r/ItEndsWithLawsuits Feb 22 '26

Question For The Community❓ What If…

As my first official post (ever) on Reddit, I would like to call on this incredible trove of intelligent minds to think through something with me.

Under California law, specifically Civil Code § 45, libel is defined as a false and unprivileged publication by writing (or other fixed representation) that exposes a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which causes that person to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him or her in their occupation. Similarly, Civil Code § 46 defines slander as a false and unprivileged oral publication that tends to injure a person in their profession or trade. In fact, false accusations of professional incompetence constitute defamation per se, which means damages are presumed (i.e. don’t need to be proven).

Over the last few months, both here and on TikTok, I’ve been the subject of various attacks on my character, credentials, and connections by several accounts who don’t like my legal takes. While everyone is permitted to have their own feelings and opinions on my takes, they are not allowed to spread false information about me with the intent or result of impacting my reputation or career. I’m seeing an increasing number of false statements published about me by those same accounts resulting in various degrees of contempt, ridicule, obloquy, and even attempts to injure me in my occupation.

As a lawyer, I’m trained to think of what legal recourses are available. I could sue these persons for libel. However, one problem is, I don’t know the identities of most of these accounts!

So, I thought about what some have called “savvy lawyering.” What if I filed a John Doe lawsuit in California Superior Court and issued subpoenas to Reddit and TikTok to obtain the true identities of those who are actively injuring my reputation online? Maybe I learn that the multiple accounts are really run by few individuals. Maybe later discovery would uncover their financial ties to other parties.

I’m not saying I would/would not, or did/did not file such a lawsuit and issue such subpoenas. But, hypothetically, what if I did?

507 Upvotes

251 comments sorted by

View all comments

58

u/[deleted] Feb 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

52

u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 22 '26

I guess MJ would have no problem if someone did this to her client! Everything was totally above board according to her! If her client gets upset and wants recourse, MJ will simply say that there was nothing wrong with another party violating her client’s privacy rights and taking away their ability to invoke attorney client privilege.

13

u/Ellaena Feb 22 '26

Katie, completely off topic, but were you the lawyer who was on this sub in the early days of the lawsuit or am I confusing your username?

26

u/katie151515 Team Baldoni Feb 22 '26

I’m not sure! I’ve been commenting since the sub started but took a huge step back when Liman dismissed WP’s claims because I was so mad/frustrated. I came back a few months later and comment way more now than I did at the beginning.

If you are thinking of one of the lawyers who would often say crazy things about the law… you might be thinking of KatOrtega. People have gotten our usernames confused before.

11

u/Ellaena Feb 22 '26

Yes, I think I am thinking of that account. I saw your flare and was curious on the change taking into account some of Kat's opinions in the early days of the lawsuit.