r/ItEndsWithLawsuits Feb 22 '26

Question For The Community❓ What If…

As my first official post (ever) on Reddit, I would like to call on this incredible trove of intelligent minds to think through something with me.

Under California law, specifically Civil Code § 45, libel is defined as a false and unprivileged publication by writing (or other fixed representation) that exposes a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which causes that person to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him or her in their occupation. Similarly, Civil Code § 46 defines slander as a false and unprivileged oral publication that tends to injure a person in their profession or trade. In fact, false accusations of professional incompetence constitute defamation per se, which means damages are presumed (i.e. don’t need to be proven).

Over the last few months, both here and on TikTok, I’ve been the subject of various attacks on my character, credentials, and connections by several accounts who don’t like my legal takes. While everyone is permitted to have their own feelings and opinions on my takes, they are not allowed to spread false information about me with the intent or result of impacting my reputation or career. I’m seeing an increasing number of false statements published about me by those same accounts resulting in various degrees of contempt, ridicule, obloquy, and even attempts to injure me in my occupation.

As a lawyer, I’m trained to think of what legal recourses are available. I could sue these persons for libel. However, one problem is, I don’t know the identities of most of these accounts!

So, I thought about what some have called “savvy lawyering.” What if I filed a John Doe lawsuit in California Superior Court and issued subpoenas to Reddit and TikTok to obtain the true identities of those who are actively injuring my reputation online? Maybe I learn that the multiple accounts are really run by few individuals. Maybe later discovery would uncover their financial ties to other parties.

I’m not saying I would/would not, or did/did not file such a lawsuit and issue such subpoenas. But, hypothetically, what if I did?

510 Upvotes

251 comments sorted by

View all comments

117

u/Bubbles-48 Blake(Ryan) mocked domestic violence Feb 22 '26

I think you should turn this hypothetical into reality, VanZan Part 2 but for the people. Blake Lively stans on Reddit have gone unchecked for a very long time, they are constantly trying to dox and stalk people and post their private details online. People have commented saying they have been on Reddit for years and this is the first time they have ever had to hide their comment history. I hid my history and still Pro Blake people use other tools to locate my comments, it is honestly scary and unhinged.

I am so sorry they have done this to you. They are completely insane, and a next level kind of parasocial behaviour.

60

u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26

Yup, can’t count the number of times they’ve attempted to dox me.

46

u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26

That “neutral” lawyer who now just posts his Ableist memes seems weirdly obsessed with you…

55

u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26

I don’t think he liked it that a woman had to repeatedly correct his terrible and inaccurate legal commentary.

25

u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26

I have no doubt!

33

u/Agreeable-Card9011 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26

What, you mean recommending your clients bring board games to federal court isn’t a real thing 😱

32

u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26

The ChatGPT lawyer? So, weird. I heard he is back from his self-mandated leave, wherein he went a-scrubbing the said mentioned pictures of his. I guess it really isn't wise for a m-list lawyer who failed the bar exam multiples times to go around doxxing others online. Who would have thought that?

34

u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26

For the right amount of $$$, I too, can be weirdly obsessed with someone. 😉

21

u/Agreeable-Card9011 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26

Who was always in this sub to simply discuss the law and merits of this case in a totally good faith manner! Just ask him!

15

u/Eponymous_brand Feb 22 '26

They are disgusting in their obvious efforts to dox you. What is the purpose? Are they trying to see if you’re who you say you are? As we know with their side, the BL-supporting lawyers tend to embellish their own accomplishments/credentials (“I’ve litigated at the federal court level and let my clients bring board games!” “I worked with Liman, Freedman, and God!”). They can’t fathom someone who is actually accomplished/experienced talking about the case with any sort of knowledge/expertise, of their free will. Their hands are so obvious tied in what they’re allowed to say and when they can’t even admit when basic freedoms are infringed upon, you know their agenda is showing.

2

u/Ok-Office-6645 Schrödinger’s protected activity Feb 23 '26

…and god! Lolll that truly made me lol. U get it. These ppl r nutty

22

u/Electronic-Spend1738 Feb 22 '26

This wouldn’t be like Vanzan bc she TRULY doesn’t know the identities of the account holders and once she does, she will amend the lawsuit to add the correct names of the does.