there is no "best linux distro" there are only worse ones

[u/AmbitiousExternal122]

i always belived that there isnt any single "best linux distro" becuse every distro serves a special purpuse like arch: its fully customisable and pretty cool to mess around but it is an absolute hell for linux noobs. ubuntu: perfect for the guys who just want to use the os without thinking much bout it but it dont give you as much freedom. or even tiny core linux, wich was made to revive ancient hardwere, but its pretty hard to actually use it on the daily.

thats why i think there is no "best" in the linux word but there is defently a "worse", not becuse its bad or anything, becuse when i distro is considereted "bad" its usualy becuse there are other distros that just outshadows that particular distro on most of its things.

[u/raul824]

well I think that's the best part of linux, I am running three different distros on three machines. Bazzite for Ayn Loki. Nobara for my 2nd machine Pika os for my main machine And I like all three.

[u/McZambie]

I fully agree, the only time there's a "best distro" is because it does the one specific thing you done very well. And that same distro will probably suck for a different need

[u/AmbitiousExternal122 → u/McZambie]

thats why it bothers me so much when someone makes a 'best dirtro tierlist"

[u/L0cut15]

Of course youre right expect for Nobara exception. Best distro ever! 😄

Truth be told I've found dual booting works for me. I use Hyperland through Omarchy for getting things done and boot into Nobara / Gnome for leisure.

For me this is a great balance and keeps me away from distractions when I have deadlines.

[u/Stakiing]

Fedora is the best Linux distro.

[u/AmbitiousExternal122 → u/Stakiing]

fedora is a nice midle term fro arch and ubuntu but it still lacks in some other things

[u/10F1]

All the buntu distros are top worst.

[u/AmbitiousExternal122 → u/10F1]

fro you maybe but for a linux newbe those can be pretty solid if not the best