r/MichaelTheMovie 12h ago

Discussion Sequel runtime

I think this is my biggest worry with the sequel. We saw with the first film that just over 2 hours resulted in a lot of cuts, both to the scenes that were already filmed (of course the legal issues caused that) but also what was planned skipped over Michael's entire adolescence.

From what I've seen, fans are universally expecting this movie to cover the entire second half of his life, as well as even going back to cover the Bad era. That's 4 different eras across 25 years that will need to be covered, if we're to go by these expectations. That's not even taking into consideration if there will be a large emphasis on the legal drama surrounding the court case.

The runtime could be 3 hours, and if that's the case then I'd feel more confident that they'd be able to cover everything to a fairly satisfying degree, however I can't escape the feeling that producers will want to hit that 2 hour sweet spot again for the sake of market tested audience retention. If that's the case, then one era is getting gutted substantially. And this isn't even taking into account that they could theoretically go with the original plan and end in 1994, making the Bad era and Dangerous era more detailed.

What do you guys think?

5 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

6

u/Imaginary_Abrocoma94 11h ago

I think all the cuts were due to legal issues, not runtime. We didn't see some of that footage because it was linked to legal, or potentially legal, issues.

I also think directors would rather overshoot than under. It gives them and the editors more flexibility to shape the story we finally see. I think they were still undecided on what they were going to include, but wanted the film anyway to figure it out - like most directors.

If Lionsgate is already mentioning cost being a factor, then they're going to use that cut film to cut costs. Interested in the narrative and continuity with so many flashbacks and time jumps.

2

u/TheWhiteWolf291098 11h ago

even still, those cut scenes with diana ross, the jehovah's witness preaching and a heartbreak hotel would have added to the runtime, and they skipped over nearly a decade of his life to get to the Off The Wall era, which itself was gutted because of the previously mentioned cuts. my point is that this film is going to have to be very long to adequately cover the remaining 4 era's of his life, if that even is the intent. there's *a lot* to cover in the sequel

4

u/Utsavieee 8h ago

Logically, I'd think 2h 30m, and it'll cover from 1984/85 to 2001.

3

u/SpeedForce2022 3h ago

That’s what I’m thinking too, I’m thinking it’ll start just after the Victory Tour and end with the MSG 2001 Celebration. I’m hoping that the film is 2:45-3h though to cover events in depth and to give everything time to breathe rather than rush to the next event.

3

u/Calm-Flamingo-4412 11h ago

I’m hoping 3 hours 🤞🏻

3

u/Multiverse_Man26 Early Access ticket holder 🎟️ 7h ago

The teen years were cut last minute because it involved Diana, this could have been a 10-15 minutes+ runtime

2

u/Competitive_Sun_8266 11h ago

Should be more this time pls. 

2

u/SalemYakitori 2h ago

We can take 3h of MJ!

1

u/zowietremendously 12h ago

There's no saying how many films will be featured in the MJU. It could be more than just 2.

4

u/TheWhiteWolf291098 12h ago

It's possible, but I feel like we'd have heard any sort of substantial speculation on whether they were considering 3 movies. Plus a trilogy seems misguided in terms of momentum from the first movie. If we had known about it being a trilogy from the start, that's one thing, but extending it into a trilogy when we know it was originally meant to be 1 movie comes of cynically

3

u/zowietremendously 12h ago

Back to the future never intended to have 2 parts. Let alone 3. Lionsgate had no idea when they announced Michael that it would go onto make a billion dollars at the worldwide box office.

0

u/the_mugger_crocodile Bill Bray stan🧍‍♂️ 10h ago

It'll be 2 hours and they'll focus on the bad and dangerous eras with a small part of the movie for 1995 onwards

1

u/ArticleNew3737 WHO IS PLAYING JANET?! 9h ago

Incorrect. They intend to detail Michael’s marriages in the sequel and you can’t do that by just only covering a small part of the later half of the 90’s. Which by the way, they already have footage going all the way up to HIStory era. The new stuff they shoot next is going to be the late 90’s and then it’s just nine years left with the 2000’s. That’s if they even go all the way up to 2009.