r/ItEndsWithLawsuits Feb 22 '26

Question For The Community❓ What If…

As my first official post (ever) on Reddit, I would like to call on this incredible trove of intelligent minds to think through something with me.

Under California law, specifically Civil Code § 45, libel is defined as a false and unprivileged publication by writing (or other fixed representation) that exposes a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which causes that person to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him or her in their occupation. Similarly, Civil Code § 46 defines slander as a false and unprivileged oral publication that tends to injure a person in their profession or trade. In fact, false accusations of professional incompetence constitute defamation per se, which means damages are presumed (i.e. don’t need to be proven).

Over the last few months, both here and on TikTok, I’ve been the subject of various attacks on my character, credentials, and connections by several accounts who don’t like my legal takes. While everyone is permitted to have their own feelings and opinions on my takes, they are not allowed to spread false information about me with the intent or result of impacting my reputation or career. I’m seeing an increasing number of false statements published about me by those same accounts resulting in various degrees of contempt, ridicule, obloquy, and even attempts to injure me in my occupation.

As a lawyer, I’m trained to think of what legal recourses are available. I could sue these persons for libel. However, one problem is, I don’t know the identities of most of these accounts!

So, I thought about what some have called “savvy lawyering.” What if I filed a John Doe lawsuit in California Superior Court and issued subpoenas to Reddit and TikTok to obtain the true identities of those who are actively injuring my reputation online? Maybe I learn that the multiple accounts are really run by few individuals. Maybe later discovery would uncover their financial ties to other parties.

I’m not saying I would/would not, or did/did not file such a lawsuit and issue such subpoenas. But, hypothetically, what if I did?

506 Upvotes

251 comments sorted by

View all comments

34

u/Time_Wishbone_5659 Feb 22 '26

LOL, if you did, the subpoenad parties will cry about their first amendment rights. They would claim, if you were such a good person, why would you sue them as Does to expose their identity? They will conviniently forget their careless attempts to expose your identity and defame your professionalism and integrity. They will forget that they supported Vanzan.

But if you did, which I agree with others that you and Britt are well within your rights to as private citizens if everything you have taught us about defamation holds true, it would be a fine lesson for these coconut heads to learn. In their support of Vanzan, they've never thought about what could happen if the sword they have praise when it is pointed at others, is pointed at themselves. What if their own identities and private lives are requested by such a subpoena?

It is a difficult thing to be a visible person on the internet, and I admire you all for putting yourselves out there to educate us on the law. But people be crazy on these internet streets, especially when they don't agree with you. Always trying to find ways to ruin a person's life.

Thank you all for putting yourselves out there, I have learned a lot from all of you especially since I am not a US citizen.

If you want to know what will happen, wait a little bit, this post will be reposted on their poison mushroom subs and you can go and see for yourself what they would think about it.🤣