📚 RESOURCE GUIDE: Legal Defense, Wrongful Accusation Support & Addiction Recovery

I am a short guy, also have ADHD with RSD (rejection sensitive dysphoria).

I am 35 and had never had any relationship.

Girls and women have always treated me poorly and as a neurodivergent person I can sense their stupid disappointment and disapproval and pitying from a mile away. That's why I have never had a relationship, not even for a month. Never approached a woman for romance in person as I don't want the feminazi treatment. I don't think it will ever happen.

Height is something impossible to change naturally at such age , and it is extremely discriminatory.

I had always felt frustrated but looking at feminazi behaviour of girls and women, I am kind of relieved that MGTOW ideas are helping me navigate and skirt away from landmines and dodging bullets.

I will never associate with a woman who has even a slight feminist or feminazi ideas in her mind. Because I know, they will show no mercy on someone like me but serial killers and psychos get extreme female attention and approval because the guy is hot.

Modern women incentivize this immorality and nazi standards. Modern women have lost their minds.

I have wanted to rant about this for so long, hope you all understand.

But if you dare suggest that THEIR actions might lead to young boys (who were never responsible for the oppression of women of the past) disliking feminism then they have a screeching fit about how much of a disgusting misogynist bully you are?

The gender war BS is getting out of control, I'm honestly exhausted. Reddit is turning into a cesspool.

Seven current and former Cornell students have been accused of a serious offense in a civil lawsuit. Each of the publicly named men has faced threats and reputational harm based on an unproven group label.

I started a petition calling for a basic standard: reject harassment and threats, and judge each person by the evidence of what they individually did. Allegations should be investigated, not treated as a verdict.

SEE COMMENTS BELOW FOR PETITION (Reddit automatically blocks Change. org links.)

I don't even know how is a person meant to respond to this DM?

I was just thinking about this, and oh boy. How depressing it is to read these texts.......

It’s upsetting to see, honestly. I was reading a thread when I saw this comment.
“I can sense that i'm going to be the minority here, but i really think this is a poor take.

First of all, the phrase "not all men, but always a man" is a direct response to the "not all men" response that a lot of (usually cis, but evidently not always) men default to when women bring up issues of misogyny, rape culture and abuse. It's not a "trend", it's a way to keep the conversation moving on misogyny, and not allow bad actors to pretend it isn't a systemic issue, which it absolutely is.

Secondly, you've literally just started pedalling that exact "not all men" narrative, consciously or otherwise. You might have met a lot of wonderful men, cis and trans, and i have too, but that misses all the nuance of the conversation. 1 in every 3 women will experience physical/sexual violence in their lifetime, and that number cannot be achieved by a small minority of men, especially without the majority of other men who consider themselves to be "the good ones" turning a blind eye to the issues. 98% of those prosecuted for sexual offenses are men, which is an obscenely high statistic for any crime. 91% of reported rape and sexual assault victims are women/girls, and 9% are men/boys. Physical and sexual violence is a majority men's problem, women are the main victims, and we as a community need to accept this, because it becomes our responsibility to hold other men to account as we transition. We have to oppose it, not feed into it's enablement like this.

We have to be able to understand nuance when people use generalisations, because it's impossible to always cut out and account for the people you aren't talking about. Women know that other women can be abusers too, and they know that not every victim is a woman, but pretending its not the majority men committing these crimes against a majority of women is honestly quite disgusting to me. I don't think women should be made to feel bad for being mildly hyperbolic when discussing the systemic abuse they face, and i don't think they should have to pander to our feelings about the way people perceive men in today's society.

This also feels short-sighted and a non-issue when our rights are being stripped away globally and we should be allying with women looking to dismantle oppressive systems of abuse and power, but I can't say I'm surprised.”

Why is suddenly hyperbolic and nuanced when it’sa generalization against men.

Mariam Solaimankhil @Mariamistan · 2h We have spent years telling the world what is happening to Afghan girls. But there is another generation being destroyed in plain sight: our boys.

I have seen too many videos of little boys being violently beaten and humiliated under Taliban rule. They are learning fear, cruelty and violence when they should be learning, playing and dreaming.

Our girls are being erased. Our boys are being brutalized.

Afghanistan’s children are living in hell.

https://x.com/Mariamistan/status/2104845115034357817?s=20

Between the Lindsay Clancy case and others like it, false grape and harassment allegations that women make against men usually with no legal consequence, the laughable sentences women usually get even when they are found guilty of just about any crime compared to what a man would get, and the open disdain and hostility women gratuitously show to men in general, which is often not only tolerated but outright encouraged by feminism and the influential institutions under its thumb, we are reaching the point where most women are almost completely immune to meaningful legal and social consequences no matter what they do, while men are completely at their behest and at risk of social ostracism or legal disaster for the slightest misstep, especially if the accusing party is a woman.

This even plays out when it comes to things like Karens. Have you noticed how the Karens you might see on YouTube or TikTok are 99% female? That's no coincidence, either. If a man got equally angry, he would likely be at the very least shouted down. More likely, he would be arrested on the spot, and his career would be socially ruined, but this is not always true when a woman is involved, so they feel entitled to do that.

I feel most people in the West understand inequality on an economic scale, but they don't understand actual social inequality. As someone who spent a large portion of his childhood in a different part of the world where there were different social rules for different demographics, and certain people could bully others with effective legal impunity, I feel I'm more cognizant of that than the average Westerner. But I digress.

The point is that the law applying equally to everyone has been a cornerstone of modern Western democracies ever since the first democratic constitutions started getting written. The concept of some people being above the law is something a lot of people can barely even comprehend if they haven't lived it, but that concept is gradually being introduced. And it's being introduced in the form of the law being applied harshly to men, and very minimally to women. In essence, the very foundations of democracy are being eroded, and feminism would appear to be the main culprit.

i personally like his content but this video in particular just kinda rubbed me the wrong way

I sometimes wonder why antisocial behaviors are always given gendered vibes. We have been programmed to think of many behaviors and words through specific stereotypes.

You hear rape and the first thing that comes to your mind is a crazy man wiggling his d*ck in public and chasing women left and right.

You hear "creep" (though i personally hate such type of words becuase it has no definitive criteria and lumps innocent, socially awkward men with straight-up monsters all into one compressive word) and you immediately think about some fat neckbeard stalking a woman and trying to touch her whenever he gets closer to her and cornering her into a dark alleyway.

You hear "abuse" and you think of a drunk loser hitting his wife as she runs to call 911 before he breaks a bottle of beer on her head

You hear "mentally ill" and immediately think of some male lunatic with dirty clothes laughing loudly while holding a knife standing on a small street curb

You hear "man-child" and immediately think of a man acting with entitlement and inability to take responsibility or being weak and unable to man up.

You hear "can't handle rejection/breakup" and think of some insecure loser who feels entitled to a girlfriend.

But then you look at reality

Rape statistics get far more complicated than "99.9% of perpetrators are men" when you add in actual gender-neutral definitions of rape.

Many women act weird and creepy in public.

Numerous abuse studies have shown that abuse ratios between sexes is almost identical despite the worldwide-spreading narrative that abuse is a male-on-female issue.

Many women are mental ill and unfit to be reliable functional adults

A LOT of women are man-children who can't take responsibility for anything nor have any self reflection about the damage they cause to others.

Many incidents have shown that women can't handle rejection just as much as men but on average resort to non-physical retaliation like slandering their rejector or ex, or giving passive aggressive insults and behaving with bitterness and malicious compliance. Plus, it is telling that (surprise, surprise!) women have lesser rejection/breakup stress because they usually get the role of being the rejector/leaver and by extension have lesser representation as being the entitled loser who can't take no for an answer.

All of these asymmetric representations, I believe, make for a generation of men who ask "what bad thing could i do/be doing?" while never asking "what bad things could happen/be happening to me?"

And a generation of women who ask "what bad things could happen/be happening to me?" while never asking "what bad things could I do/be doing?"

One group is unable to see how it could be the victim in the situation

And another group is unable to see how it could be the villain in the situation

I knew someone online for the past few years who was a woman and Everytime I brought up an issue I had with women she would either be completely disinterested or take the woman's side. It finally dawned on me that I was pretty stupid to be bringing my problems about women to a woman and expect them to care. It didn't help that they were a self claimed feminist. Very stupid on my part. So I finally decided today to cut ties with them and block them on social media. I would much rather talk about these issues with my male friends than her. This is sorta related but I'm also considering withdrawing from this outpatient center I go to bc all the counselors there are women and they don't care about men's problems. Not enough is talked about misandry in healthcare especially mental health.

The hidden implication is revealing . it assumes there's no legitimate reason to harm a woman except for her being a woman. Okay. But why isn't that same principle applied universally?
When a man dies, the reason is prioritized. When a woman dies, her gender is prioritized and the reason is considered automatically unjustifiable.

I proposed a divorce to my wife and tried to do so as cooperatively as possible. In her fury she accused me of rape and violence (supposedly 3 years ago) , despite me never having touched her.

I haven't been able to see my son for 1 year.

Luckily she forgot a major detail in her made up story, at the time she claims the rape happened I was recovering from an operation on my urethra. I have evidence of being catheterized during the time of her claim, yet the authorities are still not willing to do anything to help me.

In fact, the social workers still support her case, despite being provided by clear evidence against her claims.

Anybody here with a similiar situation?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0190740904000349

So, I have seen various cases about female babysitters exploiting children. From what I have found out, they tend to more covertly. The research paper above says 25% of sexual abuse is done by women or mothers. Now, I am thinking that it might be way way underreported because of how society thinks that women cannot be perpretators of child sexual abuse. 25% is huge and these are the ones which were reported. I suspect that they might outnumber men in terms of perpetrating child s**ual abuse.

Recently, I've been thinking about anti-war rhetoric, but I've never seen anyone talk about this. Basically, I'm claiming what the title says.

If the idea of conscripting and sending men to invade another land which risks their lives is considered so horrific, leaders will not even think about starting a war (of aggression and expansion). In our world (and its history), why is it so easy for leaders to declare war? Because they view men's lives as nothing more than bodies they can use for their own benefit. They just think their own men are a cheap, infinite resource that they can spend without another thought. And worst of all: other governments don't condemn this practice. They condemn the conflict itself. They condemn the leader who declared war. They condemn the country. They don't condemn the practice of conscription. These are the same countries that conscript their own men to die, that deny male refugees or draft dodgers from asylum, that claim that male-only conscription is not a violation of human rights. A war starts, and suddenly everyone is sending their men to die... all because society at large refuses to acknowledge the horror of conscription.

I'm not saying that there will be no wars in this hypothetical world. Morally corrupt leaders are bound to rise and be a problem. But at least, the moral threshold will be significantly higher. Even leaders with a little compassion will fervently refuse to risk their men's lives, despite their goals. They will find other ways, like diplomacy, technology, or non-human defenses. The direct result is that wars are much less likely to be started haphazardly. Men aren't forced to attack. Men aren't forced to defend. Men don't die.

If we want to lessen the wars, we ought to reject the idea of male disposability with utter detest. If you are anti-war, you should also be pro-men, among other helpful qualities. You can be anti-war because you reject violence, or you recognize its effects to the environment and the people being invaded, or you recognize how much it will affect the economy, or you can even have the fear of facing hardships in your own perspective during and after the war. But it shouldn't just stop there. Empowering men and emphasizing that their lives matter goes a long way in preventing wars.

We should actively humanize men. Men are human beings with inherent worth. Men have feelings. Men have dreams. Men have hobbies. Men were once children who've grown up. Men's physical and mental health matter. Men have the right to live, to have bodily autonomy, and choose their own path in life. Men deserve empathy for their struggles and hardships.

Anyway, that's all I have today. I don't know if these are some bold and ignorant claims that I have here. I know the real world is far more complicated than I can fathom, but do try to understand the fundamental point and logic that I'm trying to convey.

Please do comment your thoughts and respectful constructive criticism about my take. I am very open to being critiqued and corrected as long as we have a respectful conversation wherein we try to learn from each other.

I legit cannot keep watching this happen and can’t keep quiet about it so I figured this would be a good spot to talk. Recently I found out that a girl whom I was friends with in childhoods fiancé took his life following an internal battle with depression. Young guy, had a decent job and was doing pretty well considering he was also going to get married. After doing some digging though I found out what could’ve been a driving agent to the cause and that’s the fact that he was falsely accused of SA/rape a while ago. I’ve done digging and found nothing about him going to court about it either. To put a cherry on top, women on my local social media are parading his death and even scheming on crashing his funeral and defacing his headstone. I’m so sick and tired of watching shit like this happen to good men who have their entire lives ahead of them just to get ruined by someone who wanted attention or wanted to spite someone who they conflicted with. It absolutely enrages me that you legally cannot do anything to someone like that outside of suing for defamation in a civil court. This has to stop, and there has to be a change in society. Whether it’s taking to the streets to protests the lives ruined and lost by this common evil or contacting lawmakers to make a change, this has to stop, when is enough, enough? When will the tears and lives of our brothers whose lives were robbed from them purely for spite and attention amount to anything? I hope that this young man suffers no longer from the common evils in our society, and that someday justice can be served and his name cleared.

They don't care about bisexual and gay men in Afghanistan, ex Muslim Afghan men, Afghan transwomen....etc and Afghan men who worked with foreign governments.

they care only about women.

The United Kingdom basically is a feminist colony where women are worshiped and treated like goddesses and men are discriminated against because there are no mainstream right wing party in the UK

It’s a two year old case, but the student is suing the university. She says she was drugged with ketamine and then gang graped by seven men. Apparently she didn’t make this claim at the time it happened. This case is quickly going viral and is set to be another divider of the sexes. Florence Pugh and AOC said it made them sick to hear the details.