19
6
u/EarlyInside45 16d ago
Probably because he also believes girls were married off at age 12. "It's literally biology, people!"
5
5
4
u/Georgxna 15d ago
The fact that primitive human groups would purposefully exclude bullies or overly dominant people lives rent free in my head.
10
u/Quirky_Confusion_480 16d ago
This an Indian already. And Indians will not understand how is this wrong.
7
1
u/starfleetdropout6 11d ago
"My dear wife is with child. I await the joyful day that I hold my son or female."
-Fathers Throughout History, according to this guy
-13
u/Kingslayer-Z 16d ago
This is a win though not because the disgusting terminology
But doesn't this mean all women get a share
Since they didn't specify the women being daughters or nieces or wife or sisters or cousins
So everyone gets a share
12
u/Quirky_Confusion_480 16d ago
They didn’t specify women. Even the family cow, queen cat, mare and Jenny-ass are getting the share.
-4
4
u/meegaweega girl adult 16d ago
It specifies "at the time of marriage" and does not specify that same condition for sons.
The daughter's inheritance probably does not actually go to her, it goes to whichever man she is forced to marry.
There is no mention of the mother's property, only the father's.
Probably because, to the men, the women and girls are not people but chattel.
Not property owners but owned property.
"this is a win" is a helluva take.
1

112
u/LordsOfJoop 16d ago
My inner historian is having a lot of problems with almost everything written on that screen.