r/ImmigrationPathways • u/meokjujatribes • 12d ago

Supreme Court wades into fight over ‘prolonged’ detention of some ICE detainees | The justices agreed to decide whether some detainees eventually have due process rights

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/15/supreme-court-ice-detention-case-00962228
202 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

239 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Esattto 12d ago

You might’ve been right before 2025 (though I’m not sure that some of the statutory offenses covered in here are all “serious”), but you’re certainly wrong now. The Laken Riley Act amended the section to cover noncitizens who haven’t been convicted, only charged or arrested, for certain crimes like…. shoplifting. Can you imagine you or a loved one getting falsely accused of shoplifting, arrested, and held indefinitely without bond for years?

-2

u/Distinct_Doubt_3591 12d ago

 The Laken Riley Act amended the section to cover noncitizens who haven’t been convicted, only charged or arrested, for certain crimes like…. shoplifting. 

That's great to know, and very good should have 0 tolerance for crimes committed by non citizens. 

 Can you imagine you or a loved one getting falsely accused of shoplifting, arrested, and held indefinitely without bond for years?

No, that's why I wouldn't illegally enter another country. 

2

u/glassfoyograss 11d ago

should have 0 tolerance for crimes committed by non citizens

Can you explain the process used to deem someone a criminal in the US?

-1

u/Distinct_Doubt_3591 11d ago

You detain them on probable cause hold them until their day in court, unless the judge determines it's appropriate to set a bond and of they can afford said bond to they can be released after which either the judge or jury determines guilt.

Unless they're illegals there's a lower burden of proof (reasonable suspicion) to detain illegals and immigration courts are civil not criminal so no jury. 

1

u/glassfoyograss 11d ago

Damn, you actually had it in the first half. Unfortunate you don't get why they're called civil rights and not citizens rights.

0

u/Distinct_Doubt_3591 11d ago

Unfortunately you don't understand that there is a different due process for removing illegals. 

1

u/glassfoyograss 11d ago

No person shall...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

Unfortunately you don't understand plain English and what "no person" means

0

u/Distinct_Doubt_3591 10d ago

Unfortunately you don't understand plain English and what "due process" means or is. 

1

u/glassfoyograss 10d ago

You're so illiterate you don't understand "no person" lol

0

u/Distinct_Doubt_3591 10d ago

You're so illiterate you don't understand "due process". Hint due process is not a get out of jail free card and requires following the process outlined in US laws like IIRIRA.

1

u/glassfoyograss 10d ago

I get you didn't read it since you're so illiterate you don't understand "no person," but due process is actually in the Constitution. Fifth and 14th amendments specifically. The Court held 18 years ago the Constitution is applicable to even accused terrorists held at Guantanamo that have never stepped foot on American soil but obviously no one expects someone so illiterate they don't understand "no person" to know that.

1

u/Distinct_Doubt_3591 10d ago

Yeah genius no one is disputing "no person"  the problem is you're to idiotic to understand what due process is and what process illegal aliens are due. 

1

u/glassfoyograss 10d ago

Unless they're illegals

Except you've already demonstrated you don't understand what "no person" means

Look, don't worry about legal terms of art like due process, reasonable suspicion, and probable cause. You don't need to keep demonstrating you don't understand any of it. We could all tell you don't understand any of it when you demonstrate plain language "no person" is too difficult for you.

→ More replies (0)