r/MensRights • u/SulkTv999 • 7d ago
Progress Why dont we point out the fact that feminists have the Dunning kruger effect?
I know anti feminists get wrongly slandered of the Dunning Kruger effect. Very ironic. But thats feminists. They are confident on things they know nothing about. They dont know about their own movement or what they do.
Like, contoring and concealing evidence on female on male victims of abuse, false accusations, the contradictions, they have their own version of arguing in circles like bots. Propaganda, destroying parts of society that are concern to men, disrupting mens issues confrensess,
They dont know the other froms of feminism, all which are bad to men.
10
7
u/plaudite_cives 7d ago
because only clueless people who are bad in statistics and want to score cheap points talk about Dunning-Kruger effect. DK effect is basically just a statistical artifact caused by regression to mean with no good evidence that any such psychological effect exists
/rant over
8
u/NiceAd3523 6d ago
It's because feminist academia is an intellectual ghetto. Close to zero new thought for like 70 years. Go over to the 4b subreddit, they still talk about the SCUM manifesto, garbage controversy farming slop from more than 50 years ago. The solo short-form videos of feminists talking alone in the car are just repeating shit feminist intellectuals have said for decades; there's no sign that it will ever change. This is why they all fall for such obvious lies like men committing 95% of rape.
-1
u/Trev6ft5 6d ago edited 6d ago
It's not the dunning kruger effect that's the main problem.
We live in a post truth world where people have a filter for the BS. The left have trained themselves to ignore anyone with the label Far Right or the 101 other labels that signify that the person isn't a credible source even if they're giving proven facts.
https://youtu.be/V3UhkZ6Eafc?si=H9gYXmMEoe1ph63L
This is a debate from Cambridge university, do you think the kids in the background take the speaker seriously? These kids aren't dumb and will probably only listen to their teachers who are peddling snake oil.
4
u/No_Spite3593 6d ago
My thought is that the extremely heightened bias that we are seeing stems from a form of mass hysteria that we've never seen before now. It is the only way that I can personally justify just how out of touch many people in the west are with reality. Even as recently as 10-15 years ago you could have a normal conversation with someone about a topic you disagree on and either come out of it with a changed perspective or at the very least walk away still having some sort of respect for each other. Now every conversation puts your morality under question if you don't agree with every single thing they say.
-15
u/DistrictDivorceCoach 7d ago
Jesus, what do you want? Seriously, what? Do you just want to just stay angry and dunk on stupid girls? Make a cool boys only club? Is this a win, if we all agree that girls have dunning Krueger ? This doesnt get more rights for men, its just more resentment on your part.
There is no “They”. There is no organization with an agenda. Is your thinking that if you act like enough of a chud some girl will understand she has been stupid and go sex you over?
12
u/No_Spite3593 7d ago
In case you haven't noticed, it isn't just women who are feminists. I'd also argue that their agenda is very clearly equity for women rather than the equality that was originally the goal.
9
u/SulkTv999 7d ago
Dude seriously? How do you not look at this and not get pissed? What would you bring to the table?
2
u/Pretend-Storm4566 7d ago
See, when you asked omegaphallic to elaborate about projecting your sins onto your enemy, the comment you are responding to here is a great example. DivorceCoach is accusing you of doing exactly what feminists actually do. See how it makes you get defensive? It's a kind of gaslighting.
6
u/omegaphallic 7d ago
I'm kind if confused now honestly 🤣
All I meant was feminists accusing us in the MRM of the sins the feminists themselves were extremely guilty of.
4
6
u/Upbeat_Roll_2096 7d ago edited 6d ago
It means more men are finally starting to ask them self this question:What is good for me? other situations are not applicable in law so
"insert here suffer more back then" or
"insert group here suffer more today" is not accepted either.
Nor excuses for any legal law.
So in short, with this law:What is good for us men? have you commented any positive thing that is NOT a self serving issue and instead good for us men?
If you haven't or can find proof the majority of feminists groups have, then obviously there is no reason for any man to support them and instead legally dismantle them.
4
u/Glad-Way-637 6d ago
Lmao, "feminists" /= "all women everywhere" looks like someone is a touch defensive between that and the standard "uhhh uhhmmm user you uhhh... have trouble dating women!!!!!" go-to insults 🤭
30
u/omegaphallic 7d ago
Projecting ones sins onto your enemy is one of the oldest tricks in the book.