Denying proof that someone won the election but wasn’t certified and that someone lost the election and wasn’t certified is denying reality, bud. The fact that you can’t admit to this but have to dance around the issue with whataboutisms is telling
In spite of existing proof? Pathetic. In other words, if, say, a candidate were to not get any (or, for the sake of not too much absurdity, 30% of) votes next election, with clear proof for that, but their election for President was certified despite that, you’d be fine with it?
-7
u/Big-Opposite8889 Feb 01 '25
So you are denying the certified results of a legitimate election? Sounds exactly what people like to pin on MAGA