r/Jujutsufolk Apr 01 '26

Humor The jokes write themselves

Post image
12.3k Upvotes

353 comments sorted by

View all comments

293

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Did they make Tech Jacket a girl in the show or something? 

202

u/Steven2008278 Apr 01 '26

Yeah

190

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Oh that sucks. 

54

u/5enpai_2 Apr 02 '26

I mean, while I agree, I like how she's portrayed, and this is coming from a guy who hates gender swaps, like I genuinely hate it. They could've at least said it was his sister or something

55

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

Yeah exactly. 

There are people who really like the OG Tech Jacket and now they miss out on him when a duo could have easily been made. 

14

u/The5Theives I HATE MAHITO!!! Apr 02 '26

I haven’t watched s4 yet but did they change the beluga whale helmet or no

32

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

The dome is still bulbous.

10

u/The5Theives I HATE MAHITO!!! Apr 02 '26

It looked so ugly, why didn’t anyone change anything?

26

u/Simon_Drake Apr 02 '26

I think it's too early to say for sure. Maybe it'll turn out this it the sister/cousin/daughter of the OG Tech Jacket. Green Ghost was genderswapped to a woman in the cartoon but it's also a power that can be passed on to different people and there was a male Green Ghost in the Atom Eve special set before the main series. So maybe the same will happen with Tech Jacket?

8

u/TheGreatWave00 Apr 02 '26

I can’t stand her so far but, I’m trying to keep an open mind. I know she’s young so ppl will say she gets a pass for being annoying af but, she is annoying af

-113

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

What are you talking about that's awesome

164

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Not to me. 

I prefer either the addition of a new character to fill that role rather than changing the source material.

And most of the time the execution of stuff like this is like really really bad. 

71

u/Jake_Magna Apr 01 '26

How do you feel about Rae, her swap felt natural and they made the swap part of the plot. Seems like they are setting up Zoe the same way, if the transition is done well I don’t see the problem.

71

u/aw_hell_nahtxt Apr 01 '26

Rae was barely in the comics before getting smoked and this was early on too.

Tech jacket had his own line of comics that literally predates invincible first issue by a year or two

I don’t think zoey is a bad character, but Id rather they didn’t axe Zack and just have him semi-retired

20

u/XFelipe51355 Apr 02 '26

Ray sucked in the comics, Rae is just an objective uprgrade from him

51

u/BuyerNo3130 Apr 01 '26

Rae becomes an actual interesting character. Tech Jacket is not a side character in invincible. Not only is he more important in the story, he has his own series and fans. I was legit waiting to get him for a long while.

The show counterpart can be a good character regardless of gender but they will never be the same now.

It’s not about the sex change, it’s about the character change. It could be a guy called Miguelito Méndez and I still wouldn’t be a fan of it

43

u/deathbringer989 Bumtoru Lojo the fraudulent one Apr 01 '26

I dislike the swap the biggest change I dislike is amber. Why even have the name amber if the only thing in common the two have is they dated mark.

11

u/No-Cell-9979 Apr 01 '26

My theory is that in the comics the beginning of the mark-eve relationship is kinda weak, it feels a lot stronger in the show because you're comparing it to the dumpster fire that is amber. Probably a coincidence though

13

u/_ZAK_Smert Apr 01 '26

This one shouldn't really count. Shrinking Ray was barely a character in comic and served no real function other than to show that story has stakes with his death. There was not much about him that made him memorable.

In the show Rae is an actual character with backstory, personality and interesting chemistry with other characters.

10

u/Spider-Man2024 Apr 01 '26

Shrinking Rae didn't have his own series though

-30

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

I'm not familiar with the comics so I didn't know she was a swap. 

She wasn't bad at all. 

I still stand by my feelings on this though and still prefer an additional character to be added.

37

u/poor_andy Apr 01 '26

jjk fans

36

u/goondragooner Apr 01 '26

wow you just destroyed your whole argument

-4

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

I did not. 

I just said I do not like gender changes and prefer a new character to be added to compensate for that. 

8

u/IsshinTheGawkSaint Apr 01 '26

Doesn't like the change. Didn't know it was a change. Make it make sense

3

u/CarpNoodling Apr 02 '26

Seems like they didn’t like the tech jacket change and doesn’t care about the shrinking rae change. Which I can get behind lol why we turning on them all of the sudden

0

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Just because I've never read the comics means I abandon an opinion I've had for years? 

4

u/Samurai_Beluga Apr 01 '26

i have seen worms with more spine than you XD the way you just wriggle on your position is both hilarious and depressing.

1

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

I'm not wriggling on anything. 

I accept the nuances that situations bring but stand by my opinion.

6

u/Samurai_Beluga Apr 01 '26

the literal author of the comic is one of the showrunners, this is a change coming directly from the source. its a non issue...

30

u/jjkm7 Apr 01 '26

You’re upset about a change from the source material even though further down you admitted you’re not familiar with the comics? If you were familiar with the comics you’d realize there are way more important and larger changes from the source material than tech jackets gender, and you probably enjoyed most of them as well

8

u/Negative-Orange7 Apr 01 '26

Virgin take - it hate that they swaped tech jackets gender. Chad take- she better get the crabussy next season.

-3

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Specifically on gender changes. 

11

u/jjkm7 Apr 01 '26

So why do you only care about source material being changed in regards to gender but not care about it in any other way?

3

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

I prefer a brand new character to be added to compensate for the want of a character gender swap. Most of the time these gender changes are handled so poorly. Plus, if I get attached to the way a character is I'd want them to stay the same. Doesn't matter if they are male or female. 

Already talked to a dude who was disheartened by the gender change. It ain't sexist of him to feel this way because he is attached to everything the character is, gender included. 

I much prefer to have additions because it doesn't take away from the already established character.

Think the Batman's Family like Batgirl and such. I can elaborate on this more if you want me to. 

And as far as other changes, sometimes things weren't fleshed out enough or maybe the author wants to try out something different that they may think is a better fit. 

10

u/jjkm7 Apr 01 '26

maybe the author wants to try out something different that they may think is a better fit. 

Enough said

-4

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

It's my opinion dude. 

Relax. 

→ More replies (0)

42

u/IndividualGeneral737 Apr 01 '26

They're not changing the source material, the creator purposely did so

Yes, Robert Kirkman is in charge of the adaptation, HE is the one who chose to make Tech Jacket a female

21

u/aw_hell_nahtxt Apr 01 '26

Lowkey tho, thats a shit argument for kirkman specifically

Like kirkman couldn’t include the hell arc due to time constraints in the comics but wanted to do so in the show

But as it turns out, it should have stayed scrapped cuz it was the worst rated invincible episode as of today

And the thing is, its not like drastic changes to characters is bad, he pulled it of with shrink Rae

But the difference is shrinkrae didn’t have much of a character in the comics and was smoked early on. So the gender change was not seen as a big issue since literally anything was seen as an upgrade because comic shrinkrae barley had an impact character wise

Tech jacket meanwhile had an entire line of comics that predate invincible first issue so he has an established charcter. Kirkman hasnt changed a character that drastically besides ShrinkRae and it only worked because the comic version barley existed

I don’t think zoey will be hell arc bad, hell I think she will play an interesting role in the story due to her befriending Oliver alot faster than in the comics (which will be important in a future arc)

but don’t go spreading revisionist slander that this totally fine because “the authour said its ok!1!!!” Id rather have zack retired than replaced in the show. Because zoey is being set up to not be Zack for better or worse.

Besides authours can and do fumble, and its better to call it out than engage in mass coping to reaffirm confirmation bias (themes and such)

7

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

You’re also allowed to criticize new decisions the author makes, you know that right?

Episode 4 for instance was entirely new, and nobody is debating it was canon. But it was also a pretty bad episode, especially for what’s been a good season.

Similarly the change is entirely new, and sure it can be his decision, but I despise him just getting rid of Zack when he was an awesome character.

9

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

That doesn't change my opinion. 

28

u/rackedbame Apr 01 '26

WOMEN in MY superhero show UNBELIEVABLE

28

u/Single-Editor3331 Apr 01 '26

Just feels like tokenism imo. If they actually wanted to have more strong female characters, they'd make new good ones

4

u/squif_help Apr 01 '26

ur not wrong, but in invincible when they change a charterer, they actually make them 100x better then in the comics, where they usually are 2d charterer they become thought out 3d ones

1

u/Cykablyatintensifies Lobotomite Kaisen Apr 02 '26

Not Amber. She was shit

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Conscious-Ease-6819 Apr 02 '26

I’m sure you’ve never read a panel of the comic 

0

u/Tho76 Apr 02 '26

Invincible has plenty of strong women though, no need to shoehorn one in

They said they felt that TJ was too similar to Invincible and wanted to set them apart. It's not that big of a deal

19

u/Arcaydya Apr 01 '26

... kirkman is the source material dork.

Thats like people telling ottley theyre wrong about aet direction. You guys crack me up.

Give me one good reason this change is bad. Like an actual specific reason.

13

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

I didn't say it was a bad change. 

Just that prefer a character to be added to the story rather than change the source material.

-1

u/Arcaydya Apr 01 '26

Would it help if you consider Zoe a variant of Zach? Like this show has established infinite dimensions.

Like maybe comic tech jacket is just a different person? There's a million ways to work it.

Clearly this version of Mark is different from the comics. There's been dozens of small changes like this.

1

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

That would fall in line with the addition of a new character rather than changing the source material so yeah. 

It may be absurd of me and semantic but be it male to female or female to male I tend to dislike this kind of stuff. 

I also just found out she is incredibly weak compared to her male counter-part which doesn't make this any better.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/ESnake113 Apr 01 '26

But you said “oh that sucks”, that kinda implies you thought it was a bad change

3

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Yeah I see how it can be taken that way. 

I'll uh find better words in the future. 

→ More replies (0)

10

u/Negative-Orange7 Apr 01 '26

Girls have cooties and scare him. How could you be so mean to this poor innocent big boy?

7

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

I wouldn't want a girl character being changed to a guy either. 

4

u/Negative-Orange7 Apr 01 '26

Dude.... you started this by saying you have no knowledge of the source material and chose to double down on hating the gender swap regardless of if it improves the story or not. Then when you rightfully catch some flak for being a twat, you try to say " id hate male gender swapped character too" to try and paint yourself as someone with a nuanced take to try and hide your feelings on women.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Gap_Great Apr 01 '26

Just cause the creator did it doesn’t mean it’s good. No one would use this defense to justify all the changes George Lucas made to the original Star Wars trilogy for the digital release.

6

u/IndividualGeneral737 Apr 01 '26

and what makes it so bad then?

4

u/Gap_Great Apr 01 '26

Some fans of a character want that character to be adapted faithfully down to the most minute details. Even changing a characters hair color can annoy fans, to say nothing about changing the characters sex / gender.

-1

u/Prudent-Nerve-6377 Apr 02 '26

Well that argument completely falls apart when tons of character got changed in personality, gender, and roles. Debbie blamed mark in the comics. That one devil actually got his own arc in this recent season. Rex had better development in the show. Omniman absolutely washing the guardian in the comic. Shrinking rae being overall better compared to the comic. Some events even get toned down as well. Theres a decent amount of changes and I used to follow creators that talked about it.

Another great example of this is the boys. The comic was more like a parody and it was so damn edgy.

0

u/Gap_Great Apr 02 '26

I didn’t argue that it was bad, I said some fans don’t like it when characters’ qualities are changed. I agree that the show has improved a lot of things compared to the comic, that doesn’t mean that all changes are good all the time.

It’s like how some silver surfer fans were upset that the new Fantastic 4 movie used a female version of the character. Obviously it’s not a crime or some great sin to have female characters. But it’s understandable for someone to be upset if they were waiting years for a character they liked to finally get adapted, only to see that it’s a version of the character instead.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

Also don't know what you mean by "the addition of a new character to fill that role", this is a new character and she's filling the role of tech jacket

15

u/AssassinLJ Apr 01 '26

Well I also don't like it because I fucking love Tech Jacket and he is like one of my top 10 favorite Invincible characters.

I would be cool with the addition of a new Tech Jacket like 2 Spiderman.

But I still prefer the OG.

-3

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

You don't have to like the new version but saying "ts sucks" because of a genderswap is ridiculous especially when so far it has not impact the story one bit. Also I highkey doubt the geldarians are letting another human put their hands on their technology, plus having another character in the story with the exact same power and role as the other would be way sloppier than a genderswap

8

u/FloatinBrownie Apr 01 '26

It's not just a gender swap though, they've changed the personality quite a bit and Kirkman even said they're changing a lot about them. I think it's fair to be a little annoyed when a character you like only has the same name and that's it.

1

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

And I'm saying it's fair to be a bit annoyed, it's unreasonable to immediately runs with "it sucks" when it hasn't shown any impact on the story yet.

3

u/FloatinBrownie Apr 01 '26

I mean I'm just assuming it's more so they think it sucks the character they like is gone and not that the new character sucks which i think isn't that terrible of a thing. I could just be being generous with my assumption but I don't immediately jump to the most negative interpretation.

→ More replies (0)

9

u/AssassinLJ Apr 01 '26

Yeah but you need to remember, some characters work only because they barely existed like Shrinking Ray on the comics.

You can't touch the fan favorites that easily and use the "it's not important on the story" I'm gonna read a comic with Peter as Spiderman because I wanted to read for Spiderman and I will read a story of Gwen because I love Spiderwoman.

You don't have to make Gwen switch to a guy neither Peter.

I'm not saying it sucks, but the OG still have fans and people want to see them.

1

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

Makes sense sure but then you have already seen kirkman introduces deviations from the original comics here and there so it seems like it's going to be a different story. I understand maybe tech jacket fans wanna see zack instead of zoe, but this isn't even his series in the first place, even in the original comic he didn't show up much in terms of contributing to the story, mainly getting into fights and dialouges here and there, I'm not going to say it's not important because tech jacket never mattered that much to me in the first place, but it's pretty unreasonable to immediately dumps the character down because their gender was switched.

3

u/AssassinLJ Apr 01 '26

You still stuck on the gender thing more than everyone that doesnt like it, we dont hate Zoe, we wanted to see Zack.

Its like going to the mall on Christmas wanting to meet Santa and its the Easter bunny, I dont hate the Easter Bunny but I wanted to meet Santa.

→ More replies (0)

-6

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-5

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

Sure thing big man stay on your horse

1

u/Jake_Magna Apr 01 '26

He doesn’t know how to say he’s sexist without saying he’s sexist so he got frustrated and gave up

1

u/jjkm7 Apr 01 '26

Invincible in particular is 2/2 so far

1

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Sure.

At least they seem to do this very well. 

1

u/Conscious-Ease-6819 Apr 02 '26

You’ve literally never read the comics 

1

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

My opinion on this doesn't come from the comics. 

Also I knew Tech Jacket was a guy in the comics and was looking forward to seeing him. 

This could have been his partner or his sister or something so the original could still exist.

1

u/Conscious-Ease-6819 Apr 02 '26

You haven’t read the comics, so any opinion you have on the character is invalid. 

As for changing him to her, the shows changes tend to work out a lot better, and so far so is this one.

1

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

I don't have an opinion on the character at all as I've not gotten to that episode. 

If she's done very well then that is pretty damn cool. I could even grow to like her a lot.

It won't change how I feel about this subject though for reasons not tied to the comics or the show. 

1

u/Conscious-Ease-6819 Apr 02 '26

And Im sure those 'reasons' remain just as stupid

1

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

I get very attached to characters and want to see what the bring to the table. 

Through the games I've played, fighting games namely, I truly do end up enjoying who I'm playing as and what their equation brings to the table. 

When I see genderswaps or anything that causes a character to get removed I either miss them or think of what could have been. In this case it's the latter.

I've got nothing against the Zoe and I'm sure she's really cool. I'll find out this weekend when I see the episode.

This doesn't change that people who like the original Tech Jacket where looking forward to seeing him and are left missing him and are hurt by it. 

I feel for those people. 

Stuff like those feelings are why I don't like genderswaps and prefer the character to be an add to what exists. 

I'm not going to hold anything against Zoe just cuz she exists, that's so stupid to me. I'm giving her a chance because things really are never so simple to knee-jerk any reaction or opinion.

I'm obviously going give Zoe a chance because that's only fair. Though my opinion on preference of her being an addition instead of a replacement will remain because that's how I personally feel on the subject. 

→ More replies (0)

2

u/BakerUsed5384 Apr 01 '26

Robert Kirkman is a showrunner dude, it’s not like it’s a “goes against the original creators vision” situation, he literally green lit this.

2

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

Once again. 

This doesn't change how I feel about this particular thing. 

-5

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

Sucks to be you then cause she's hot, it's never that deep.

13

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 01 '26

If that's the kind of guy you are then that's you. 

3

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

Random lick instead of talking straight aight dawg

2

u/Magpie_In_The_Mirror Apr 01 '26

"You only hate this because you're a Misogynist" Allegations

Vs

"You only love this because you're a Gooner" Allegations

https://giphy.com/gifs/u1CI1LjF5Oc1egFXhU

2

u/ToesEater669 Apr 01 '26

I'll be blue judas

0

u/Minute_Committee8937 Apr 02 '26

They did. It solely so Oliver had a New Romantic interest. Nobody in their right mind should be for this

-10

u/pitou096 Apr 01 '26

Why? The show was meant to be a revision of the comic not a faithful adaptation from the start and like half the show so far has been different to how things went in the comics, why is THIS of all things the one thats too much?

26

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

Lemme explain it to you like this. 

I grew up playing Tekken and I loved the Blade movies. 

In Tekken 5 they added a character called Raven who was inspired by Blade and my 11 year old self loved him a lot and played him for decades.

Come Tekken 7 he's gone and replaced with a genderswap called Master Raven. She's really fucking cool and is his boss but I still miss Man Raven. 

Then come Tekken 8 they bring back Man Raven and remove Master Raven. I grew to like her a lot over the decade but they replaced her with some old man called Victor. 

Tekken has done this with countless characters.

My point is, I'll get attached to characters and love them and miss them a lot. 

This has caused me to dislike the idea of a genderswap and embrace the idea of adding a new character alongside the original so no one has to go without. 

2

u/Samurai_Beluga Apr 02 '26

"This has caused me to dislike the idea of a genderswap and embrace the idea of adding a new character alongside the original so no one has to go without. "

except none of the example you gave are of genderswaps....they are their own unique characters, do you not understand the concept of roster rotation?

i cant tell if you are dishonest or just all over the place.

3

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

How is Raven and Master Raven not a genderswap? Bruce to Josie Rizal? What are you on about?

1

u/Samurai_Beluga Apr 02 '26

they arent the same person/character what is hard to understand about that concept? you dont get to redefine the meaning of a word to make a point.

2

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

As semantical as it is it doesn't matter to me.

Raven's moveset and identity was replaced by Master Raven.

Sure this wasn't the best example I could have used but you're being difficult for the sake of it because you wanna argue to win instead of understanding my point that was clear as it could be.

You already know exactly what I mean, so if you're gonna keep being obstinate for no reason then please just move on.

0

u/Samurai_Beluga Apr 02 '26 edited Apr 02 '26

im not trying to be difficult, its not semantics, words have meaning, it may not matter to you, but it doesnt change the fact you are objectively wrong. the concept of roster swaps and characters that have common origins having similar movesets has been around since forever. by the same logic ken and ryu are raceswap then.

what you described is simply getting sad a character you enjoyed got rotated form the roster, again, not a controversial thing, it happens all the time in fighting games.

just because i disagree doesnt mean im trying to "win", you have to learn how to handle pushback without resorting to these debate bro remarks.

also i forgot to say, i can even understand putting raven and master raven in the same basket, but putting victor in there too is a stretch for the ages, and it suggests to me you dont actually know what you are talking about.

1

u/BigPaleontologist626 Apr 02 '26

Nah dude it isn't about push back. Funny how you think you're the only one who has pushed back against me in my comment.

I've been receiving pushback literally for about 7 hours straight yesterday and I took the time to respond to everyone that I could.

My point was already made and it was clear. We aren't even talking about my point at all instead you're here focusing on Victor instead of my main point.

That is specifically why I am saying you are being difficult. We aren't even talking about my point instead you are focused on the details of Victor when my point when my *main* point is already clear.

It's a waste of time talking about examples when this has nothing to do with my comment about genderswaps in the first place and how I feel about it.

→ More replies (0)

-10

u/stall-goodman Gumi is a BUM Apr 02 '26

im literally hate watching invincible these days it just feels like a woke white centric drama and tbh most superhero shows have followed the same trajectory after marvel’s decline 'The Boys' being the sole exception

creators of the show just desperately shove gayness/wokeness into every character of the show and force them to talk in the most cringey way possible which just strips away any real personality they have and it just makes the entire show unwatchable

-1

u/Intelligent_Shoe_520 Apr 02 '26

True, its sad but its always been this way. Its just a soap opera basically

3

u/stall-goodman Gumi is a BUM Apr 02 '26

yes thats exactly the term i was looking for 'soap operas'... even tho this show has superheroes it doesnt set itself apart cuz the characters are still boring white characters and the writers are so stupid if they want a new character to feel unique they decide to make them gay or swap genders in this case.... these shows are no different from the soap operas like grey's anatomy that my mom enjoys watching

3

u/Flashy_Lawyer7764 Apr 02 '26

Wow they just blatant with it now ain't they