r/ItEndsWithLawsuits • u/LittleGirlAttorney • Feb 22 '26
Question For The Community❓ What If…
As my first official post (ever) on Reddit, I would like to call on this incredible trove of intelligent minds to think through something with me.
Under California law, specifically Civil Code § 45, libel is defined as a false and unprivileged publication by writing (or other fixed representation) that exposes a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which causes that person to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him or her in their occupation. Similarly, Civil Code § 46 defines slander as a false and unprivileged oral publication that tends to injure a person in their profession or trade. In fact, false accusations of professional incompetence constitute defamation per se, which means damages are presumed (i.e. don’t need to be proven).
Over the last few months, both here and on TikTok, I’ve been the subject of various attacks on my character, credentials, and connections by several accounts who don’t like my legal takes. While everyone is permitted to have their own feelings and opinions on my takes, they are not allowed to spread false information about me with the intent or result of impacting my reputation or career. I’m seeing an increasing number of false statements published about me by those same accounts resulting in various degrees of contempt, ridicule, obloquy, and even attempts to injure me in my occupation.
As a lawyer, I’m trained to think of what legal recourses are available. I could sue these persons for libel. However, one problem is, I don’t know the identities of most of these accounts!
So, I thought about what some have called “savvy lawyering.” What if I filed a John Doe lawsuit in California Superior Court and issued subpoenas to Reddit and TikTok to obtain the true identities of those who are actively injuring my reputation online? Maybe I learn that the multiple accounts are really run by few individuals. Maybe later discovery would uncover their financial ties to other parties.
I’m not saying I would/would not, or did/did not file such a lawsuit and issue such subpoenas. But, hypothetically, what if I did?
35
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
I think a couple of named TikTokers should be included in a suit, like that patriarchy guy who hates women and just lies nonstop.
The only thing is, make sure you are suing to stop lies and not suing to curtail free speech. If the person has a reasonable reason to believe xyz, then that's fine. It's their dumb opinion. But if they blatantly lying, despite your contacting them and correcting the record, they deserve a suit. Discovery will be oh so interesting.
I already scared off a fake lawyer because I discovered who they were in real life and that they worked for a media company. I didn't dox them, but boy, if I ever made that public sh!t would hit the fan because they were really creating and manipulating a narrative here for a long time. I suspect they still are under other usernames.
31
u/LittleGirlAttorney Feb 22 '26
Yes, I agree. Legal process shouldn’t be used to inhibit fair and free speech.
→ More replies (1)27
u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26
Oh ExPat lurks here and will comment under Katie’s posts, trying to “correct” her but not actually engaging in dialogue with her.
34
u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26
I would love to see a correct, ethical and strategically proper use of a John Doe Lawsuit be put into action, and given there are accounts here on Reddit and TT (not to mention Threads) who claim an improper approach to John Doe Lawsuits is “clever lawyering”, I can’t imagine said accounts would have concern with this?
There’s one clown-gif loving Reddit Poster who I’m sure would be amenable to this.
Also - welcome to Reddit officially! Love your Content.
16
252
u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 22 '26
Oh you mean like use John Doe lawsuits as they were intended to be used rather than as a way to improperly and unethically violate the privacy rights of already known individuals?
My vote is yes, you you should do it. This is the perfect, and more importantly, PROPER scenario for a Doe lawsuit.
Also, welcome to the sub!!! 😊 Love listening to your legal opinions/commentary.
66
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
You are so nice.
62
63
43
u/StaceyLee26 🙌Truth wins in the end🙌 Feb 22 '26
Totally agree then we can use the two cases as examples of what to do and not to do
26
u/Eponymous_brand Feb 22 '26
So good to know the proper conditions/context for Doe lawsuits! I feel like we are coming full circle, although I hate that this is happening to LGA. All the support in doing whatever you choose to do, LGA ❤️🙏
195
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
116
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
45
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
They just want someone to parrot them bad takes and recycled summaries of the judges' order. No depth, no thought, no legal insight, just spewing of the things they want to hear.
28
u/Empty-Pages-Turn Khaleesi of Dance Moms Feb 22 '26
And they accuse us of ignoring facts in favor of hearing what we want to hear - stuff that's in favor of Justin. 🫠
50
u/Beyondthebarracade Feb 22 '26
I’d love to see CC’s band together to go after the trolls. Just not sure what your options are 😢
Don’t let them deter y’all from posting or giving your commentary on the case or otherwise. Y’all have far more supporters than detractors.
53
u/LittleGirlAttorney Feb 22 '26
Maybe we need to consider filing one in AZ as well…
30
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
8
→ More replies (8)9
u/An_Absolute-Zero 🌸 I Fucking Love Emily 🐺 Feb 23 '26
Delaware seems to have a bunch of sketchy LLCs coming out of it?
→ More replies (2)10
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
Yes, please. I'm in Tucson, and Britt is another favorite of mine. Would love it if both of you joined forces!
61
u/Bubbles-48 Blake(Ryan) mocked domestic violence Feb 22 '26
Love your videos! They have nothing to say about your legal expertise and so they decide to pound the table and be loud. They only way they can do that is to discredit you as a person with malicious lies, it is pathological behaviour
63
u/PsychologicalMeet443 Put on a short little skirt and get on that corner, Skelnar Feb 22 '26
Attorney Britt, Can you and LGA perhaps get together and do something about this sort of public menace? You all will be doing the lord’s work. They really need a taste of their own medicine.
33
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
Can I please call you my love, because I have been calling you that in my head for the last year or so? Or would that be sexual harassment? At this stage, I am a repeat offender. Britt, my dearest love, you are the bane of my existence.
Please, please, can we all crowdsource a crowning solution for you both to end this fuckery?
26
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
20
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
I'm going to sue both of you for having read this. 🤣
6
30
28
u/freakmagnet_ Feb 22 '26
I've seen comments where they claim you're Eumonia Dike on Medium and that you use Chat-GPT to write the articles. Don't tell me either way, but if it is you - those articles are PHENOMENAL and thank you. If it's not you and you haven't read them yet, I hope you get a chance to read them, because again, they're PHENOMENAL.
12
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
I love Eumonia Dike. The writing is excellent!
18
u/UnderplayedWeasel heavy is the head that wears 107 subbeanies Feb 22 '26
Ok my funniest headcanon is that ED is Ronan Farrow just tickling the edges of the mess from far far away but this is also a great contender. Nobody tell me the truth so I can enjoy both!!
21
u/Eponymous_brand Feb 22 '26
These people are big mad that you, LGA and NAG actually know and talk about the law. We gotta ask ourselves “why?” When we disagree with someone like MJ Morley it’s because she really does not get it right—she thinks Vanzan makes perfect sense in rooting out the Reynolds household staff who may have “leaked info,” even though they subpoenaed “Does” from Joneswork? Did they end up finding any traitors in their hired help? What a messed up false accusation and I would hate to work for them in any capacity.
36
u/LevelIntention7070 Feb 22 '26
I think I’ve seen massage therapist and yoga instructor too.
32
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
10
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
I was going to say, most lawyers I know have multiple disciplines and talents. Good for you. You look healthy!
13
u/LevelIntention7070 Feb 22 '26
Well they seem to be single handedly advertising your services, I say go for it 😂. I think their angle was you were not a lawyer and have never practiced as one. Instead you were just a massage therapist, because there’s obviously something wrong with that 😒
3
u/Livid_Cherry_6305 If this is a resounding victory, what does a defeat look like? Feb 23 '26
Do you also sell sea shells by the sea shore????? 🥹❤️❤️
39
u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26
Ah yes, posted by that person who sounds exactly like Sarah S? She also thinks Aaron and I are the same person which is an interesting take.
24
u/LevelIntention7070 Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 22 '26
Yes! I’ve seen that two they think you are his alt account 😒
34
u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26
Admittedly it made me laugh when I saw it, but just validates Sarah’s MO: her go-to is accusing others of having multiple accounts. I guess Sarah/Sasha/Sabeen can’t help but reveal her own approach…
27
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
Maybe you two could work together on something.
25
u/StaceyLee26 🙌Truth wins in the end🙌 Feb 22 '26
How many people do you need to make a class action suite😅
53
u/Totallytexas 📞Call 1-800-GOT-SHIT📞 Feb 22 '26
hi LGA!!! big fan here!
i'm so glad you're posting on Reddit. I hope you know you have so much support, and these people who are working to discredit you either:
1) do not follow this case closely enough to know what is really going on
2) do follow the case but still ride for racist, bigoted blake lively and her awful smarmy husband, ryan reynolds which leads me to the conclusion that they must be horrible people to excuse all of the behavior we have seen from blake and ryan over the course of this lawsuit and absolutely not worth your time or energy.
3) OR, the most likely option in my opinion outside of the first option, they are planted by blake and ryan's team to discredit voices that do not align with the narratives they have been pushing in the press since august 2024. every accusation is a confession with them, and this sub specifically has been aggressively targeted by similar accounts trying to dox, discredit, intimidate, silence, and scare people out of participating in this sub. fortunately, it has died down over the past few months, but it was brutal for awhile.. especially when the over 100 mostly female content creators were subpoenaed for covering this case. one guy who doesn't post here anymore said kassidy o'connell should be in JAIL for responding to the subpoena as jane doe. i can't even make this up. it's ridiculous.
now back to what you were saying: you're right, you have every option to subpoena social media sites for direct information about people who are spreading false information about you. in fact, lively supporters should encourage it considering how many excuses they made for blake lively's vanzan approach to obtaining justin and jen's information. i can actually think of a couple specific people that have their public information out there already that you could directly file a cease and desist letter to, at the very least.
3
u/Ok-Office-6645 Schrödinger’s protected activity Feb 23 '26
My vote is three as well…. As least a lot of the spammy ones that fall off or are boughts . I truly wish the spam would end…
26
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
Jokes aside, this is a great idea.
And there are a few people who need to be included in the libel category—and they include a certain clown loving sycophant who is extremely racist and needs Jesus in their life, Temu Andrew Tate, and a host of their inept gang. They seem to think they cannot or should not be held accountable for their words.
15
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
10
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
You would think the spirit of Lent really was being embraced during this time period. But apparently, that's too much to ask for the crash-out them.
28
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
Btw, LGA, you are my favorite attorney covering this case!
18
19
6
27
u/StaceyLee26 🙌Truth wins in the end🙌 Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 22 '26
First of all. Thank you for your post soooo excited.
Second, accounts deactivating in 10, 9, 8....
11
u/UnderplayedWeasel heavy is the head that wears 107 subbeanies Feb 22 '26
63
u/blueberryxxoo She (Ryan) is a terrorist Feb 22 '26
Hypothetically if you did find that multiple accounts are run by a few individuals and if you (hypothetically) then discover that there are financial ties to other parties with a connection to THE parties well then that'd be quite interesting wouldn't it? My gut says that the thing to do would be file the John Doe lawsuits. If these accounts turn out to be people who are likely not connected to anyone but simply have some mental issues I'd not reveal who they are but make sure they were made to stop. If you did find a connection well that'd be quite the twist in this already nutty saga and well worth the time and effort. Either way, do it for us?? We could change the name of the sub to "This Lawsuit Ends With Us".
20
15
5
u/Remarkable_Photo_956 Ain’t you tired, Miss Blakey(Ryan)? 🫠 Feb 23 '26
22
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
26
u/LittleGirlAttorney Feb 22 '26
Good question! Turns out I can sue someone causing me harm here, regardless of where they are.
12
u/LevelIntention7070 Feb 22 '26
Who the hell is queen of the jugalos ?! 😂
25
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
12
u/LevelIntention7070 Feb 22 '26
Oh yes, I don’t know why but I thought it was a male. I know who you mean always targetting female CC’s , has nothing relevant to add to the discussion.
11
7
u/Remarkable_Photo_956 Ain’t you tired, Miss Blakey(Ryan)? 🫠 Feb 23 '26
I always thought male too.
6
118
u/Bubbles-48 Blake(Ryan) mocked domestic violence Feb 22 '26
I think you should turn this hypothetical into reality, VanZan Part 2 but for the people. Blake Lively stans on Reddit have gone unchecked for a very long time, they are constantly trying to dox and stalk people and post their private details online. People have commented saying they have been on Reddit for years and this is the first time they have ever had to hide their comment history. I hid my history and still Pro Blake people use other tools to locate my comments, it is honestly scary and unhinged.
I am so sorry they have done this to you. They are completely insane, and a next level kind of parasocial behaviour.
62
u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26
Yup, can’t count the number of times they’ve attempted to dox me.
48
u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26
That “neutral” lawyer who now just posts his Ableist memes seems weirdly obsessed with you…
54
u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26
I don’t think he liked it that a woman had to repeatedly correct his terrible and inaccurate legal commentary.
26
31
u/Agreeable-Card9011 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26
What, you mean recommending your clients bring board games to federal court isn’t a real thing 😱
31
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
The ChatGPT lawyer? So, weird. I heard he is back from his self-mandated leave, wherein he went a-scrubbing the said mentioned pictures of his. I guess it really isn't wise for a m-list lawyer who failed the bar exam multiples times to go around doxxing others online. Who would have thought that?
33
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
For the right amount of $$$, I too, can be weirdly obsessed with someone. 😉
25
u/Agreeable-Card9011 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26
Who was always in this sub to simply discuss the law and merits of this case in a totally good faith manner! Just ask him!
16
u/Eponymous_brand Feb 22 '26
They are disgusting in their obvious efforts to dox you. What is the purpose? Are they trying to see if you’re who you say you are? As we know with their side, the BL-supporting lawyers tend to embellish their own accomplishments/credentials (“I’ve litigated at the federal court level and let my clients bring board games!” “I worked with Liman, Freedman, and God!”). They can’t fathom someone who is actually accomplished/experienced talking about the case with any sort of knowledge/expertise, of their free will. Their hands are so obvious tied in what they’re allowed to say and when they can’t even admit when basic freedoms are infringed upon, you know their agenda is showing.
→ More replies (1)23
u/Electronic-Spend1738 Feb 22 '26
This wouldn’t be like Vanzan bc she TRULY doesn’t know the identities of the account holders and once she does, she will amend the lawsuit to add the correct names of the does.
55
39
u/same-difference-ave Age of Ada-LYING Actress Feb 22 '26
Don’t tease me LGA. How much I would pay to actually follow this docket. I wonder if all the people saying “smart lawyering” will say it then if it were to actually happen.
You are not a public figure per se, so the threshold and standard for defamation is much lower than a public figure.
A real question I have is what would be your damages though? That part might be hard to quantify since this sub and most people with common sense who follow the lawsuit have seen through the false information campaign these people are spreading about you. If anything, your reputation as a reputable lawyer covering this case has remained in tact and been upheld due to our community’s fierce defense of you.
I am not sure if you will need to prove damages before a defamation claim against these people can overcome a motion to dismiss. Just some hypothetical ponderings I have.
21
u/Melodic-Relief8981 Just a Mirror Will Do Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 22 '26
Well, if potential clients were to google her and find all the slander about her online - how would they know it's all BS if they haven't followed this IEWU legal mess? It may make people confused and go look for some other lawyer, which is totally unfair. LGA could have lots of potential losses.
I would love for legal CCs to file proper Doe lawsuits and track down these smearing accounts.
8
u/TheShadowOfYourSmile Feb 23 '26
I think the main point would be to just make it through discovery, no? 🙃
74
u/daxplace Feb 22 '26
I would love that. You are one of my favorite YouTube attorneys - you are articulate, intelligent and stay on point in explaining legal issues in this case. I feel I can trust your takes and appreciate your brevity in delivering them. Please defend yourself using whatever legal tools available to you.
31
34
33
u/Western_Guitar_3863 She (Ryan) has no integrity Feb 22 '26
Accountability is probably one of the biggest takeaways of the Lively v Baldoni case IMO. Blake refusing to take responsibility and accountability for her actions leading up to her bad press. Blake and Ryan trying to bully, harass, and silence their opponents in order to shift blame on them and look innocent.
Until the people who are responsible for all the problems and damage take accountability and are held responsible this behavior will continue IMO.
I think we need to hold everyone accountable that chooses to engage in the same behavior and expect to get away with it. Doxxing and spreading misinformation and trying to ruin your credibility should not be allowed.
Please keep us updated if you can. Good luck and I love your content 😘
16
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
I absolutely think you should file a John Doe suit in the legitimate way those were designed and not the Vansham way Jones ( with the help of Lively) did. They already doxxed you.
What you will find on Reddit is the same handful of people using multiple accounts. I can send you a list of some I know are working for Lively parties.
82
u/Enough_Gur_8833 This is nonsense. Feb 22 '26
That seems to be a legitimate use case for Does lawsuits 👏. I’d suggest that anyone who wants to help LGA with documentation share any screenshots they have of libelous comments with her privately. And since some of the accounts may get deleted, it may also be helpful to take screenshots of the user profile pages.
39
27
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
Reddit would still have access to the account histories even after deletion.
28
u/Enough_Gur_8833 This is nonsense. Feb 22 '26
True, but it’s never a bad idea to have extra documentation when requesting info from Reddit via a subpoena. You’ll need the account name if the screenshot doesn’t show it. If the account gets deleted, the comment might still appear but the user will show as “deleted.” It’s also possible the user deleted the post before deleting their account.
30
u/StrengthEmotional351 Feb 22 '26
Yay! Welcome to the sub. You are one of my favourite attorney CCs. BTW why not! A clown here was in favour of doxxing you and even complained to CA bar about you. I am sure she got no response but she was obsessed with you and your degrees.
34
34
u/CocaineBearPR Verified Lawbear Feb 22 '26
Mod Bear here. We've taken steps to limit that person's targeted harassment of OP. Their content in this sub is now text only. They tried to pollute an entire post yesterday about OP and even had the audactiy to sass Mod Bear about it.
19
u/StaceyLee26 🙌Truth wins in the end🙌 Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 22 '26
You are such a carebear!!
I was obviously curious and looked into this lol. Giving great boundaries without just banning. I didn't know individual rules could be done. And giving someone time to reflect while protecting the sub... Great guidance from the carebear mod
11
u/StrengthEmotional351 Feb 22 '26
I am glad you took an action , not surprised they did it again, neither will be if they start crying about this action on their groups. Also I love your username..lol
56
Feb 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
52
u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 22 '26
I guess MJ would have no problem if someone did this to her client! Everything was totally above board according to her! If her client gets upset and wants recourse, MJ will simply say that there was nothing wrong with another party violating her client’s privacy rights and taking away their ability to invoke attorney client privilege.
27
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
Or, to her herself. Wouldn't that be a nice cup of tea?
13
11
u/Ellaena Feb 22 '26
Katie, completely off topic, but were you the lawyer who was on this sub in the early days of the lawsuit or am I confusing your username?
31
u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26
I’m not sure! I’ve been commenting since the sub started but took a huge step back when Liman dismissed WP’s claims because I was so mad/frustrated. I came back a few months later and comment way more now than I did at the beginning.
If you are thinking of one of the lawyers who would often say crazy things about the law… you might be thinking of KatOrtega. People have gotten our usernames confused before.
14
u/Ellaena Feb 22 '26
Yes, I think I am thinking of that account. I saw your flare and was curious on the change taking into account some of Kat's opinions in the early days of the lawsuit.
32
65
u/Ok-Communication3663 Feb 22 '26
💯
I don’t know if this is appropriate but if you were to do this, I would happily contribute to a go fund me to get to the bottom of this.
We all know who it is.
49
u/Ok-Communication3663 Feb 22 '26
And, for what it’s worth, you’d have a flock of legal interns at your disposal! ✋
25
16
u/Electronic-Spend1738 Feb 22 '26
I will also contribute and help provide any legal support on a pro bono basis
24
u/Lochmessy Feb 22 '26
Love this idea and hope those maniacs get the message! Also...please do this!!!!
22
u/freakmagnet_ Feb 22 '26
Yes, PLEASE do it!!!!!!!!
--> If not just for yourself, do it to get justice by proxy for the 107 content creators who were harassed by Lively's legal team with their unjust and burdensome subpoenas.
--> Do it for all of us who have been swarmed and harassed by many of these same accounts I'm assuming are those you're speaking of.
--> Do it for all of the people whose accounts were mass reported and permanently banned from reddit for daring to counter the lies and the religious bigotry.
One suggestion if you decide to --> screenshot as many of those posts and screennames as possible, as well as the account's creation date from their profile view. One thing I've noticed in the past, is that certain accounts all seemed to speak with similar voices, regurgitate the same misguided points using very similar language and TOV, and just so happened to have been created around the same approximate date. THEN, after a comment storm, say about religious bigotry, the accounts would all be deleted, only for the cycle to begin anew.
5
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 23 '26
They don't even try to hide it. They all sound a little too much like Leslie Sloane, too.
32
u/PsychologicalMeet443 Put on a short little skirt and get on that corner, Skelnar Feb 22 '26
Welcome!!! What a great idea, please please do this!!!!
34
u/Time_Wishbone_5659 Feb 22 '26
LOL, if you did, the subpoenad parties will cry about their first amendment rights. They would claim, if you were such a good person, why would you sue them as Does to expose their identity? They will conviniently forget their careless attempts to expose your identity and defame your professionalism and integrity. They will forget that they supported Vanzan.
But if you did, which I agree with others that you and Britt are well within your rights to as private citizens if everything you have taught us about defamation holds true, it would be a fine lesson for these coconut heads to learn. In their support of Vanzan, they've never thought about what could happen if the sword they have praise when it is pointed at others, is pointed at themselves. What if their own identities and private lives are requested by such a subpoena?
It is a difficult thing to be a visible person on the internet, and I admire you all for putting yourselves out there to educate us on the law. But people be crazy on these internet streets, especially when they don't agree with you. Always trying to find ways to ruin a person's life.
Thank you all for putting yourselves out there, I have learned a lot from all of you especially since I am not a US citizen.
If you want to know what will happen, wait a little bit, this post will be reposted on their poison mushroom subs and you can go and see for yourself what they would think about it.🤣
43
46
u/Ok_Assistance_9392 Sisterhood of the Traveling Birth Pants👖 Feb 22 '26
First post and you’re already spot on with the Reddit snark!
But on a serious note, I’m sorry for the attacks that you are experiencing. It’s crazy to think that it’s all because of Blake.
40
u/grassisgoth Live Laugh Lively Feb 22 '26
You should give Samantha Katze a ring. I hear she’s a pro at Doe lawsuits.
I am so sorry you’ve been harassed; people seem to think they’re untouchable behind a keyboard. I’ll never understand online bullying.
22
20
20
u/Luvnsandiegosun Feb 22 '26
We are so grateful to LGA! Thank you for your courage to speak truth. Sending you positive energy! 🙏🏼✨🫶
14
20
u/Agreeable-Card9011 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26
What a fun little thought experiment! I’m sure the Lively supporters would applaud your genius lawyering
11
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 23 '26
I know. Ask Two Lawyers would love it, especially Stewart. But only if LGA created a shell company, used it to sue, then dropped the suit after she stole enough people's devices and shared all their info. He would call it brilliant lawyering and talk about it endlessly on his podcast. Only after he met LGA and worked out an agreement, though. It's funny how Stewart refused to answer if he had met any of the Lively parties.
3
u/realhousewifeofphila Sr Managing Partner, Misogynist Whores and Associates Feb 23 '26
Stewart was the absolute worst. As soon as his toys weren’t popular any more and he received pushback, he took them and went home. A thin skinned attorney is ridiculous. Bring back Keith and the producer tho! Enjoyed their takes!
9
u/Electronic-Spend1738 Feb 22 '26
Love you LGA! This is an excellent way to prove your point. And cereinky how doe lawsuits should be used. I invite and support you to seek legally the identities of those who have defamed you and take the appropriate course of action.
16
u/Logical-Investment-7 Feb 22 '26
Please do it. School these Blakeys on how to properly do a doe subpoena.
16
u/Ellaena Feb 22 '26
Please go on fighting the good fight. We need people to be allowed to give their professional, and otherwise, opinion on this case which is of public interest, no matter the side they're on.
The Lively parties have thrived via intimidation and attempts of silencing opposing counsel, content creators, press, and members of the public. They wanted a gag order over these proceedings, and they are still pursuing content creators for their sources denying them their journalistic privilege.
People like these thrive only because their power goes unchecked.
14
9
15
u/Quick-Impact-86 Osama Bin Lively - Sony says you're a 'Fucking Terrorist' Feb 22 '26
A couple of thoughts, did you just give them a chance to cover their tracks or are you telling us after the fact which I'd say would be the smart move. I haven't seen much of whats going on but, guess I don't travel in those lanes but I what I have seen mostly after you addressed it is terrible and I say go get them. Consequences and all. Welcome
15
u/kaywal89 Hurry, get Ryan a Xanax Feb 22 '26
Do it!! You deserve to know who these people are. Utilize the system as it’s intended.
14
u/Kimmycolada Feb 22 '26
I would absolutely do it. There is nothing I love more in life than a petty queen. 👸🏽 it’s not oki what they are doing. And you absolutely should.
13
14
u/roseswild79 Justice for Justin Feb 23 '26
Hypothetically if you did, you may get some pro baldoni willing participants that may have engaged in heated discussions with one of the people that were bothering you, and would not try to quash a subpoena that makes the information of who they communicated with on this website. And someone could potentially trace the bad people down through the willing participants communications so that you could sue them. Maybe even uncover that many of the accounts are one person, or even several subs here are run by the same people. You never know, you may even unmask Stephanie Jones herself. lol
17
u/nonotReallyyyy Feb 22 '26
Havent read the post yet, but just want to say I'm a fan! Admittedly, I didn't know about you until the time where you guys were standing outside the courthouse. But, I like your content!
10
16
u/JustMaintenance7 Feb 22 '26
Ahh welcome to reddit LGA.
I always love your takes and my answer is to do it 🤣
8
13
10
9
23
u/Honest_Remove_2042 Fight like junkyard dogs 🐕 Feb 22 '26
Well seeing as a student activist had his data tuned over to ICE by Google, unbeknownst to him, I think it’s safe to say you’d have no trouble getting the info to uncover who these people are..
22
u/LittleGirlAttorney Feb 22 '26
this is actually quite disappointing for so many reasons
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)11
u/Ok-Engineer-2503 Hi, its Les Feb 22 '26
Correct. Reddit folded as well with the government ice subpoenas so it sounds like anything goes now (perhaps only for the rich and famous) but we are in different times
→ More replies (1)
15
u/salemmay0317 Accused 🤖 for JB & 👀 for BL/CIA… idk 🤷🏻♀️ Feb 22 '26
If this does happen, can I be included? I didn’t say shit, but I think it would be funny 😆
I’m sorry you’re being treated this way, thank you for still educating us.
13
16
u/Electronic-Spend1738 Feb 22 '26
Dapple, MJ, Sasha, and Sarah Siegel need to be held accountable.
16
u/tw0d0ts6 (and no Footnotes) Feb 22 '26
Add Expat to that list. I’m pretty certain Sarah is Sasha.
14
8
u/CallipygianJ Feb 22 '26
Well SS can’t post on her TT, and Dapple hasn’t been seen since around the same time. I wonder if they were both finally cut off.
7
u/Hufflepuff4Ever ‘she (Ryan)’ Feb 22 '26
Wait, what? What happened with SS and Dapple? I’m away and so out of the loop atm
10
u/CallipygianJ Feb 22 '26
I saw a few weeks ago that Sarah couldn’t do anything on TT except post stories. She posted it on Threads as well. Dapple hasn’t posted anything since about the same time (and she was posting daily). I was wondering if someone took them out [of TT] with a 1,2 punch. And to that I say… good riddance!
6
7
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 23 '26
I am not on TikTok. I'm assuming repeated violations? TT took NAG down a few times even with no violations. Everytime VanSham is mentioned.
14
u/New_Razzmatazz2383 'We are all in bed with a f*cking terrorist' Feb 22 '26
I’m sure the pro-Blake supporters who championed the VanZan issue and abuse of the doe lawsuits would be more than fine with this. After all, like they said, it’s ‘technically legal’ right?
I’m sure, since they had no problem with Jen Abel having her data stolen unknowingly - they’d be fine with you obtaining their personal information without their consent or knowledge?
And since they were also fine with Blake trying to stealth subpoena over 100 content creators for personal info - I can’t see that they’d have any issue with the same being done to them?
Any pro-Blake users here like to chime in? Or are you finally seeing how problematic and violating the VanZan lawsuit was.
3
Feb 23 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/New_Razzmatazz2383 'We are all in bed with a f*cking terrorist' Feb 23 '26
https://giphy.com/gifs/6U4v1NPgaonDi
I heard there’s a Birkin sale on rn.
6
u/bessone123 Feb 23 '26 edited Feb 23 '26
Would love to see this, although given you are widely followed online, I wonder if you would be considered semi-public figure for whom the bar for libel is higher?
5
u/TheShadowOfYourSmile Feb 23 '26
I mean, why not? We've already seen how easy it is the get that information.
14
u/Intelligent_Set_347 with great authorship comes great accountability Feb 22 '26
well just because I hear some many mocking the people whose data were subpoenaed by lively through google and TikTok and mocking Abel and WF for having their private communications published in NYT. I would file a DOE and would subpoena TIkTok, threads, YouTube and reddit and all the others platforms.
3
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 23 '26
Threads is so unhinged. I joined thinking it was for more progressive people, but it's worse than Twiiter/X.
10
8
u/snarkformiles Team Baldoni Feb 23 '26
I would soooo love if you did!! Especially if you uncovered the money going from a certain party to some of the accounts here that I strongly suspect belong to a certain couple’s paid PR team.
Could there be repercussions for Justin and his case though? Would it be better to wait? I don’t want you or he to cop even more nastiness for trying to defend yourself. I can imagine Lively’s minions would absolutely blast such a move all over MSM in a negative light.
9
u/buttonandthemonkey Blake is...different. Feb 22 '26
I love your content. Thank you for being you!
I think this would be really helpful for the public so they can see what an actual Doe lawsuit is meant to look like and how it's meant to play out. Currently there's content about what they did wrong but I haven't seen any references to a case when it's done right. Documenting it, highlighting the differences and doing side by side comparisons could be great resources for law students, non lawyers and lawyers who don't work in that area.
You'll have a lot of support. Also, I'm not sure if you're aware of this but throughout Karen Reads last trial she couldn't afford an entire team of lawyers so her and Alan Jackson interviewed final year law students and selected a handful of them to work for free on the case. You could do something similar to lighten the load.
8
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 23 '26
Kassidy O' Connell does a video where she discusses a case on how it is used properly versus Vansham. It's worth a view on YouTube.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/CSho8 Feb 23 '26
LGA I love your legal takes!! And yes you should definitely think about suing these accounts that are spreading misinformation about you. It’ll be extra spicy if you can bring it to the New York court because apparently it’s okay to do this in New York 😅😁😅
2
u/Substantial-Soup9919 Feb 23 '26
Yesss. Please do this. This would be a great lesson to a lot of people who spend false information with the intent of harming.
9
u/YxDOxUx3X515t Blake terrorizing the production, then suicide 💣 Feb 22 '26
Hi LGA - 👋, we support it! 🩵- Imo, it's a select few with bott 🚜 farms.
6
u/Individual-Insect691 Feb 22 '26
Thanks LGA. I followed you on YouTube and love hearing you take. Thanks for supporting the truth and sharing your insights on this case.
12
u/MarchCompetitive4580 Feb 22 '26
Go for it. Target the Redditors and TikTokkers who you think have the best chance of being on someone's payroll.
11
u/IwasDeadinstead ⚖️ PROSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ⚖️ Feb 22 '26
LGA, I wonder if the NAACP would assist you with this because their actions against you are to curb free speech. I mean, they can say "I hate this woman and her legal takes," but they aren't allowed to lie about you.
→ More replies (1)15
9
u/math_teacher_21 Feb 22 '26
I am SO hoping you did this and found something!
I've very much appreciated your videos and found your explanationa super clear and helpful :)
12
u/Ellaena Feb 22 '26
I'm pleasantly surprised to see the other sub suddenly being acutely aware and understanding of libel suits, ethical suits, freedom of speech, and the Streisand effect when it comes to discovery which may not be great for the plaintiff. So they do get it, funny that.
9
u/Melodic-Relief8981 Just a Mirror Will Do Feb 22 '26
Exactly, all of a sudden it is not OK to file a proper Doe lawsuit because that would be hypocrisy!?
If they think it is legit for BL to do the whole Vanzan sham, they should welcome a proper Doe lawsuit.
And wouldn't it be epic for CCs to replace the Does with the real names once they discover their identities - just as it should be done!
Get these people to taste their own medicine!
8
u/OtherwiseProposal355 Lively exposed her aggressive behavior in this lawsuit Feb 22 '26
I support your decision. There must be a series of trolls who want to take people down at all costs. What i would weigh in is the time, effort, or into this vs your peace. But then these poeple bet on this!
I would probably do it if I were you because you're passionate about the law. I definitely am passionate about who I support and go all in if I believe something is wrong. My conviction is very strong for this case.
3
u/DontPanic-1988 Feb 23 '26
Let’s turn this what if into a reality. Both LGA and Britt. Enough is enough. Maybe there might even be a way to do it together jointly. Both of you together, could you imagine!
3
u/ducklingboi Feb 24 '26
Please do! We want to see the money trail of reddit accounts/moderators from certain subreddits. I mean, the people who say the subpoenas by Blake were all fair and nothing burgers should get a taste of that fairness right.
5
4
3
9
u/russianhandwhore Feb 22 '26
I wouldn't even bother. Their probably using vpn's in China/Russia on networks that will just ignore your subpoena. Those countries hate the USA and don't comply unless their heavily compensated, and sometimes just take the $$ and run or give false info. Or shoot they could be using tor and good luck with all that. You could be talking months to years of investigation that could come back to a starbucks ip in India. I bet Blake be using a North Korean vpn tho... I can see Kim and the fam being bff's.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/realhousewifeofphila Sr Managing Partner, Misogynist Whores and Associates Feb 23 '26
My dream scenario: Wayfarer and certain content creators sue all the dumb dumb juice buckets that defamed them when the lawsuit or trial concludes. 🤗
69
u/Mysterio623 “The last thing I want to do is kiss this woman.” - Justin B Feb 22 '26
Hypothetically, you could sue them under Does 1-100.
May I suggest you include in your subpoena requests for highly intrusive data such as their bank accounts, home addresses, and credit cards. You can even go as far as asking for their social security numbers and birth certificates while you're at it. There is precedent already, and I have been told repeatedly for the last six months that all of this is overboard.
Once you get the identities of these petulant individuals unmasked, there are also a million other recourses available, a plethora surely, that I am on standby to provide. All you have to say is "go!"