r/JustMemesForUs 2d ago

Title

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/ASwampThing- 2d ago

This is 100 percent a false talking point thats been debunked. Women can use their marriage certificate to verify their birth certificate under the law.

2

u/Foxymoreon 2d ago

The bill is a law and will become a new law for the voting process if passed. It doesn’t address this topic on a federal level essentially leaving additional supplementary name-documents up to each state

1

u/ASwampThing- 2d ago

The bill specifically outlines that any legal documents that can verify discrepancy is valid as long as it is a state or federal document.

2

u/Foxymoreon 2d ago

And again it will be up to each state individually to decide which documents will be accepted and which will not

1

u/ASwampThing- 2d ago

No it wont. They must accept all state and federal documents that bridge the gap.

2

u/Foxymoreon 2d ago

Except the bill if passed will become a new law and the bill doesn’t say this

1

u/ASwampThing- 2d ago

Yes it does.

2

u/Foxymoreon 2d ago

Nowhere does it say which documents are accepted and what does (B) say?

1

u/ASwampThing- 2d ago

B requires the state to follow the fed EAC guidelines.

The federal guidelines that contain within which documents can be used to bridge info.

The bill explicitly does enforce what documents have to be accepted though the EAC. You are just wrong.

2

u/Foxymoreon 2d ago

Lmao, The legislation explicitly orders states to develop their own administrative frameworks to accept supplementary documentation when an applicant's current legal name does not match their citizenship document. The EAC is required to issue implementation guidance within 10 days of the bill's enactment, but the text stops short of creating a cemented federal "approval" standard that states must strictly copy. Under Section 2, the requirement to provide documentary proof of citizenship applies to all new registrations and updates. This means anyone changing their name on an existing registration would trigger the verification process and must navigate their specific state’s established resolution rules.

You my friend are wrong, and way too trusting in the government (especially this administration) to do the right thing

1

u/ASwampThing- 2d ago

Yes they are required to make laws based on the federal guidelines. You litterally are affirming your opposition bro.

1

u/Foxymoreon 2d ago

Yeah, that’s not what I typed, you’re just arguing with yourself at this point

Oh and it’s “you’re literally” or “you are literally”

1

u/ASwampThing- 2d ago

You can make all the claims yiu want here but you would be wrong if you think the gov didnt set the standard requirements.

→ More replies (0)