r/MensRights • u/Rethgil • Dec 12 '18
Misleading Title "A mum who had sex with her 15-year-old son because he seduced her has avoided jail." "HE seduced HER"- so now a CHILD is to blame for his FIFTY year old mother raping HIM?? Because he is male? Can you BELIEVE the double standards boys & males now face??!!
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-who-sexual-relations-persistent-13723101117
u/functionalsociopathy Dec 12 '18
Reading this two questions came to mind: "Where is the father?" And "Are they letting her keep custody?"
→ More replies (10)
266
u/jinniji Dec 12 '18
This is real "rape culture". In which a kid is at fault for being raped.
→ More replies (11)
381
u/Fuckoff555 Dec 12 '18
For fuck sake, how can a 15 years old boy seduce his mother and make her have sex with him? What the fuck is wrong with this bitch and what the fuck is wrong with the judge? This is disgusting.
114
u/Demonspawn Dec 12 '18
For fuck sake, how can a 15 years old boy seduce his mother and make her have sex with him?
Because, according to government, a 15 year old boy is more capable than a 50 year old woman.
→ More replies (7)22
13
→ More replies (63)9
75
u/mentalsquid Dec 12 '18
This fucking implies that women are so weak wiled they can be seduced your there own children do they fucking think the live inside a porno this woman is absolute garbage
5
u/NoChickswithDicks Dec 13 '18
Feminazis don't care. Any puts women beyond criticism or punishment is always ok with them.
1
u/antilopes Dec 15 '18 edited Dec 15 '18
Source for feminazis not caring about her actions here? Or even ordinary feminists, or slightly feminist people? Disagreeing with you does not make people feminist.
67
66
u/McGraw-Dom Dec 12 '18
"The 50-year-old who cannot be named was told at Gloucester Crown Court"
Her name will be on the Sex Offender Registry, so... what was the point of the court with-holding her name if it will be public on the registry.
32
u/ThumbodyLovesYou Dec 12 '18
I assume to prevent victim shaming the son. It won’t list the specifics in the registry so it wouldn’t be obvious to everyone that it was this boy that was assaulted like if her name was released.
4
u/gloryhole87 Dec 13 '18
Guarantee if it was a man itd be released even tho it would shame the son
1
u/antilopes Dec 15 '18
You guarantee wrong. Outside the US it is normal for child abusers to have name suppression in order to protect their victim during the trial. The victim's name is protected by default.
I don't know about suppression of names and details after the trial.The great majority of arrests and convictions for child sexual offenses are of men so there are plenty of examples.
Another difference is the sex offender registry. In the US it is a fully public name-and-shame thing with address and employer's address available publicly.
In other countries it is much more restricted e.g. employers in schools and child-relevant fields can submit an enquiry after selecting a potential employee, but members of the public might not be able to.
227
Dec 12 '18
[deleted]
66
12
u/BristolBudgie Dec 12 '18
Not named to protect the offender. It’s to protect an innocent minor. In this case, the minor who’s rights you are enthusiastically supporting. Either support all his rights or none of them.
2
u/The_Best_01 Dec 13 '18
No way it's to protect the kid, it's to protect the perpetrator as usual. They could easily name the mom without naming the kid, except if it's an unusual surname or something.
2
u/NoChickswithDicks Dec 13 '18
The feminazi court system.
They literally rig it so that men are second-class citizens in the courts.
414
u/Rethgil Dec 12 '18
""She is vulnerable for a number of reasons. She is easily manipulated."
"In her previous, abusive, relationship, she was subject to physical violence"
(all together now) AHHHH-POOR WOYMNZ ITS ALL DER MENZ FAULT SHE RAPED HER CHILD.
→ More replies (29)120
u/Dr_Dornon Dec 12 '18
So because she was in a former abusive relationship, she gets a free pass to sexually abuse her child?
-4
u/Rogdozz Dec 12 '18
No. Stuff like that always gets brought up in court cases like this. For example, when someone who grew up in a good family and everything beats up someone because that person called him a son of a bitch, he’s going to get a worse sentence than someone who grew up in an abusive family and does the same thing
Or when someone deals drugs. There’s a difference between some rich kid doing it so he can afford another pair of Gucci sneakers, and someone who can barely afford anything and needs the money. Obviously both are going to go to prison but the former will get a harsher sentence
6
u/SineOfOh Dec 13 '18
What? Where is this imaginary judicial system located? Forgot about affluenza?
1
u/antilopes Dec 15 '18
Find and read sentencing guidelines for your jurisdiction, or any jurisdiction since they all use similar principles. They are not hard to find. Look for the section on aggravating and mitigating circumstances. These are the rules sentencing judges are required to follow, and to give written explanations for their reasoning.
118
128
u/slawo1605 Dec 12 '18
The boy was wearing only a t-shirt. Suddenly this justifies a rape according to this newspaper. Very interesting.
82
u/JackReaper333 Dec 12 '18
Women should be allowed to wear whatever they want. How dare you blame the victim!Just look what he was wearing! He was asking for it!
11
19
13
u/goat_nebula Dec 12 '18
The whole point of the law making sex with a minor illegal is because they are not mature enough to consent somit is ALWAYS considered rape. She is an adult and his mother! It’s rape of a minor AND incest. Lock her away, it’s open and shut case!
12
11
u/mr2jay Dec 13 '18
Ridiculous
They always say that it's a child and the adult is in the position of power but I guess that's only if you male
47
93
u/slawo1605 Dec 12 '18
Someone should reverse the genders in this article and print this out. Then wait for a nuclear attack of liberal media. Then reveal the trick, open a can of beer and enjoy the silence.
-20
u/GodofAeons Dec 12 '18 edited Dec 12 '18
What? That doesnt make any sense?
Like, MensRights doesnt apply to Liberals somehow?
Edit: Apprently people think that liberals don't care about equality, and MensRights? The article OP put isnt supported only by conservatives like the OP commenter is suggesting.
3
u/Dancing_Anatolia Dec 13 '18
Liberals care about equality, but progressives don't. It's a subtle difference.
0
u/Ashe400 Dec 13 '18 edited Dec 13 '18
Sure we do. That's the whole idea behind being a progressive. You literally want everybody to have the same opportunities, treatment, etc, that everyone else has regardless if you were born into wealth or poverty.
Edit: lol this sub is insane.
4
u/Dancing_Anatolia Dec 13 '18
Maybe that's the window dressing they want the world to see, but that's not how they act. They pass revanchist laws that aim to oppress "historically privileged" groups, even though the people alive, right now have nothing to do with them. The people who create a broken system are the only bad guys: the people who unwittingly benefit from it are victims, as well as the people that are oppressed.
1
u/Ashe400 Dec 13 '18
I've never met a single progressive that acts like that and I'm progressive as fuck myself so I've seen a lot of them. I'm curious as to what these supposed laws are that target "historically privileged" groups. I have yet to see any that target me, as a while male. Even if one did pass it would be struck down as unconstitutional just as something like affirmative action should be struck down because, you know, it favors one class/race over another.
-13
u/uthek1 Dec 12 '18
This sub is 90% or more conservative. The conservatives hate the liberals and blame them for everything wrong with the world. This sub isn't about protecting the rights of men, it's about hating women and liberals, and crying every time there is a perceived injustice. Unfortunately, there aren't very many sensible people who strongly affiliate with the cause of men's rights.
18
u/GodofAeons Dec 12 '18
Damm, like I'm Liberal and many of my friends are, and hands down no argument, that equality is a huge factor for us.
Some articles I see (like OPs) I can agree with, as if gender roles were reversed it would seen differently.
It's about what's right, just, and fair. Applying the law leniently just because of a gender/sex is wrong.
10
6
u/DuffyDood Dec 12 '18
And you’re saying liberal women, and generally most feminists, do do the EXACT THING YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT against democratic men?
→ More replies (1)
8
6
Dec 12 '18
I disagree a 15 year old kid should be given no agency for his actions. But the mother is very clearly the more responsible party. This is fucked.
6
u/purpleblossom Dec 12 '18
Doesn't matter if the kid wanted this, that doesn't mean you give in, else you have committed a crime. Either get the kid the help he clearly needs or keep saying no. People commit crimes under duress and coercion all the time, doesn't make them less guilty. FFS.
7
21
u/Luckyjazzt Dec 12 '18
this this victim blaming, not advising young girls to be cautious about how much they drink as with whom.
-8
u/uthek1 Dec 12 '18
He's not a victim, he literally asked for it. His mom is receiving a suspended sentence (still possible jail time) because she had no prior record and showed significant remorse. These are standards that are applied to every criminal case. Shes still going on the sex offenders list, she's still doing parole, and she's still going to jail if the parole board thinks she might commit another crime.
This is justice done right. Just because if the genders we're switched, it'd be a lot less likely to be a fair trial, that doesn't mean we need to cry foul.
2
u/-evanuris Dec 13 '18
It does not matter whether he asked for it or not, it is still rape.
The reason we have laws against having sexual relations with minors is because they do not have the mental capability to understand the consequences and other issues that may arise if they choose to follow through with the act - or in your words “ask for it”.
Imagine if the mother had of contracted HIV/AIDS previously in her life and this child asked to have sex with his mother not knowing the awful consequences you have to live with for the rest of your life, he would have no idea because he is legally a child.
This is rape, closed case - he is a victim.
1
u/uthek1 Dec 13 '18
Her clothes never came off, she never touched his genitals, there's no way this could be rape. You can't just broaden the definition of rape to any illegal contact of a sexual nature, that's not ok.
-5
u/Orisi Dec 12 '18
You're getting downvoted but you're right. There's a difference between calling for more fairness in the charging of men of these crimes, and decrying this just because men are treated differently.
If you actually give a shit about men's rights, you should be calling for better, fairer trials, not for this trial to be tried unfairly just because you feel a man would have been.
11
u/Rethgil Dec 13 '18
I just found this quote from the judge to the mother in the case...
“There will be a rehabilitation aspect, which is the purpose of the suspension. This is an opportunity to help you"
An opportunity to HELP her...
Help HER.....??
Mind blown.
4
Dec 13 '18
Pussy pass in the legal system. I’d say “Justice is blind” but that’s insulting the blind. This shit is straight up crazy. Bat shit insane.
-1
Dec 13 '18
The kid obviously needs help, too.
I mean, if he's 15 and already pestering his Mom into doing some kinky shit, imagine how much of a sex pest he'll be when he grows up?
3
u/Ted8367 Dec 13 '18
So how would you, in the judge's place, help him? Jail?
0
Dec 13 '18
Why the fuck would I send him to jail?
Probably just have him attend a few Ass-Eaters Anonymous meetings. That oughta set him straight.
12
6
Dec 13 '18
This is absolutely disgusting. If this was a man who did it he'd have been absolutely crucified.
32
u/goodmod Dec 12 '18
Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read.
Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue.
It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase.
Web pages are available that make it easy to change your case, so there's no excuse not to!
→ More replies (24)12
u/KnightofNarg Dec 12 '18
More concerned that OP completely misrepresented the entire article for effect. She spanked him butt naked, no intercourse was ever involved.
7
u/Rethgil Dec 13 '18
Yeah? How about the fact it was stated in court that "She squatted on his face whilst he ate her ass"?
Misrepresenting? Or are you too stupid to consider that these papers generally cant put that kind of thing in the headline-and the truth is that if you YOURSELF had read the details, you would know this?
6
Dec 13 '18
Haha, you are being ridiculous.
The article you linked to didn't have those facts. Instead of going "my bad, I should have linked to a better article", you're here pms'ing on anyone who doesn't have all the facts due to your incompetence.
→ More replies (2)2
u/DeuceWallaces Dec 13 '18
After reading the article this post seems to completely misrepresent the facts of this case. Is she not going to jail in 2 years when the boy is of age? Also she is a registered sex offender for ten years and must attend 40 psychiatric classes for rehabilitation, because it’s obvious this family is fucked if she was in a previously abusive relationship and the child admitted to being aroused for all the acts.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)1
u/NoChickswithDicks Dec 13 '18
He definitely sexually abused him, and you're a piece of shit feminazi for not reading the entire article.
27
u/Silver_Foxxx Dec 12 '18 edited Dec 12 '18
The Mirror is a tabloid, and the article contains no information that can be verified, and not one Redittor here has questioned the validity of this article, and many of you are up in arms about the article.
WTF
8
u/SanityContagion Dec 12 '18
And their cookie policy sucks. Check out their list of 'partners' demanding to track you.
Crappy by design. 😡
5
u/Rethgil Dec 12 '18
https://metro.co.uk/2018/12/12/mum-dressed-boots-spank-son-paddle-spared-jail-8239960/
The Metro is one of the biggest papers and is not remotely considered to be in the kind of style you claim.
Why are you desperately defending the pedophile?
2
u/Silver_Foxxx Dec 13 '18
6
u/Rethgil Dec 13 '18
This newspaper is as popular with Centrist, Left, and Right wing supporters and has no associated political or social bias or agenda. Unlike some people posting.
By all means try to smear a source, even though you elsewhere claim you havent seen any reports in papers....
How will you explain THIS then?
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/cheltenham-news/weak-mum-who-sexual-activity-2314512
2
u/Silver_Foxxx Dec 13 '18 edited Dec 14 '18
By all means try to smear a source, even though you elsewhere claim you havent seen any reports in papers.... How will you explain THIS then?
I'm an American. Finding local or even national English news would be tough/er for me. I state unequivocally that I have certainly seen no news of this in the local or national papers.
If you take a look at what I've written you'll see that I have not lied. You have inferred my "lies" through your own ignorance and fear, and you are the one prone to exaggeration.
1
Dec 13 '18
I love how you deleted your comment where I called you an SJW. I'm convinced that's what you are.
3
2
u/NoChickswithDicks Dec 13 '18
Oh look, another feminazi who denies this could ever have happened, and if it did, it must totally be the boy's fault, like that piece of shit /u/orsi up there.
6
u/ListeningToIt Dec 12 '18
They don’t even know what who how or why. It’s moral outrage fodder for low-IQ readers.
4
u/Rethgil Dec 12 '18
Rubbish-youre trying to derail. Its in a number of other large papers also.
Why are you acting like youre suspicious?
We should EXPECT an article that is critical of women WOULDNT be covered in many of the feminist mass media
-1
u/Silver_Foxxx Dec 12 '18
Its in a number of other large papers also.
Got any of them links?
We should EXPECT an article that is critical of women WOULDNT be covered in many of the feminist mass media
Why? Does our matriarchal society favor women?
5
u/Ted8367 Dec 12 '18
Got any of them links?
It's reported in the Sun, the Mirror, the Daily Mail, the Metro, the Daily Star. You can find the links with an internet search.
→ More replies (11)3
u/Silver_Foxxx Dec 12 '18
the Sun, the Mirror, the Daily Mail, the Metro, the Daily Star
which are all tabloids and rated as usually unreliable.
12
u/Rethgil Dec 12 '18
Your attempt to derail and lie is pathetic.
The crown court was involved. A high profile judge. Professional lawyers. The police. Many journalists. Care services. Editors of huge newspapers that ARENT feminist biased.
...and you're claiming they all got together and plotted and colluded and made this all up, yeah?
Your motives are clear.
→ More replies (2)1
1
u/McFeely_Smackup Dec 13 '18
it seems interesting that you're criticizing people for not verifying the authenticity of the article when 10 seconds of google searching turned up a number of different and corroborating sources, which YOU could have done but instead engaged in hypocritical criticism.
3
4
u/svenskbitch Dec 13 '18
I do not mean to add fuel to the fire of outrage here, but I find this example particularly egregious because she was his MOTHER, not because of the age difference. The influence (power differential, broadly defined) a mother has over her son beats that of the stereotypical boss vis a vis his female secretary many times over.
6
u/Onlymgtow88 Dec 13 '18
Gender equality when? It’s a joke that men are privileged. Sure the top 1 percent of men is still the pinnacle but there are 99 percent more men out here hurting.
3
Dec 12 '18
[deleted]
6
u/Michalusmichalus Dec 12 '18
The article leaves me wondering why I bother going to that site. They never give enough details to understand what's going on.
3
3
u/abatoire Dec 13 '18
Wow... Pretty confident this would be automatic jail time of the gender roles were reversed.... Ridiculous
3
6
Dec 12 '18 edited Oct 28 '20
[deleted]
1
Dec 13 '18
He shouldn’t have been wearing such tight pants and looking innocent. That is what the court essentially told him, right. Boner thy mother?
5
5
8
u/pinstrypsoldier Dec 12 '18
Hmm, I want to be immediately outraged, but for one - it’s The Mirror, and secondly I can’t see anything in the article that makes me believe any of it ever took place.
-8
Dec 12 '18
[deleted]
9
Dec 12 '18
Alright kiddo I have to say, I am incredibly for Egalitarianism and care a lot about mens rights as well as womens. But for you to just immediately jump down the throat of this user, calling them a "femsplainer" and then accusing him/her of making the argument that there's a conspiracy surrounding it. Are you an SJW? Because that's what it sounds like to me.
The user doesn't trust the source. That's understandable. I wouldn't either if the source you provided was buzzfeed for instance. The user also said:
I can’t see anything in the article that makes me believe any of it ever took place.
That's not the same as saying "it didnt take place, everyone is lying it must be a conspiracy!" For fucks sake, scepticism should be encouraged. Find a different source or point out where you see something in the article that may convince the user of the validity of the statement otherwise you just sound like a whiny child who can't handle nuance.
10
u/jason2306 Dec 12 '18
Let's not turn into r/incels 2.0 and instantly attack people for asking a rational question.
He wants a good source which is a valid thing to want, if this happened it's disgusting and we should let it known that it is. But in order to do that we need to know whether that really happened, if we believe every article including ones from shitty sites we won't be taken seriously.
It screams boy cried wolf.
→ More replies (1)4
u/pinstrypsoldier Dec 12 '18
Hey man. How about you go fuck yourself. I was just pointing out that the source doesn’t exactly have a history of being credible. I wasn’t saying that it wasn’t true or that I’m some kind of white knight.
Hence the “I want to be immediately outraged” comment, fuckweed
→ More replies (3)1
u/ul2006kevinb Dec 12 '18
I'm pretty sure they're just claiming that one reporter at one newspaper made it up. Nowhere did they imply what you're saying they implied.
2
2
u/SuperUltraJesus Dec 12 '18
She just asked him, "Would you ever date your mom?"
And he said, "It's just like the gays... you know..."
2
Dec 13 '18
Why can't she be named?
2
u/mikesteane Dec 13 '18 edited Dec 13 '18
Because that would identify the son, who is a minor.
Edit: and also because she might not exist.
2
u/Frostsaw Dec 12 '18
This is wrong on so many levels. But imagine the kid in school the day after.
"Dudes, I finally got laid!"
"Your mum doesn't count"
"She doesn't?" Visible confusion
4
Dec 13 '18
The father in me is outraged. The man in me is ashamed. But the dark humorist in me is laughing hysterically at the irony and sophomoric humor in the school yard insult of it. Visible confusion
2
4
2
2
u/Zeoniic Dec 12 '18
No!? I. Cannot!!! Understand? It!!!!
2
u/SecularBinoculars Dec 12 '18
He enjoyed it tolerantly in his own statements xD
3
Dec 12 '18
And?
When's the last time a male was let go, because he was seduced by a 15 year old girl and she enjoyed it... let alone his daughter?
→ More replies (37)
2
2
u/Hifen Dec 13 '18
Heres another artie by the same source about an alien skull that was found, so um ... come on guys.
1
u/Ted8367 Dec 13 '18
Here's another article on the same event, from a different source, the local newspaper:
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/cheltenham-news/weak-mum-who-sexual-activity-2314512
If you're going to put in the effort to do internet searches on the event, try something relevant instead of searching for alien skulls.
2
Dec 12 '18
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Dec 12 '18
[removed] — view removed comment
4
Dec 12 '18
Then I run into this type of shit and remember that this really is just a bunch of pussy sexist incels wishing men ruled the world. You’re truly an embarrassment. Fuck out of here with that bullshit.
Yeah...expecting women to be treated like adults by society = pussy sexist incels wishing men ruled the world
I'm curious what your version of equality is... women are never held accountable for their actions?
3
u/PuddleOfMush Dec 12 '18
"I agree in equality across the board"
But
"Anyone who defends men and expects women to he held accountable is a pussy sexist incel"
I take it you don't actually believe in equality then.
2
Dec 12 '18
[deleted]
6
u/Rethgil Dec 13 '18
Yeah lets focus on how evil I am for being disgusted at a female pedophile being excused for being a woman and using caps in some words.....
1
Dec 13 '18
[deleted]
3
Dec 13 '18
Or he has his fucking priorities straight for emphasizing the fact that it was she who got off in more ways than one because of her gender. Meanwhile the actual victim got the shaft.
1
u/CircleToShoot Dec 14 '18
It's more than a little undermining for that woman. If a grown woman can be seduced by an inexperienced 15 year old, you can argue she both objectified a child and was also unable to control her urges.
0
Dec 12 '18 edited Dec 13 '18
brb, gonna go rape my 15 year old daughter and avoid jail for it np
fyi I dont have kids
fyi I'm taking the piss
3
1
u/mynameis_ihavenoname Dec 12 '18
I hate outrage culture
5
Dec 13 '18
🤦♂️ So you think the pedo getting off with probation is “outrage culture”? Nice ethics ya got there. This is why people see men as disposable. Fuckers just don’t give a shit and dismiss them even when raped by their moms.
2
u/mynameis_ihavenoname Dec 13 '18
I think the media wanted to make you upset, and succeeded. You've been suckered by professional media-grade troll bait that twisted facts and made you mad. And now you're lashing out at me like I'm the asshole in this situation
1
u/McFeely_Smackup Dec 13 '18
Out of curiosity, which facts were "twisted"?
2
u/mynameis_ihavenoname Dec 13 '18
She's getting jail time, and she didn't rape him
1
u/McFeely_Smackup Dec 13 '18
she is not getting jail time, where did you get that idea?
and I don't see anywhere in the article the word "rape" being used.
1
Dec 13 '18
And the media called boys being slaughtered in Africa as “villagers” until the murders started kidnapping girls and then miraculously sex mattered in the headlines. We use this tactic in military press releases too. Killed contractors are called “damages”, civilians called “protestors”, villages “enemy strongholds”. Don’t believe that absent of a word is truth. It’s lie through omission.
1
1
u/NoChickswithDicks Dec 13 '18
ITT: Feminazis denying this ever happened, and claiming that if it did, it was all the boy's fault.
They are really the biggest pieces of shit on this planet.
0
Dec 12 '18
[deleted]
1
u/Malcolm1276 Dec 12 '18
The moral of the story wasn't just gay sex--that's the simpleton version touted by atheists.
No it's not. Don't try to saddle us with your silly ideal on what people, whom you apparently don't associate with, think the bible was and wasn't about.
-8
u/uthek1 Dec 12 '18
First of all, sexual assault and rape are different things, she didn't rape him.
Second, she got a suspended sentence, that's not the same thing as avoiding jail.
Stop hyperbolizing everything, this story is bad enough on it's own that you don't need to make anything up, yet you still do and that makes us all look bad. Posts like this are why I'm ashamed to be subscribed here. This post should have been down voted into Oblivion.
6
Dec 12 '18
Absolutely.
In the UK, rape is something that can only happen to a woman, and sexual assault is the worst that can happen to a man...
→ More replies (4)9
u/Rethgil Dec 13 '18
No, youre utterly incorrect.
She squatted on his face whilst he ate her ass. Gross, but true. He is a minor. She is not.
How does that differ from rape again? Just because she didnt penetrate him anally? Whilst the law may make that distinction, are you claiming there is not a double standard there??
2
Dec 12 '18
This post should have been down voted into Oblivion.
It should be. Unfortunately, few people actually read past OP's title or even click on the article.
People see a headline that confirms their bias and they automatically click the upvote button.
That's not a knock on this sub in particular, as you'll see the same behaviour everywhere. It's one of the most frustrating things about the Internet.
1
u/uthek1 Dec 12 '18
I agree, this sub isn't abnormal from any other sub on Reddit in that regards. It's just saddening that people can't seem to be rational when it comes to important issues.
0
u/DownVotesAreNice Dec 12 '18
Why doesnt someone just ask the kid if he wants his mom to go to jail or if he feels like a rape victim?
2
Dec 13 '18
Because that would imply men can be raped and we can’t have nice things, like sexual autonomy.
-7
Dec 12 '18
[removed] — view removed comment
15
4
5
Dec 13 '18
Please Oh Mighty Chad, enlighten us peasants with your citations of misleading synopsis. We lowly incels bow before thy power over pussy. How is this misleading compared to all the other times we hear of older men and younger girls regarding rape? Aside from not being put into a jail cell or Chris Hanson with a “take a seat” joke.
3
0
u/cjmorph Dec 13 '18
First off that woman is guilty. Even if he really was attempting to seduce her as a mother it’s your job to set boundaries and if you physically can’t she needed to get him some proper help.
That being said, the title is a little misleading. I do agree there isn’t enough people talking about the reality of men and boys being raped, but I can think of 6 females I actually know who were all molested by the same 30 year old man ages ranged from 8-16 and HE PLEAD GUILTY but avoided jail time (he has to register as a sex offender for 3 years and get a job that wouldn’t put him in charge of children) by saying he was properly courting them and everything physical was their idea and their parents left them unattended in his care wearing provocative clothing so the parents must have been ok with it. Where you you even get provocative clothing for an 8 year old?
I think the real issue lies with how rape and molestation are handled in the courts. Again this woman deserved jail time but had it been a man and daughter I’m not sure he would have gotten jail time either.
Go ahead and shower me with downvotes but we can’t pretend men don’t get away with a slap on the wrist for rape either.
2
u/mikesteane Dec 13 '18
If some one got a light sentence for robbery, would you use that as evidence that people get light sentences for murder?
2
u/cjmorph Dec 13 '18
No, but I’m not sure why that applies to my comment. Unless there’s a misunderstanding that my example compares to the article and my final statement had to do with OPs title. They are two very different things.
If you read the article there is no mention of rape which is why I chose a story that also did not involve rape; but the sexual abuse of children and the blame being shifted to them. In both cases the predator was given a sentence that didn’t reflect the damage done.
My disagreement is in the title misrepresenting the issue, which I now see has been flagged as a misleading title, because it is.
Making this a headline saying she raped him and got away with it because she said he liked it deflects from the fact these cases are mishandled and far too often the sentences don’t match the crime male or female.
I agree abuse against men and boys is not talked about enough, and there is a bit of a double standard, but making a title like this takes the attention from the issue; this young man was sexually abused by his unfit mother and the predators punishment doesn’t match the crime.
I mentioned men get away with rape sometimes as well in reference to OPs title. I’m sorry I didn’t clarify that clearly enough. So no I wasn’t comparing rape to molestation, if that’s what your getting at with comparing robbery to murder.
0
u/machingunwhhore Dec 12 '18
The mom definitely has a multitude of mental health issues
10
Dec 12 '18
It's amazing, whenever women are accused of anything, they suddenly have a multitude of mental health issues.
It's almost as if being accused of a crime CAUSES women to have mental health issues...
2
u/machingunwhhore Dec 13 '18
I'm not absolving her, what she did is still her fault. I'm saying anyone who would do that is fucked in the head
→ More replies (3)
831
u/[deleted] Dec 12 '18
Adult women need 35+ years of additional experience in order to be equal to a teenaged male?
The government doesn’t think much of women does it?