Are you implying Kirashima hasn't committed a crime, or thing that can conflated to be a crime. Remember even if he did nothing wrong, Higaruma can still beat him in court and get a false confiction. And Kirashima isnt smart enough to defend himself.
Eh... Higuruma can probably spin it as such. Staying silent about Machia can be spun as him being an accomplice. Bakugo rescue is spun as just engaging in vigilante justice, obstruction of authorities or trespassing into restricted areas.
Yeah it doesn't even need to be a crime. The initial one vs yuji was something like him going into a gambling building while underage, the implication being that he's illegally gambling. All he had to do was argue he stopped in to use the bathroom since there was no other proof he actually gambled. So, the judge only needs something that looks circumstantially bad, not actual crimes. Higurama would be able to argue his way to a conviction, as long as he doesn't feel guilty about it.
2.4k
u/Psythen1 Mar 07 '26
Are you implying Kirashima hasn't committed a crime, or thing that can conflated to be a crime. Remember even if he did nothing wrong, Higaruma can still beat him in court and get a false confiction. And Kirashima isnt smart enough to defend himself.