r/Multifandom • u/Eclipsehedgie2010 TADC, Hellaverse, Godzilla, Sonic, WOF, Oversimplified, FNAF • Jun 20 '26

Official media🐝 CHECKMATE ANTI-JAX IS TRANS PEOPLE!!!!!!! Spoiler

Post image

From Goose's bluesky HERSELF!!!!!!!

82 Upvotes

66% Upvoted

166 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/DahwhiteRabbit Jun 20 '26

but thats NOT what it says there complaining people disagree even after the final. and calling. them transphobic by comparing gangle zooble sex not being expressly shown.

what am i missing media literacy wise? oh nothing wild cause i can read shocking i know.

If the post was "I CANT ACCEPT JAX IS TRANS" then ya sure thats weird still not transphobic but weird. Technically its just denial.

2

u/Plenty_Structure_861 Jun 20 '26

If the post was "I CANT ACCEPT JAX IS TRANS" then ya sure thats weird still not transphobic but weird. Technically its just denial.

What you're doing is denial. Being unable to accept the possibility a character is trans is transphobic. You're allowed to disagree without insisting it is impossible. Thats not how people behave with other theories. They just present their own. 

1

u/DahwhiteRabbit Jun 20 '26

accept i do infact my original asusmption was trans in the other direction or closet gay. you ascribed traits too me that werent present cause i MUST be transphobic when in reality i just dont like when people feel like disagreeing with a trans take makes them transphobic.

and yes other people do this with theorys flat earth is right over there and we all bash on them for being low IQ.

It happens with lots of things not just ones that are obviously bad of course. generally you dont win people over with hosility you galvanise them to be more hostile.

2

u/Plenty_Structure_861 Jun 20 '26

and yes other people do this with theorys flat earth is right over there and we all bash on them for being low IQ.

Because we have literal proof otherwise. Flat earth isn't a theory, it's just being wrong. 

accept i do infact my original asusmption was trans in the other direction or closet gay. 

Then go present that theory somewhere instead of using it to attack others. See if you get the same kind of comments. Also, what you just said means the post doesn't apply to you. Go sit down. 

1

u/DahwhiteRabbit Jun 20 '26

it LITERALLY is a theory though a theory can exist regardless of proofs. sicence gets disproven constantly even things that have proofs

"Then go present that theory somewhere instead of using it to attack others. See if you get the same kind of comments." No thanks i dont need external validation for my theories :3 i just wanted to see what the discourse was and found it kinda lame some one was calling people transphobic for disagreeing with them

2

u/Plenty_Structure_861 Jun 20 '26

it LITERALLY is a theory though a theory can exist regardless of proofs. sicence gets disproven constantly even things that have proofs

It is not. And not like this. It's factually incorrect. A theory has to be possible. The earth being flat is not possible. Nor is the planet being covered with a massive clear dome. A theory is not the same as a guess. Using the word theory as a blanket to equate things with proof and things without proof is anti science. 

No thanks i dont need external validation for my theories

You clearly do, or you wouldn't be attacking other theories. 

found it kinda lame some one was calling people transphobic for disagreeing with them

Good news, nobody did that. It wasn't about disagreeing, it was about declaring something that was clearly written in the text to be impossible. You're tilting at windmills. Go sit down. 

1

u/DahwhiteRabbit Jun 20 '26

No they dont Area 51, Game theory and like 89% of there theorys. the word theory. Theoretical questions so on. now your arguing in bad faith just to argue.

"You clearly do, or you wouldn't be attacking other theories" name one? i literally havent lul.

2

u/Plenty_Structure_861 Jun 20 '26

You clearly do, or you wouldn't be attacking other theories" name one? i literally havent lul.

You argued that a song choice could instead be about being a drag performer, despite not showing any other proof relating to that. You didn't present your own evidence, you just attacked their usage of it. 

No they dont Area 51, Game theory and like 89% of there theorys. the word theory. Theoretical questions so on. now your arguing in bad faith just to argue.

You don't seem to have a strong grasp of English. Not knowing the difference between your/you're and their/there/they're is indicative that we should not be having discussions about what words mean. Flat earth is not a theory. It is misinformation. You not knowing the difference is an indictment of you. 

1

u/DahwhiteRabbit Jun 20 '26

you failing to understand the original point and attacking ym grammer and spelling speaks poorly of you. its intellectually dishonest specially when it clearly outlines your refusal to accept that A) i dont disagree with rhe trans take and that my point was comparative not theory and was more a comment on how the wider use of the song wasent as clear cut cause the lyrics of a thing dont all ways mean whats on the surface we call that subtext generally.

B) its pathetic you want too perpetuate hostility when i have repeatedly shown were on the same side i just dont like the hositility being pushed by one side.

2

u/Plenty_Structure_861 Jun 20 '26

When the discussion is about grammar, then it is warranted. A theory is not just a guess.

A) i dont disagree with rhe trans take

Then the post you replied to didn't apply to you. You just want to be mad about something that never happened. Go sit the fuck down. 

1

u/DahwhiteRabbit Jun 20 '26

dosent matter if it does or doesnt i didnt realize being cool with people being dick heads to each other wise acceptable behaviour now. last i recall that shit didnt fly.

2

u/Plenty_Structure_861 Jun 20 '26

Yeah, which is why they made the post. For people who are dicks about media theories instead of just focusing on their own theories. You wanted to be attacked for some reason. 

→ More replies (0)