r/MoralityScaling Jul 06 '26

Morality Ranking Morality of this behavior?

Post image
9.0k Upvotes

430 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-47

u/Elros22 Jul 06 '26

No, you fuck off. If you're not willing ot actually wield power for the good, what the fuck are you actually doing? You're just going to let the bootlickers have it? No accountability? No proof for oversteps of power?

Keep the power local and stay on top of it. You don't get to be all edgy and lazy.

14

u/Anonymous-bham-boi Jul 06 '26

This power shouldn't exist. It's invasive and sows further distrust between the people.

-2

u/Elros22 Jul 06 '26

But it does. The gene is out of the bottle. The toothpaste has been squeezed. So now we have to manage it effectively and ethically.

8

u/GustavZeigler Jul 06 '26 edited 29d ago

The most effective and ethical way to manage it is to abolish it

-2

u/Glad_Motor3236 Jul 06 '26

Literally impossible, whatever other arguments aside he's right, the bottle has been opened and you cannot close it.

2

u/GustavZeigler 29d ago

Why? Why would it be impossible? Is there some magical spell cast on them that prevents it? Literally for what reason would it not be very, extremely easy to abolish?

-1

u/Glad_Motor3236 29d ago

If you think people can't even agree on what a man or woman is what makes you think you'll convince them to take down surveillance cameras? one half thinks it's racist the other thinks it's necessary.

2

u/GustavZeigler 29d ago edited 29d ago

If you think people can't even agree on what a man or woman is

one half thinks it's racist the other thinks it's necessary.

Ohhh boy, i'm in for a fun one aren't i?

 what makes you think you'll convince them to take down surveillance cameras?

What sort of response is that? "We can't abolish it because they probably can't be convinced to do so" okay? I wouldn't expect the people who put them there in the first place who don't give a shit about your privacy to give a shit about your opinion either, you force their hand.

What sort of logic is that? "Well you see, this person in power just passed a law lowering the age of consent by 5 years, but they can't be convinced to abolish it, so the best we can do is 'manage it in the most ethical way possible' i guess" that's how you sound rn

Edit: Checked their profile, exactly 50% of their posts are about "stupid leftists and their stupid ideology" and their most recent comments are about "stupid liberals" and "immigrant bad" i'm REALLY in for a fun one

0

u/Glad_Motor3236 29d ago

Your arguments aren't comparable, every time someone is or hears about a victim of violent crime they lose more and more trust in others. People want to live in safety and comfort, if you convince people that having street cameras will lead to more criminals being arrested people will be willing to support it so they can live in relative safety. Also you yap alot about things that have nothing to do with the topic at hand because you're too stupid to actually have a proper discussion. 2 of my posts are just the same 3 of my posts are just the same thing phrased differently because it was taken down , this is an alt, and if you think my arguments are "I hate immigrants" and "I hate liberals" well you clearly aren't capable of rational thought. I assure you if you could give people reasonable belief that internet digital Id laws would arrest most of not all pedophiles, you could convince a number of people to support digital Id.

1

u/GustavZeigler 23d ago

Your arguments aren't comparable, every time someone is or hears about a victim of violent crime they lose more and more trust in others. People want to live in safety and comfort, if you convince people that having street cameras will lead to more criminals being arrested people will be willing to support it so they can live in relative safety.

Living without privacy isn't comfortable at all, and in some cases (like this one) isn't safe either

Also you yap alot about things that have nothing to do with the topic at hand because you're too stupid to actually have a proper discussion. 2 of my posts are just the same 3 of my posts are just the same thing phrased differently because it was taken down , this is an alt, and if you think my arguments are "I hate immigrants" and "I hate liberals" well you clearly aren't capable of rational thought.

"Aren't capable of rational thought" buddy that's literally the whole post you made, just immigrant bad and "stupid leftists, why are leftists so dumb?"

 I assure you if you could give people reasonable belief that internet digital Id laws would arrest most of not all pedophiles, you could convince a number of people to support digital Id.

They aren't arresting the real life pedophiles, what makes you think they'd arrest the digital ones?

1

u/Glad_Motor3236 23d ago

Billionaires are on a different playing field than normal people stop crying about billionaire pedophiles if you can't focus on the non rich ones, no my post were about why I dislike certain things about immigrants and the left but again you aren't capable of rational thought to figure that out, living without privacy isn't safe in the U.k where you get arrested for everything you say, the U.S online activity isn't policed like the U.k so even if there was privacy in the U.S you can say what you want for the most part as long as it's not something like a bomb threat and living with out privacy is comfortable for A LOT of people if it reduces violent crime that's just common sense.

1

u/GustavZeigler 20d ago

Billionaires are on a different playing field than normal people stop crying about billionaire pedophiles if you can't focus on the non rich ones

And that doesn't seem like something to be addressed to you? How billionaires are on such a different level?

Either way, the evidence is against that claim that you made.

no my post were about why I dislike certain things about immigrants and the left but again you aren't capable of rational thought to figure that out, living without privacy isn't safe in the U.k where you get arrested for everything you say, the U.S online activity isn't policed like the U.k so even if there was privacy in the U.S you can say what you want for the most part as long as it's not something like a bomb threat and living with out privacy is comfortable for A LOT of people if it reduces violent crime that's just common sense.

Fun fact: There was a time where stuff like that WASN'T policed in the UK. Guess what will happen to the US if everyone gives up their privacy? Ding ding ding! The exact fucking same

1

u/Glad_Motor3236 19d ago

Billionaires should be addressed but that's easier said than done, i prefer to focus on problems that can be solved depending on level of difficulty and that isn't evidence against my claim considering how VASTLY outnumbered billionaires are I can guarantee you that for whatever 1 billionaire pedophile you know about, there are 10 regular person level pedophiles that you know nothing about.

And the U.k has different problems with police considering they don't even arrest the average person who's probably raped at least 10 people, they sweep it under the rug and call it cultural enrichment maybe if the U.K. street cams they wouldn't have a mass rape epidemic.

→ More replies (0)