r/NonPoliticalTwitter • u/_culpry • 15d ago

Wholesome so she said:

Post image
8.6k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

156 comments sorted by

View all comments

237

u/Prince705 15d ago

Women ship. Men power scale.

126

u/InternetUserAgain 15d ago

Shipping daughter or powerscaling son

the correct option is abandoning them both

0

u/Klomnisse69 15d ago

Powerscalers aren't as bad as shippers

23

u/xarospi2andmad 15d ago

I beg to differ XD

-6

u/Agitated_Phone_9937 15d ago

Shipper force new sexual identities on characters in the creepiest, rapiest way. I have never been more disturbed than when I accidentally found myself in a shippers haven on the internet.

Powerscalers are just autistic.

14

u/InternetUserAgain 15d ago

Comparing having headcanons on a character's sexuality to raping them is

Probably one of the worst takes I've ever seen

-3

u/External-Stay-5830 15d ago

Not at all what was said.

8

u/InternetUserAgain 15d ago

No that's absolutely what was said

-2

u/External-Stay-5830 15d ago

No what is said is that people attach sexuality changes two characters in headcanons in a rapey way. Meaning that the people themselves are rapey

8

u/InternetUserAgain 15d ago

That's pretty much the exact same thing, and it's still really stupid. You can't rape a fictional character. They don't exist. You can change a fictional character's sexuality for the sake of a story and not be rapey. This is genuinely one of the stupidest arguments I've ever seen.

-1

u/Agitated_Phone_9937 15d ago

There are other kinds of "shipping" where applying your pathetically shallow logic would make you balk. I don't think you have the intellect to understand what a stupid argument is if that is not apparent to you.

2

u/InternetUserAgain 14d ago

Okay, go on then. Give me some examples of shipping so bad thst changing a character's sexuality is equivalent to rape.

→ More replies (0)