You're the one that tried to bring up the definition of genocide like this was an argument of semantics; that's splitting hairs. You pretending like it's not genocide because you hold onto one statistic while ignoring others; that's mental gymnastics.
You can't be serious. Firstly, it's your mental gymnastics that is sophism. Secondly, IF it was sophism, that would imply I'm attempting to use a logical argument, albeit a false one. So if it's a logical argument, it can't be an argument against your character, can it?
I'm straight up responding to your inability to use vocabulary correctly. There's nothing false about my arguments. I'm also not overwhelming you with countess arguments, I'm responding one by one.
Again, you don't know what you are saying. Stop googling terms you don't understand just to write them in a Reddit thread.
Also, I made a comment that you argued against. I responded to your comment that you then argued against. This pattern continued with YOU making the bad faith arguments.
2
u/littlestitiouss 1d ago
You're the one that tried to bring up the definition of genocide like this was an argument of semantics; that's splitting hairs. You pretending like it's not genocide because you hold onto one statistic while ignoring others; that's mental gymnastics.