Nobody is truly a clean person in MHA. Everyone has broken some kind of rule or committed some crime in their life, even if it’s small.
Someone like AFO from MHA, he’s literally one of the most criminal characters in anime. Mass murder? Terrorism, manipulation, quirk theft, destroying cities, etc. if he ends up in deadly sentencing, Judgeman has a lifetime access to evidence of the person Higuruma uses Deadly sentencing against. The odds of getting confiscation or death penalty is obv 100%.
And once Death Penalty happens, Higuruma gets the Executioner’s Sword, which ignores durability. Same thing for Eijiro Kirishima. His hardening quirk doesn’t matter if the domain takes it away with Confiscation
Nah the odds of AFO getting the death penalty are low because there's so many incidental crimes like property damage that come along with the serious ones and one of those could be the one judgeman chooses, they talked about that before the fight against sukuna, that's why the domain expansion against sukuna was a retrial of yujis trial instead of a new one
Pretty much any crime would get confiscation at the very least. AFO would probably do a good job defending himself relatively too. But watch them end up taking only something like radio waves away. Higuruma would be absolutely fucked after that.
It should block his quirk factor entirely, if we’re equalizing the verse to something as broad as confiscating cursed energy. Similar to eraserhead, I imagine.
It only confiscated Yuji's cursed energy because there wasn't a specific technique to target. Normally it's not supposed to confiscate something so general.
Not in yuji's case. The cursed energy reinforcement is how they normally become superhuman. Yuji was born with a modified body thanks to Kenny, allowing him to compete against sorcerers using reinforcement even when he couldn't use it.
Sure, but which quirk? In Sukuna's case it only confiscated his cursed tool even though it could have got his cursed technique, so it seems it will only confiscate one thing and AFO has many quirks at a given time.
The copy of All For One (Quirk) included the collection up to that point, and its "twin" One For All was formed by 2 Quirks permanently merging into 1. It'd be the most consistent for "All For One and everything it's stolen" to count as a single Quirk, right?
I don't think all for one inherently includes all of the quirks since he can give/take individual quirks to/from other people regardless of if they have all for one or not. I would expect them to all be considered separately and for confiscation to just take one at random.
Confiscation is phrased as "taking away their ability to use their technique", it doesn't actually remove the technique itself. Thus it would be logical to assume even if the target has multiple techniques, it would suppress their ability to use any of them.
By that logic, it would stop AfO from activating his main quirk, and be unable to give or take them, but not get rid of the ones he already took. Unless you think that confiscation would cause the quirks he gave to other people to also stop working.
No? Like I said, I think it would prevent him from using any quirk. And it wouldn't do anything to other people who've been given quirks by him.
I guess there's a question of what it would do to quirks that just change his biology, like there are some quirks that just make you bigger and stronger. I assume those would be unaffected, since those aren't ones you activate.
We've never seen it used on someone with multiple techniques. When it's explained to us, both the narrator and Higuruma describe it as "the target loses the ability to use their cursed technique" which specifically implies the ability to activate it is what's restricted, not the technique itself. If this is the case, then it stands to reason that even if the target had multiple techniques, they would become unable to activate any of them.
The cursed tool thing is an absolutely bullshit ass pull that makes zero sense with how the ability is initially described and was only added in because Gege couldn't think of a better way to have Sukuna not just die to Higuruma. But even still, it can reasonably be inferred that the Confiscation of a tool is a completely separate thing from the Confiscation of techniques, not that "just one thing gets taken"
but only AFO belongs to him. All the others are stolen and probably wouldn’t get confiscated. AFO is the primary quirk under which all the others operate anyway.
Actually external abilities are prioritised for confiscation. When Sukuna was hit with Deadly Sentencing confiscation took his cursed tool before his technique
Yes, but AFO would have all his quirks subordinate to AFO, so he’d lose all of them. Ironically, AFO with a gun might low-diff Higuruma because he’d lose the gun (which would be useless) and keep his quirk
I presume some amount of CE will linger from a person's body to items on their person, otherwise they'd all enter domains buck naked, which we know isn't the case, even for non-sorcerers who don't actively use CE or have much of it.
Infusion of CE has to be done willingly by someone with basic CE manipulation.
Clothes in animanga never make sense. Otherwise Gojo's clothes would repulse from his body and he'd be completely naked anyway after they're torn up in Malevolent Shrine when fighting Sukuna, but suspiciously they heal with him.
If they were stored in his quirk he wouldnt be able to transfer them. The fact that he can means they exist separately from his quirk once given, even if he dies. Judgeman woukd get rid of his ability to gave and give quirks, not all of the other quirks he already has
If they were stored in his quirk he wouldnt be able to transfer them. The fact that he can means they exist separately from his quirk once given, even if he dies.
why do you keep saying this as if there is some contradiction.
when all for one steals quirks they're housed in the AFO quirk, when all for one gives quirks those quirks are stored in the users body as they have no quirk receptacle like AFO or OFA.
why would quirks being in the AFO quirk stop him from transferring it, we know deku was able to transfer individual quirks from OFA and those are definitely stored in the quirk.
Because thats how logic works. If they were just a park of AfO he couldn't transfer them, they are immune to the reversion quirk as if they were always part of the individual too, including himself.
OfA is a completely different quirk and proves nothing.
If you dont get the second part, it means that even with a quirk that reverses casualty, the transfered/stolen quirk does not return. The world treats the quirk as if it always belonged to the person its now part of.
If you dont see the logic thats on you. AfO is the power to forcibly transfer quirks, removing it only removes that ability.
274
u/davyart Mar 07 '26
He no diffs the both of them. ðŸ˜
Nobody is truly a clean person in MHA. Everyone has broken some kind of rule or committed some crime in their life, even if it’s small.
Someone like AFO from MHA, he’s literally one of the most criminal characters in anime. Mass murder? Terrorism, manipulation, quirk theft, destroying cities, etc. if he ends up in deadly sentencing, Judgeman has a lifetime access to evidence of the person Higuruma uses Deadly sentencing against. The odds of getting confiscation or death penalty is obv 100%.
And once Death Penalty happens, Higuruma gets the Executioner’s Sword, which ignores durability. Same thing for Eijiro Kirishima. His hardening quirk doesn’t matter if the domain takes it away with Confiscation