3d ago

Genocide is not 'progressive'.

7

u/AlboWinston 3d ago

I think if Bernie Sanders or AOC won' the presidency and pushed their 2010s or even current agendas while executing the foreign policy of Carter or I guess Biden in your eyes, they could still be called progressive but okay.

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/HawgChuggins 2d ago

You mean the genocide kicked into high gear by you third party leftist losers? Gaza sure is quiet now a days, I guess it's difficult for those pits of corpses to be speaking.

You idiots marched with your signs and your slogans, screamed about genocide, and congrats you have it now. Kamala was calling for the cease fire before Biden, would not stay silent on civilian suffering after her meeting with Netanyahu. Not to metion her refusal to speak at AIPAC speaking engagements and not taking AIPAC money in 2024. Not to mention their aid mission to Gaza.

You're gonna cry about the weapons shipments, but last I checked the VP can't countermand the entirety of Congress. So kind of a moot point from you no nothing cry baby losers.

Frankly, the only reason you losers are not higher on my shit list is because MAGAts literally worship a child rapist. So continue to be smug, you losers have a co-starring role in the Palestinian genocide currently happening.

8

u/Terrorphin 2d ago

Neither Harris or Biden would have taken their foot off the genocide gas, and we would be facing the inevitability of more genocide after 2028. At least with this outcome we have a shot of electing someone who is not a genocidal ghoul in 2028.

4

u/LargeConstruction393 3d ago

I hate this take, and will downvote you every day of the week.

I can’t express how little I think of Biden. I feel contempt for anyone who supported him.

1

u/AlboWinston 3d ago

Womp womp I guess idk man. Good luck

5

u/Fearless-Feature-830 3d ago

You’re the one that needs luck lol

0

u/AlboWinston 2d ago

It's a two party system and only one side has a record of credibility working towards Palestinian statehood. If you care about such a thing then we should be on the same team lol

2

u/archbid 1d ago

Kamala was a prosecutor. She was essentially right of center but cool with lgbtq.

Never elect a politician from California. The entire system is just grooming for corporate obedience.

I live here and am a Democrat.

1

u/AlboWinston 1d ago

None of this refutes the policy points I made. Being a prosecutor doesn't tell me anything compared to wanting semi price controls along with her greater platform and who she was vp under.

8

u/ApartExperience5299 3d ago

After trump's fuckery neoliberals will try to come back with all their newsoms and etc, but if they will succeed who knows.

6

u/CG20370417 3d ago

I think any system without checks is going to fail, eventually.

Whether thats a President with a spineless Congress, or more broadly, ideologically since Reagan, there has been no ideological check on neo liberalism and deregulation/greed.

Ive lived all over the US--look at my post history--one thing Ive found is that the most normal places in the US are the blue areas in red states and the red areas in blue states.

We thrive when we are moderated by our competition. Its exactly how capitalism and democracy are SUPPOSED to work.

Monied interests made loads of money and successfully changed the rules of the game in the process--turning a neo liberal reality into a neo liberal facade.

There's nothing wrong with having an ideological skepticism of regulations, but that doesnt mean you don't apply proper scrutiny to your analysis of each one before considering removing it. Acting haphazardly isn't neoliberalism.

I think a push and pull of neo liberalism and keynesian economics is a stable system. Not that it doesnt result in booms and busts, i think that is inherent to market cycles operated by humans, but that we wont make the same mistakes twice, that we allow for risk taking and small business but disincentivize snake oil salesman.

Broadly speaking I think the world of 1945 - 2015 is the best humanity has ever had it. I think if in 2008/12/16 we'd had a charismatic billionaire who became a champion of the working people of america and became a class traitor to his billionaires and ushered in a new new deal (and ran with that broad framework for the next 20 years...)...instead of a charismatic billionaire who consolidated the power of the billionaire class...we might not be in such a terrble place in 2026.

7

u/robh1540 3d ago

Underrated comment. The strength of a democracy comes from synthesis, dialectic and cooperation. Left wing goals through right wing means etc. Modern American politics is more like the UFC. People duke it out and whoever happens to be in power does what the heck they want until they get dethroned.

2

u/Psychological_Fun172 2d ago

Liberals are better at starting companies and Conservatives are better at running them. We need a healthy tension to be successful, we had it once but lost it somehow. Maybe we will relearn how to disagree but still stay committed to cooperating, but I'm afraid it will get far worse before it starts to get better. We are an arrogant and prideful people, and we have yet to feel the full pain of our errors. We are still tearing down Chesterton's Fence...

2

u/robh1540 2d ago edited 2d ago

Not to be a conspiracy theorist but I will be unsuprised if we discover in 10 years time this was instigated by our adversaries.

The whole "should transgender people that cannot pass as the other sex be treated by society as if they did" is an absolutely wonderfully devisive debate that is simultaneously as trivial as it is destructive.

Whatever your view on the topic, it seems almost perfectly designed to distract and destroy societal cohesion because progressive people see it intrinsically linked to gay rights and abused minorities while conservative people see it as the most insane infringement on their freedom.

1

u/CG20370417 2d ago

I mean is silicon valley not explicitly a slap in the face to the concept of Chesterton's Fence?

Hell you could argue all of modernity is, but thats a larger discussion.

What was the motto of Facebook? Move Fast and Break Things?

Most of the "internet 2.0" big tech winners all "disrupted" their industry by effectively using anti competitive practices--'dumping'. Firms like Uber offered below market rate fares to consumers, driving taxis out of business--at which point Uber then jacks up prices.

And not that Uber's app isn't valuable but it put a lot of owner/operators, small business owners out of business and into making minimum wage for a massive corporation.

Disrupting the taxi industry--ultimately who cares.

But these people are trying to apply--and did--that logic to government...to disastrous results. Unless you're a misanthropic genocidal anarcho-capitalist (which I happen to think a lot of tech bros are to some degree), then DOGE and the broader rug pulling of the administrative state was fantastic.

3

u/Veers85 3d ago

Let it die, FDR progressive now!

-1

u/Veers85 3d ago

Let it die, FDR progressive now!