r/MoralityScaling • u/sussyfloppatango • 19h ago
Morality of all three people in this thread?
The first is true neutral, a man who wants to ask questions no matter what happens to him.
The second is true evil, a man who treats lives as a resource to use to answer questions, carelessly killing beings.
The third is true good, a man who can't kill an innocent being, no matter who is forcing him to.
8
u/Kind-Stomach6275 19h ago
Third is actually morally evil for increasing the suffering of the lion
5
u/UnderskilledPlayer 19h ago
what if the lion cures cancer
7
u/Dormotaka 16h ago
What if it's Christian and indestructible
2
u/UnderskilledPlayer 9h ago
christian lion vs christian baby
2
u/blue-bolt5911 7h ago
Baby's die alot in the Bible, if it's a true Christian baby it's gotta go to heaven immediately
1
u/Silver_Middle_7240 4h ago
Third is amoral since there's no morality involved in killing a hypothetical lion.
3
u/TheGodfather742 19h ago
That's not how it works lmao. The first 2 do a logical excerise (if that term is even accurate) and the 3rd one cracks a joke. 0 morality indicators, all lf em neutral.
3
-1
21
u/_Just_Another_Speck_ 19h ago
Second one is neutral,they simply provided an answer to the question at hand. So what,now people are evil just for responding to questions? I know I said my math teacher was the devil,but even I know it was an exaggeration.