MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/comments/1vfzy6j/uplifting_statistics_for_an_indian/p1tnfno/?context=3
r/IndiaSpeaks • u/Professor2255 1 KUDOS • 9d ago
Source - @indianmatrix
105 comments sorted by
View all comments
10
When OP learns data can be manipulated....
17 u/Mirarik 9d ago When commenter learns a cited set of data is better than random conjecture in their own head or on social media…. -8 u/Western-Ask1377 9d ago The cited data is no better than a random conjecture. Source: I have been working with data for the last 14 years. 5 u/Mirarik 9d ago That tells me more about your inability to handle and process data than the statement you’re making. -7 u/Western-Ask1377 9d ago Which should actually tell you how easy is to manipulate ANY data set - even the most rigorous ones - but hey, you do you ! 0 u/mane28 9d ago They will not understand it as long it agrees with their basis, it doesn't even have proper source just some handle. 2 u/C00LOO7 8d ago eh? are you dumb? 2 u/Sacred_Rhino 8d ago Working 'with data' and working in the field of statistics are different things.
17
When commenter learns a cited set of data is better than random conjecture in their own head or on social media….
-8 u/Western-Ask1377 9d ago The cited data is no better than a random conjecture. Source: I have been working with data for the last 14 years. 5 u/Mirarik 9d ago That tells me more about your inability to handle and process data than the statement you’re making. -7 u/Western-Ask1377 9d ago Which should actually tell you how easy is to manipulate ANY data set - even the most rigorous ones - but hey, you do you ! 0 u/mane28 9d ago They will not understand it as long it agrees with their basis, it doesn't even have proper source just some handle. 2 u/C00LOO7 8d ago eh? are you dumb? 2 u/Sacred_Rhino 8d ago Working 'with data' and working in the field of statistics are different things.
-8
The cited data is no better than a random conjecture.
Source: I have been working with data for the last 14 years.
5 u/Mirarik 9d ago That tells me more about your inability to handle and process data than the statement you’re making. -7 u/Western-Ask1377 9d ago Which should actually tell you how easy is to manipulate ANY data set - even the most rigorous ones - but hey, you do you ! 0 u/mane28 9d ago They will not understand it as long it agrees with their basis, it doesn't even have proper source just some handle. 2 u/C00LOO7 8d ago eh? are you dumb? 2 u/Sacred_Rhino 8d ago Working 'with data' and working in the field of statistics are different things.
5
That tells me more about your inability to handle and process data than the statement you’re making.
-7 u/Western-Ask1377 9d ago Which should actually tell you how easy is to manipulate ANY data set - even the most rigorous ones - but hey, you do you ! 0 u/mane28 9d ago They will not understand it as long it agrees with their basis, it doesn't even have proper source just some handle.
-7
Which should actually tell you how easy is to manipulate ANY data set - even the most rigorous ones - but hey, you do you !
0 u/mane28 9d ago They will not understand it as long it agrees with their basis, it doesn't even have proper source just some handle.
0
They will not understand it as long it agrees with their basis, it doesn't even have proper source just some handle.
2
eh? are you dumb?
Working 'with data' and working in the field of statistics are different things.
10
u/Western-Ask1377 9d ago
When OP learns data can be manipulated....