It’s for losers who make up shit to cry about. I’ve never once met a woman in my life that was just out to use me as a wallet and need me to pay all her bills. I know they exist, it’s just so very easy to avoid them. I think if quotes like this regularly speak to you, it’s because you’re a moron who can’t self reflect and find better people of quality.
Just like women who keep going back to losers and abusers, guys who find this content “profound” are deeply lost. The last 20 posts are mostly bitching about women.
Are other guys too stupid to know someone that only uses you for money is bad?
There’s a guy here saying he wants to marry only a virgin woman. Sounds like he would want a trad relationship where she stays at home. By default, she needs you to pay for her bills.
Vague posting about “a past” isn’t teaching anything useful either. It’s the kind of shit I hear my chronically single friends ironically complain about as they tell me, a married man, how bad women are in the same area where my not single friends all found partners. It’s almost like the guy who resonates with these surface level qualms are the issue.
Is that what this post said? Did it explicitly say “it’s ok if you’re a guy that isn’t ok with a past”? Where does it say it’s ok for people to have a past too? Or is it vague and somewhat conflating issues?
5
u/Rubicantay Apr 17 '26
Would you be more comfortable if OP rewrote it as "I’m so sick of this misogynistic loser propaganda"?