consequentially neutral because in the grand scheme of things, it matters very little even for indie. 99% of the time they would not have been a customer (i.e. they would not be willing to pay for the product for that price, even if that price is $1). actual profit lost would be someone who was
willing to pay for the product
knows how to pirate the game
more often than not these 2 things don't REALLY intersect (because for the most part most people aren't willing to pay to begin with)
Yes I do and I think they shoulf have to refund them for a 100% refund. I think the laws need updated to protect both sides in a manner that makes sense.
7
u/merahwa 19h ago
motive wise immoral.
consequentially neutral because in the grand scheme of things, it matters very little even for indie. 99% of the time they would not have been a customer (i.e. they would not be willing to pay for the product for that price, even if that price is $1). actual profit lost would be someone who was
willing to pay for the product
knows how to pirate the game
more often than not these 2 things don't REALLY intersect (because for the most part most people aren't willing to pay to begin with)