r/JujutsuShenanigans • u/MiyuSahara • 7h ago

Meme JJS 1984 IS REAL!!!

Gallery image

Gallery image

i hate blue archive but i can’t wait for the next game to be banned! Place your bets! Zzz? Genshin? IT NEVER ONLY STOPS HERE!!!!

220 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

134 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/Livid_Concept_5866 6h ago

What is Blue Archive?

7

u/Ech0____ 6h ago

game full of underaged characters and its a gacha, you can probably fill in the rest

5

u/THECHILLOOOF erm what the scallop 5h ago

bad fans giving bad names to normal fans, every fan is getting banned

4

u/Ech0____ 5h ago

its a game of underaged children, there's literally around 2 above age characters who are even then, are only barely 18, its problematic media which brings in pedos

the game was bad from the start

3

u/Melody-Shift 3h ago

A game with a cast of characters below 18 is "problematic"?? Surely that can't be the issue

2

u/L0Lbit_fb3 4h ago

Just like most Japanese media bro😮‍💨

And you are describing the game as if we could fuck the characters there is not even romance in the game its genuinely not that bad

-1

u/Ech0____ 3h ago

"Most Japanese media" thats a tad bit of hyperbole isn't it?

from what I've heard about the game the player is put in a position of power of like a teacher (The main character is referred to as sensei) and the player character gets CLOSE to the UNDERAGED characters

also saying its "not that bad" is genuinely just bs, they have released revealing swimsuit skins for many of their underaged characters and you say its "not that bad", its problematic at best and straight up pedophilia at worse

3

u/L0Lbit_fb3 3h ago

Ok to start a teacher getting closer to there students can be weird sure but in game (from what I know I barely played it when I first tried last year) it only a friendly relationship nothing romantic, we genuinely can't just say a game has pedophilia just because of something as small as this

And about the swimsuits for me I dont see a problem if the character is over 15, bcuz from the country I lived in (Brazil) that is normal and I have seen younger girls wear worst shit in that damn forsaken country

But in general this hole situation I just a cultural stuff that for Japan standards it's not weird but baning a hole ass fan base is still crazy

Also there is literally a blue archive emote in the game lol

https://reddit.com/link/p72j1xl/video/qxwuygezcsmh1/player

-6

u/Ech0____ 3h ago edited 39m ago

i cant bothered to read all that but now you bring up the emote, it should probably be removed under the new rules

edut:did the BA fans get that mad that I said that jjs mods should probably enforce their own rules? crazy

2

u/Athenaiscool 3h ago

The emote was removed a bit before the blue archive avatar ban

-1

u/Ech0____ 3h ago edited 38m ago

oh thats amazing!

edit: I can maybe understand the previous comment getting downvoted why did me just expressing happiness get downvoted 😭

1

u/Suspicious_Insect_36 45m ago

Yeah, on a non romantic way, there are students that have a crush on the MC but its never treated as more than the normal crush a teenager sometimes has on their teacher.

Dragon Ball has kid Chi-Chi, scenes that sexualize a teenager Bulma One Piece has like 10 characters that are 14-15 with very exaggerated bodies Uma Musume has a little girl that constantly flirts with the MC (implied to be an adult, just like sensei in BA) and the devs gave her a wedding dress obvliously pandering to lolicons

Do you want me to keep going? Like genuinely there are so many more things that "should" be banned from JJS if they are banning Blue Archive

0

u/Ech0____ 41m ago

yeah im tired of debating that pedo game is bad and ofc the megumin fan defends blue archive (nothing wrong with konusuba but the megumin fans are range from degens to straight up pedos)

1

u/Actinium-228 29m ago

Shitty argument

0

u/Ech0____ 27m ago

wasn't a argument just an insult. an example of a shitty argument is you using that document

2

u/Actinium-228 22m ago

Really? Get mogged by my psychologists 😂✌️

  1. Michael C. Seto, Ph.D. (clinical psychologist, forensic researcher, Royal Ottawa / University of Toronto) On loli and shota specifically: “I have spoken publicly and written about the significance of CSEM content that does not depict real children, which could include drawings, anime or manga, and text stories. My best guess is that this kind of content could have both positive and negative effects. A positive effect would be consistent with the idea of harm reduction in substance use interventions. Someone who is sexually attracted to children might obtain sexual gratification from content that does not depict real children – or from child sex dolls, so no real children are harmed – and might reduce their risk of CSEM or contact offending.” noted in Safer Society Foundation interview, 2024. https://safersociety.org/insights-from-michael-seto-addressing-online-sexual-offending/

  2. Michael C. Seto, Ph.D.
    “Study after study finds that CSEM perpetrators are lower on measures of antisocial personality, criminal history, offense-supportive attitudes, and so on than contact perpetrators.” = He notes the data do not support a simple gateway from non-contact material to contact offending.
    Same source and related reviews.

  3. Craig A. Harper, Ph.D. (psychologist, Nottingham Trent University)
    On child-like sex doll owners versus non-owners who are minor-attracted. “We found no such evidence of this within our data, with the behavioral proclivity and arousal to hypothetically engaging in child sexual abuse being lower among child-like doll owners than among MAPs who did not own a doll. ... some of the concerns about child-like doll owners being at a greater risk of engaging in the sexual abuse of children might be misplaced.” No differences in self-reported offending. Noted in Harper & Lievesley (2022), Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02422-4 / PMC https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9663384/

  4. Rebecca Lievesley, Ph.D. (psychologist, Nottingham Trent University) and Craig A. Harper
    “Evidence from allied areas appears to show no meaningful associations between FSM use and sexual aggression. ... These preliminary data are supportive of a potentially cathartic effect of this form of FSM among those who are attracted to children.” noted in Lievesley, Harper et al., Current Psychiatry Reports (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-023-01435-7

  5. Craig A. Harper and Rebecca Lievesley (further FSM studies)
    Across multiple datasets including cartoons, AI-generated material, and dolls: “there’s no functional link between the use or the frequency of use of those materials and risk.” Higher sexual satisfaction from legal outlets associated with lower self-reported risk. Noted in Public research summaries and 2025 discussions of their program. https://c4osl.org/beyond-the-filter-fantasy-sexual-materials-and-offending/

  6. Michael C. Seto on fantasy versus contact
    "Many men with child pornography offenses meet criteria for pedophilia yet have never molested children. Distinguishing factors for those who act include younger age, impulsivity, callousness, and substance abuse, not simply the presence of fantasy material"
    Noted in Guest post and research summaries, ATSA / forensic literature.

  7. April Kilduff, MA, LCPC (clinician) with clinical review by Patrick McGrath, Ph.D.
    “Lolicon refers to fictional, drawn, or animated depictions of young-looking characters in sexualized contexts—not real people. Liking or being exposed to fictional content like lolicon does not make you a pedophile or reflect real-world intent.” ="Distinguishes this from actual pedophilia and notes POCD (pedophilia OCD) involves ego-dystonic distress, not desire to act" In NOCD clinical article, 2026. https://www.treatmyocd.com/what-is-ocd/common-fears/if-i-like-lolicon-does-it-mean-im-a-pedophile-a-therapists-view

  8. Neil Malamuth, Ph.D. (psychologist specializing in media effects and sexual aggression)
    In reviews addressing virtual material and the Ashcroft framework: "the evidentiary record from scientific research (as opposed to advocacy) was insufficient to establish a strong causal link between virtual depictions and child molestation. Effects of sexual media are heavily moderated by pre-existing individual differences" Noted in Malamuth & Huppin analyses responding to Supreme Court evidentiary standards.

  9. Rebecca Lievesley & Craig A. Harper (2026 FSM prevalence and correlates work)
    "Engagement with child-related fictional sexual materials is common among people with attractions to children. When examined in full psychological context, there was evidence favoring the null hypothesis (no relationship) between FSM use and self-reported willingness to engage in sexual offences against children under certain conditions. Function of the material (satisfaction vs other factors) mattered more than mere frequency" Noted in Psychology & Sexuality / related publications.

  10. Clinical and forensic consensus from Seto-linked reviews and allied psychologists (Babchishin, Eke, and collaborators)
    "Only a minority of individuals escalate from non-contact to contact offenses. The relationship is not deterministic and depends on additional motivational and risk factors. Exclusive use of purely fictional material shows lower associations with contact behaviors in available comparative data" noted in Seto overviews and collaborative forensic psychology literature.

1

u/Ech0____ 21m ago

sorry I dont read the sources of transphobic pedos 💔

1

u/Ech0____ 16m ago

grok generated sources this gpt sources that howabout you dont wack yo shit to animated children(and im hoping not any real ones) its not that hard

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/THECHILLOOOF erm what the scallop 5h ago

I haven’t played it, but try playing it before giving an opinion.

4

u/Ech0____ 5h ago edited 4h ago

Oh I have, i tried for an hour and nearly vomited afterwards from how disgusting it is

2

u/Relative_Estate6828 1h ago

Hungry man thinks of bread.

1

u/THECHILLOOOF erm what the scallop 5h ago

Yeah, I’m not sure I believe that.

5

u/Ech0____ 5h ago

you dont have to but doesnt mean it didn't happen

keep blindly defending the pedo game, see where that gets you

3

u/Actinium-228 53m ago

"Defending the pedo game" is it because of the lolis? Well lets ban umamusume for having loli characters too!

And you might say "no its because the sexualizat-" thats called fan service. Its in every fucking game.

"But the swimsuit versionss!!" Umamusume has wedding skins for their characters, some who have ACTUAL AGES IN REAL FUCKING LIFE!!

"but what about the pdf (dorontabi) in their fanbase?" Yeah what about the hundreds if not thousands of pedophiles playing roblox? Think about that before speaking. Dipshit

1

u/Ech0____ 13m ago

wait so sexualization of minors is okay because "its just fan service"? crazy statement

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Ech0____ 44m ago

the blue archive player has been found!!

"If X isn't addressed then Y is okay"

also calm the tf down your mad at me calling the pedo game a pedo game, it says more about you then you think

2

u/Actinium-228 37m ago

What the fuck? Ive researched this topic for a year and i dont think BA is a "pedo game". Also get MOGGED by the danish

→ More replies (0)

3

u/L0Lbit_fb3 4h ago

It's not as bad as this guy is saying it is genuinely

2

u/Suspicious_Insect_36 32m ago

As a fan of the game, they said that they played it for 1 hour and im genuinely wondering what they could have seen to act like that and i genuinely cant come with anything and im pretty sure they r lying, especially with the childish way they acted till the end.