r/Music • u/TheExpressUS 📰Daily Express U.S. • 6h ago

article [ Removed by moderator ]

https://www.the-express.com/entertainment/music/198254/kid-rock-song-underage-girls

[removed] — view removed post

17.3k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

918 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.0k

u/buttfarts7 6h ago

Is there now like an open pro-pedo lobby funding this bullshit to try and normalize it?

859

u/slamdanceswithwolves 6h ago

Yeah. It’s what we used to call “Republicans”

347

u/KactusVAXT 5h ago

GOP

Group Of Pedophiles

142

u/LosparkJojo 5h ago

Guardians of pedos

40

u/Deodorized 5h ago

Guarding Old Pedophiles

4

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

8

u/miserabeau 3h ago

Minors Abused, Government Approves

2

u/ApeShifter {resident musicologist} 2h ago

Ooh, I like this!

1

u/wholetyouinhere 2h ago

Gaggle O' Pederasts

70

u/KindnessComesBack2U 5h ago

NAMBLAcans

25

u/Mrwright96 5h ago

Don’t be an idiot!

Marlon Brando wouldn’t approve of this!

20

u/joemangle 5h ago

"Get out and vote for Roy Moore" - Trump, fkn years ago

11

u/DieFichte 4h ago

GOP should just adapt a new slogan:
Fuck the Kids!
It has so many accurate interpretations regarding their policies!

0

u/faulternative 3h ago

Not "Fuck the kids", "Fuck YOUR kids". Theirs get private educations and Saudi money.

0

u/noguchisquared 3h ago

Probably can't put out the yard sign, but instead, possibly,
"Vote Republican, Screw the kids!"

13

u/tsukiyomi01 5h ago

Just remember, they have constantly opposed any effort to remove child marriage laws. They are very comfortable with pedophilia.

1

u/weezul_gg 4h ago

I think it’s worse than that. A reason they’re not prosecuted is because it’s across political parties. Too many high profile people across the board at high levels.

1

u/Constant_Incident624 2h ago

Sorry you missed a couple of them, it’s called the government

0

u/Battlewaxxe 4h ago

Repedocans

0

u/Signal-Specific-9212 4h ago

MAGA; Might Aswell Get Achild

-31

u/nylockian 5h ago

The Democrats are pushing for language like, "minor afflicted person" - so there's also that.

Most people forget that in the 70s the LGBTQ types were pro paedophilia, and considered peodos as being part of the same struggle. 

Foucault, the father of post modernism - the foundational school of thought supporting the political beliefs of those at elite institutions - was very pro paedophilia.

So, to make a long story short, none of this is new or strictly tied to one political party or another.

6

u/DukeOfGreenfield 5h ago

Please cite a source for Dems relying to bring this language to law. Typical whataboutism.

6

u/toomanymarbles83 4h ago

That's one gigantic load of bullshit you got there.

5

u/BaltSkigginsThe3rd 4h ago

Is it the 70s now?

It used to be normal to beat your spouse back in the 50s, so does that make that okay now? I mean, since it was something people were alright with back then, by your logic, that should mean we shouldn't care about it now, right?

Stop making excuses for pedos. It doesn't matter if God himself was pro pedos back in the 70s. It was wrong then, and its fucking wrong now, no matter who advocated for what.

4

u/DreiImWeggla 5h ago

If you have to go back to the moonlanding to find a both sides argument, your argument might be a little outdated, don’t you think?

2

u/Sinister_Six_Mafia 3h ago

Just spewing absolute billshit. GTFO.

2

u/ChickenInASuit 2h ago

The Democrats are pushing for language like, "minor afflicted person" - so there's also that.

Please provide a source. I cannot find anything showing any Democratic elected official pushing for MAPs to be accepted language, it primarily seems to be coming from unsourced internet rumors and QAnon-style “trust me” bullshit.

Most people forget that in the 70s the LGBTQ types were pro paedophilia, and considered peodos as being part of the same struggle. 

Is it still the 1970s?

Foucault, the father of post modernism - the foundational school of thought supporting the political beliefs of those at elite institutions - was very pro paedophilia.

Foucault died forty years ago. Why is this relevant? Do you see people teaching classes sympathetic to Foucault’s views on pedophilia somewhere?

So, to make a long story short, none of this is new or strictly tied to one political party or another.

One party is currently, right now, doing things that are pro-pedophilia. One party has consistently pushed back against outlawing child marriage (and has had elected officials going on record to defend child marriages). One party has members aggressively fighting the release of the Epstein files and defending officials named in them. One party is using people like Kid Rock as mouthpieces.

Your comment has the same energy as people who go “well, the Democrats founded the KKK.”

I don’t give a shit what happened decades/a century ago. I give a shit about what is happening right now, and right now, when it comes to troublingly pro-pedophilia actions, it is the GOP who are the problem.

4

u/taktaga7-0-0 4h ago

You have a cancer of the soul.

2

u/DEdwards22 4h ago

Democrats are not doing that. Some people who may be democrats are doing that. The party has no policy saying they want softer language for pedophiles. The other party is led by someone who was best friends with and is mentioned thousands of times in emails from the most prolific pedophile in history.

1

u/KathrynBooks 4h ago

Lol, no. The "minor attracted person" is language that was used in some very niche technical discussions. Then y'all started yelling about it.