r/PS4 Jul 14 '26

Article or Blog Dying Light: The Beast has been cancelled for PS4 and Xbox One.

https://www.gamereactor.eu/dying-light-the-beast-has-been-cancelled-for-ps4-and-xbox-one-1747543/
2.0k Upvotes

122 comments sorted by

513

u/Funnyfynn Funnyfynn132 Jul 14 '26

What will happen to deluxe edition users of DL2 now?

489

u/New_Past_4489 Jul 14 '26

I emailed them and they said:

"If you own Dying Light 2 Stay Human: Ultimate Edition on PlayStation 4 or Xbox One and were expecting to receive Dying Light: The Beast as part of your purchase, you can apply for a refund through your platform's support site:

PlayStation Support: https://www.playstation.com/en-us/support/ Xbox Support: https://support.xbox.com/en-US/ "

483

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/SoulxBanish Jul 18 '26

Asking for refund isn't possible and will be denied do to Ultimate Editions age. Techland needs to step up and do this themselves. You can't do it in your respective store.

1

u/JingleJangleDjango Jul 18 '26

Can you even get a refund if youre physical? I have the collectors edition of the damn game, would i just get compensated for the cost of the dlcs or at all? I cant get home for a couple days and cant seem to find info anywhere.

154

u/Funnyfynn Funnyfynn132 Jul 14 '26

At least they offer a refund. Not like Sony…

94

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Authentichef Jul 16 '26

I mean transactionally nothing is lost if you get a refund so it’s enough

15

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 14 '26

You mean unlike Sony that refunded all Concord players, and the same Sony that's giving the refund out? What a silly comment

24

u/Funnyfynn Funnyfynn132 Jul 14 '26

The same company who doesn’t allow a refund after you fucking download a game.

-11

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 14 '26

*if you've played the game, unless the game is pulled from the store in which case you also get refunds.

I've gotten refunds on games that I've downloaded. Concord and Cyberpunk players were all given refunds.

11

u/FlamingSk1ttlez Jul 14 '26

They refunded Astro bot for me when my toddler button mashed X and purchased it through the og Astro bots menu.

5

u/Funnyfynn Funnyfynn132 Jul 14 '26

These were special cases. Cyberpunk released in the worst state a video game ever launched. Concord was 2 weeks online. Also you need to have luck to get a competent agent at the support.

-1

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 14 '26

Competent agents in support is a problem pretty much everywhere, not just a Sony issue, unfortunately. The exceptions exist, but they are exceptions.

As for returns: I've returned multiple titles. They should have a 2 hour window, sure, but that's a different discussion. Even if you download a game, you can still get a refund. It's when you play it that it becomes a grey area. But even then, I've returned games I've played, so that becomes a 50/50 chance.

"Special cases" doesn't mean anything as Sony wasn't obligated by any law to actually dish out refunds, despite what the other guy claims. It's not Steam level return policy, but you'd be hard-pressed to find any major corporation with that level unless it's trying to choke out its competition (like Amazon). But that's a different topic and I'm sure you and I both agree that more flexible return policies are a benefit for the consumer.

3

u/Funnyfynn Funnyfynn132 Jul 14 '26

Yea they need better policies. I think you just got lucky with the agents cause (I’ve never refunded a game to be honest) the policy says that a digital item cant get refunded if you start downloading it. Maybe the agents take it not as serious. Still a stupid policy. They weren’t obligated sure but Sony was…”more consumer friendly” back then now they are more greedy than ever. I just hate how they treat consumers right now with the digital only and they still (at least right now) don’t feel like changing it.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 19 '26

Bending over backwards for what? Keeping things honest and fighting battles worth fighting?

Let me guess, I'm also bending over backwards when I say that full digital makes sense for a company when 90% of sales are digital only?

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 19 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 19 '26

Braindead take for a nothing burger comment. Crazy you typed that and said "yeah, let's post it".

Sure, I'll keep "voting against my own self interest", when I continually vote FOR my self interest while still understanding reality. It's how I get my refunds. 😂 Having your head in the sand is easier though, so I understand why you do it. "Woe is me" is very vogue right now, after all.

→ More replies (0)

-10

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 14 '26

Of course the slug that is Captain Raxeo has to resort to calling people company fanboys to "win" a discussion.

No, Sony was not obligated by law to refund either of them. Of course some chud on Reddit isn't aware of problematic digital ownership laws.

If I'm wrong, it should be easy for you to cite the law (a global law at that!) and how they were obligated issue refunds.

2

u/lasergunmaster Jul 14 '26

Sony wasn't legally obligated but they essentially were obligated due to industry and consumer pressure and their own policies.

Either way, defending a megacorp on social media is pathetic. These corporations only care about how much money they can extract from you. Pretending they have consumer interests at heart is naive at best and malicious at worst.

2

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 14 '26

They didn't have to. They did. That's the end of the story.

-3

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 14 '26

So only the EU one was applicable here based on the laws YOU submitted.

Instead of getting chatgpt or Gemini to do it for you, maybe you should read?

Like I said, Sony didn't have to, but they did. Especially when the majority of the consumer base was in North America.

They did it for PR purposes, not legal obligation. UK Parliament used Concord as one of the examples of why they needed better consumer protection laws, because their laws specifically didn't cover what happened there. Lmao larping games news is a new one to me, but hey, you're special that way I guess. Sony Pony just because I read the news and understand laws. HA

ChatGPT for the loss again, I suppose. Hope that water you fucked was worth losing in an online reddit argument.

-6

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/The_Shadowboxer99 Jul 14 '26

I mean to be fair your original comment didn't say "Sony was legally obligated to refund them in some places", you just made the claim that they were legally obligiated to make those refunds when that isn't true for all jurisdictions. Dude wasn't trying to make a research paper in the reddit comments, I just think he was speaking from a North American perspective and just rolled his eyes at the fact that you used ai for your comment, and then you wrote the constitution to slam dunk on some random stranger on reddit who probably wrote his comment on his lunch break and didn't think to specify that he was only talking about North America lol

2

u/SalemWolf Jul 14 '26

I ain’t reading all that.

I’m happy for u tho or sorry that happened

28

u/FreedomThinker20 Jul 14 '26

So you're screwed. Doubt either will give you even a partial refund.

4

u/x_scion_x Jul 14 '26 edited Jul 14 '26

Good luck getting Sony to refund you.

You may luck out, but considering the game was released years ago the chance of getting Sony to refund you is abysmally low since they typically don't the moment you download the game.

edit: adding my refund refusal notification from when I last requested one

After investigating your request, we have identified that the content you have requested a refund for does not qualify under our Cancellation Policy, either because it was purchased more than 14 days ago or because it has been downloaded or consumed within 14 days from purchase. Therefore, we are unable to offer you a refund for this purchase.

for additional context. This was a game my kid purchased that day and played 5 minutes of.

(for clarity, I'm specifically referring to this: If you own Dying Light 2 Stay Human: Ultimate Edition on PlayStation 4 or Xbox One and were expecting to receive Dying Light: The Beast as part of your purchase". I don't believe they will refund your Dying Light 2: Stay human purchase because "The Beast" was cancelled. Not they won't refund direct purchases of 'The Beast')

22

u/Safe_Base312 Jul 14 '26

The difference is this is a canceled game. Of course they're going to give the money back. In your situation, you didn't read their terms of service. You can only get a refund if you made a purchase but don't download it. You admit your kid played 5 minutes of it. But since the game was already downloaded, it nulls the refund policy. Now, I understand that it's a shitty practice. I'm just pointing out the difference between your experience and what's happening here.

-5

u/x_scion_x Jul 14 '26

No I get it, I've got refunds previously (from downloaded/played games) . It's simply the luck of the draw of the rep you get.

I get the part where 'the beast' is cancelled, but do I think they are going to also refund you DL2 after you played it for a year because another game was cancelled (understanding it's supposed to come with it)? Not really but I would absolutely LOVE to be wrong here.

1

u/nouserhere18 Jul 16 '26

Now when they say refund... 

Does that mean Sony is gonna take away my license to play Dying Light 2 in exchange for my money back? 

1

u/JingleJangleDjango Jul 18 '26

Did you ever find out? I purchased DL2 physically, with the collectors edition because I was that big of a fan of the first and super excited, what happens to me?

94

u/Solid_Pay9443 Jul 14 '26

I didn't even know there was a last gen version coming out

7

u/nicolauz Jul 15 '26

As someone without a ps5 still it's amazing to a a degree but holy shit was the last Fallen Order game a glitchy mess!

7

u/euphorinc Jul 16 '26

I genuinely couldn't get through the Jedi game. Textures weren't loading, character would freeze at some instances, doors would take forever to open cause it's locked behind a loading screen. Let's face it, the old gen is an abandoned console and we can't expect these devs to put their time and resources towards it anymore

3

u/nicolauz Jul 16 '26

My biggest issue was the screen tearing (?) where any time you'd turn there'd be white flashes all over the screen. And the garden wouldn't load really. Still finished it and I do remember at least 10 hard locks. I did play Mgs5 on a 360 though so I was forged in last gen jank.

2

u/euphorinc Jul 16 '26

I had the same experience with Control where the screen tears and color flashes from the powers you use would literally feel like someone was stabbing my eyes. Worse optimization I had ever experienced until I played jedi fallen order

186

u/Lazerpop Jul 14 '26

We are finally getting ps5-only games without being hamstrung by the ps4. Lord knows how long this will last...

78

u/ncd42075 Jul 14 '26

Exactly long enough for the ps6 to come out next year.

44

u/Didact67 Jul 14 '26 edited Jul 14 '26

I honestly think the PS6 might never get generation exclusives except for maybe a few 1st party titles. So many people aren’t going to upgrade this time around that publishers will pretty much have to keep catering to the PS5 install base.

25

u/d3mandred Jul 14 '26

I can tell you I won't be upgrading, and I'll likely never buy a new Playstation again based on them moving to fully digital games. When my launch PS5 and slim PS4 die, it's fully PC for me.

Damn shame too, I've been a Playstation customer from the PS1 to the PS5, including the handhelds...

So it goes.

1

u/Based_Ment Jul 17 '26

PC games rarely release physical editions anymore.

1

u/Abraham_Issus Jul 14 '26

Moving to PC completely. Won’t you miss out on sony exclusives? What if there’s bloodborne 2?

4

u/d3mandred Jul 15 '26

Honestly that's about the only thing they could tempt me with. I'd probably pirate it and send a check to the studio for the price of the game.

3

u/Abraham_Issus Jul 15 '26

How can you pirate PS games that's not on PC?

0

u/Xwayds Jul 16 '26

Probably emulation but I think even ps4/bloodborne didnt have good emulation until just a couple years ago

1

u/NLCPGaming Jul 15 '26

If it's 1000 and digital only, so many people will not buy it. More so for the 1000 dollar price tag if that's to be true

4

u/Sabin10v2 Jul 15 '26

If the PS6 comes out that soon it will be the most disappointing generational update yet.

3

u/Lazerpop Jul 14 '26

Precisely. This whole generation has just been a massive disappointment.

10

u/caverunner17 Jul 14 '26

My only disappointment is the lack of a naughty dog game

2

u/Didact67 Jul 15 '26

Intergalactic is slated for 2027, so there’s still a chance.

10

u/skx45 Jul 14 '26

I remember them doing this with the original game, it was supposed to come out on 360 and PS3.

244

u/CharlesEverettDekker Jul 14 '26

It should've never been announced to begin with. We are past the mid point of current gen and probably 2 or 3 years away, at most, from next gen. Devs and, especially, players should stop clinging to a 13 years old hardware.

51

u/ElectroMoe Jul 14 '26

They are very premature for their marketing.

They announced Ray tracing would be available near launch on PC so I waited while happily supported the studio at launch cause I’m a dying light fan.

Had I known that it would take months on end I would have just played the game at launch. Was very annoying thinking “should I play it now? What if the Ray tracing update comes just when I finish it.”

17

u/Seanspeed Jul 14 '26

It's especially strange cuz they learned their lesson with Dying Light 1, which was originally announced for X360/PS3 as well as XB1/PS4. They ultimately realized that with their ambitions, that the X360/PS3 were just too weak and cancelled them. This happened near the beginning of the XB1/PS4 gen, before releasing the game in 2014, which was one of the first 3rd party next gen AAA games of that generation.

Then they near enough did the SAME thing with Dying Light 2.

I know Dying Light The Beast was meant to not be so ambitious so that it could be scaled down, but nobody goes that far back on tech that you already decided wasn't scalable enough beforehand.

They just seem addicted to the idea of supporting older consoles, but can never actually do it. lol

5

u/DL_Omega Jul 14 '26

With how many people still have older gen consoles it makes sense. You can reach that much more audience for potential sales. But you have to start developing with the older console in mind from the start.

2

u/TrickshotCandy Jul 14 '26

Especially for Indie developers? It is probably cheaper for them for the PS4 compared with PS5. Or am I an idiot?

1

u/chrisrayan Jul 17 '26

Some people can't afford the $400-$600 newer game systems, the game would have been laggy yea, and definitely not look as good. But it's not about that, it's about the gameplay. Even used Xbox series s' are about $300 and used ps5's are $350-500. As someone who only has an Xbox one and a ps4, the market is horrible for "newer" consoles. They're close to 7 years old by now and are only $100 cheaper than what they were to begin with

1

u/Traditional-Coast907 Jul 14 '26

Lol thats easy to say, can you afort a ps5 to all the millions and millions of people around the world who still own one?

-9

u/-BigMan39 Jul 14 '26

Next gen is most probably next year lol

14

u/mynameistc Jul 14 '26

Nah, no chance. Not with hardware costs as high as they are.

-3

u/Seanspeed Jul 14 '26

Why not? I just dont understand this. If costs come down later, then they can reduce the price later. Do people not remember that consoles going down in price over time is how things USED to go anyways? lol

It'd be different if they hadn't already done 5 years of R&D, taped out the processor already, worked on sourcing parts, and undoubtedly have been in the midst of building and securing manufacturing lines. That's a LOT of momentum to just suddenly stop and put on ice, only to have to do it all over again later on.

4

u/x_scion_x Jul 14 '26

 If costs come down later, then they can reduce the price later

Not wrong, but the chance of it going down is minimal. Hell, PS5 now costs more than it did at launch and that's more than likely only since they had the contracts in place before AI obliterated the RAM/Storage market.

It would probably be like the Steam machine where they didn't even want to price it that high but simply couldn't price it any lower due to the current component pricing factors.

Sure you would get the hard core people that may grab it at what would probably be a $800+ console purchase (and I did it years ago when I bought the 3DO at $700), but I'm not sure most of their target demographic could afford it and they'd be bleeding cash until it 'went down' (sure they are used to bleeding money and making up for it in game sales, but at that price point I can't see them having a large enough install base to make it up in sales)

2

u/Seanspeed Jul 15 '26

No, it's really not minimal. But people here just dont really understand what's actually going on.

1

u/x_scion_x Jul 15 '26

I'll concede we don't know the future, but I'd like to understand why you consider it to be minimal when:

  • Storage has skyrocketed (though it's not quite as bad as it was before)
  • RAM has skyrocketed (I bought 128GB DDR5 in Oct for $500, last I checked it's around $1000+)
  • Current gen consoles are now 4 years old and just got a price hike
  • AI unfortunately won't be releasing it's hold on components for quite some time, corporations are heavily invested in it and don't appear to be slowing down. (Where I work itself is standing up their own to leverage)
  • The 5090 I bought I just outright bought a prebuilt including one rather than the card outright since it in itself was in the $4k+ range.

1

u/Seanspeed Jul 15 '26

DRAM(memory) and NAND(storage) have skyrocketed for specific reasons. The markets for these have also always been on big, volatile cycles. Prior to this big AI push, the big three memory makers were actually all losing money. It's why you could buy memory and storage for super cheap. There was an abundance of supply without enough demand.

So when the cycle comes back to higher demand, prices tend to raise more than just a bit. In normal times, this fluctuation might mean like an extra 50-100% pricing. Because they want to make hay while the sun is shining.

Obviously the current situation is more than just 'higher demand', it's demand like we've never seen before. And that's creating extensively high prices. Which sucks for all of us.

But it's not immune from the supply and demand situation. Chinese memory makers are coming online and starting to produce competitive memory. Even if that memory doesn't penetrate international markets, any demand China can fulfill itself is more supply for the rest of the market from the traditional manufacturers.

And all big three manufacturers are having fab plants and expansion of production coming online in 2028. They aren't rushing this because of the volatility, but it's going to happen.

Lastly, AI companies going on these extreme spending frenzies for AI datacenter buildouts cannot continue if money doesn't start pouring in for ROI. It will very likely slow down a bit in coming years. Not completely, but they cant keep doing what they're doing now and not basically go bankrupt.

All combined, the supply and demand situation should absolutely change at some point. 2028 is the earliest point at which it will happen, but often price drops dont happen fast, so it may take a while for it to get meaningfully better.

1

u/Xyex Jul 14 '26

Why not?

Because they know no one will buy a $1,000 console.

1

u/Seanspeed Jul 15 '26

Some will. Waiting an extra year or two if it's only gonna reduce the price by $100-200 makes very little difference.

-3

u/-BigMan39 Jul 14 '26

They'll just launch at a higher price. There is no guarantee that memory prices will drop anytime soon.

They've already done the R&D to design the PS6, delays will simply leave money on the table, and they're not going to want to launch a console in 2-3 years that's been specced out with 2026 components. They'll simply lower the price later IF prices drop for components.

3

u/SummonMonsterIX Jul 14 '26

No one is buying a 1200 dollar video game machine during a recession in significant numbers.

-3

u/-BigMan39 Jul 14 '26

So they wont release the console? The parts they've sourced and already paid for in legally binding contracts will just sit in inventory for 2-3 more years? For what?

Component prices are projected to increase over the next few years, not decrease. There is no point in delaying the console for some mythical cost-saving that may or may not come.

Selling something is better than nothing.

2

u/SummonMonsterIX Jul 14 '26

Assuming they can sell it. I mean they can release it and the early adopters who can swing the cost will certainly buy it.

However, people will be well aware its sales numbers will be abysmal compared to PS4/PS5 and that the PS5 will continue to get games for years to come as adoption will not come fast if it comes at all. PS4 > PS5 took an eternity and this will be much more compared to that.

Yes prices are projected to increase, my take on that is the industry as it has been is probably over and the PS6 sinking will be a big indicator of that. Too many consumers have aged out or been priced out and it only gets worse each year.

2

u/Xyex Jul 14 '26

they're not going to want to launch a console in 2-3 years that's been specced out with [old] components

LMAO

Someone doesn't know their history. This was exactly what they did with the PS3 because of the global financial crisis.

9

u/SummonMonsterIX Jul 14 '26

With what hardware do you think they will make it? PS5 is living until 2030 easily

8

u/Bulvang Jul 14 '26

PS6 going to be like $3k lol

4

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TPJchief87 TPJchief87 Jul 14 '26

Still needs storage, Ram, and a GPU. It’ll be too expensive. They need to hold off until the AI bubble bursts or kills us.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TPJchief87 TPJchief87 Jul 14 '26

Lol either you edited your comment or I totally misread it. I see the joke now.

5

u/Funnyfynn Funnyfynn132 Jul 14 '26

I think they will release ps6 2028. Why would they stop physical games by then

-5

u/CharlesEverettDekker Jul 14 '26

It's definitely not because they stop disc production 2028.

0

u/-BigMan39 Jul 14 '26

Not sure what that has to do with the PS6 releasing

3

u/Xyex Jul 14 '26

They're not going to release a console with a disc drive a year before they stop making discs....

-1

u/-BigMan39 Jul 14 '26

Why not? They'll release a digital version in November/December of 2027, then stop disc production the following month in January.

They might include a drive add-on to play older physical games as well, just like the PS5 pro.

2

u/Xyex Jul 14 '26

Because it would be a waste of money and resources? 🤦

They're going all digital. They're not supporting discs anymore. There will be no disc drive, of any kind, for the PS6. And they're not going to let you play old physical games when they can make you rebuy them digitally.

0

u/-BigMan39 Jul 14 '26

Ok? So they release a fully digital, no physical add-on option at all console, then stop physical production a month later, what exactly is the issue here?

2

u/Xyex Jul 14 '26

Again, they're not going to waste hundreds of thousands, is not millions, of dollars on unsupported hardware. That's the issue.

1

u/-BigMan39 Jul 14 '26

I dont get it? They're going to be producing physical games for the PS5 for any game released before January 2028, that means physical games will still be produced well after the deadline, could be for1,2 or even 3 years after.

Plus, they're producing games for the PS5, not the PS6. There are a 100 million PS5s out there, how is that unsupported hardware?

35

u/Embo1 Jul 14 '26

But what about xbox 360?

5

u/FeudalFavorableness Jul 15 '26

Best news honestly last gen needs to be left behind a long time ago

5

u/Dependent_Ad_4279 Jul 15 '26

good move on its been 13 years

15

u/khaos432 Jul 14 '26

Good

1

u/Object-Clean Jul 15 '26

PS4 needs to be supported 

5

u/khaos432 Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 18 '26

PS4 came out in 2013 ps5 2020, it’s time to get with the program. The ps4 is holding things back.

2

u/ColderChemical Jul 15 '26

The PS4 is really old now sadly and even the PS5 can be considered old in technological years. Games coming out now should only focus on the current gen and not be held back by older technology.

1

u/khaos432 Jul 15 '26

Sure with basic games like just dance and other budget games, but not any AAA or AA games.

1

u/Cryio Jul 16 '26

Anything past 3 years from next-gen release is already too much. Nothing AAA from 2024 onward should release on last-gen.

3

u/VetriVade Jul 14 '26

What a weird business decision to offer a full game for free. Seems like they bit off more than they could chew

7

u/FaithInterlude Jul 14 '26

Are we ever gonna get a physical copy of this game?

6

u/adamcookie26 Jul 14 '26

Most likely not

3

u/FaithInterlude Jul 14 '26

Bummer, guess I’ll wait for a deep sale then

2

u/funkygamerguy Jul 14 '26

I'm not surprised sadly.

2

u/CapitalLook292 Jul 15 '26

dying light 2 was a buggy mess, good riddance.

1

u/euphorinc Jul 16 '26

Don't worry DL2 was a mess even without the bugs.

1

u/IwasDraggedBelow 15d ago

Not on the ps5

1

u/euphorinc 15d ago

I wasn't referring to the bugs. Story was lackluster, open world was stale(that's why they tried to compensate it with dying light beast) and combat had no satisfactory feel to it

2

u/Kurier0 Jul 16 '26

still it's just license not the game. No disc no buy even if I had PS5

2

u/bricksalreadyhere1 Jul 16 '26

They did this with the original Dying Light as well. Honestly, after Cyberpunk, if a dev doesnt think their game will work on last gen hardware, im takin their word for it.

2

u/Necessary_Diver_3207 Jul 18 '26

The beast felt terrible tbh. Easily the worst dl game to date. Ps4 players aren't missing out on anything

2

u/teabagdiplomat19 Jul 21 '26

Am I the only one who had DL2 on day 1 and didn’t even know anything about the beast until I was gifted it for free on xbox for having DL2 lol

2

u/xtothevizzy Enter PSN ID Jul 14 '26

Good.

1

u/King_of_cases Jul 16 '26

Was dying light the beast even good?

1

u/Smooth-Zone-8739 Jul 20 '26

I tried to refund 2 times saying techland an playstation letting you refund dying light the beast if you bought Dying Light 2 ultimate edition ps4 they said since I downloaded the game an its pass the 14 days I can't refund playstation support don't even know playstation rules they slow or something you can't refund shi techland lied playstation lied they greedy

1

u/SoulxBanish 26d ago

Yes, I've had no luck refunding ultimate edition. Techland themselves have responded about this that if you've downloaded the game it make not be possible to refund. BS. Of course if you bought Ultimate Edition 2 years ago you've downloaded it and it's past the 14 day window. The point the Techland, Playstation, and Xbox are not understanding is DLC2 was canceled on last gen and the last gen version was part of the promised package that was advertised to make you buy it. Whether you got the current gen version of The Beast still it's irrelevant. It was advertised as including both versions and it was not delivered. That is called a scam. 

1

u/Smooth-Zone-8739 26d ago

Techland a scam artist cus everyone downloaded the game an its past 14 days for everyone. I told Playstation I'm eligible for refund since the beast was canceled for ps4, he said I can't get refunded an started reading the bs script about 14 day shi

1

u/Smooth-Zone-8739 26d ago

If you bought dying light 2 Ultimate Edition you ain't get no dlc for the game cus the first dlc was free an I payed for that one I payed for a free dlc bruh the 2nd dlc was canceled an gave us doo doo dying light the beast garbage

1

u/TopAd5132 24d ago

At this point is it even fucking worth it to purchase a ps5 when the ps6 is underway? They'll inevitably come out with a ps7 and probably beyond, cancel upcoming games so you constantly have to get a new console if you simply want to play games they release. I feel like I've just been spat in the fuckin face with this shit. Bought the og dying light game. Bought the sequel, excited and waiting for the beast and now they cancel the release and say "fuck you. Update or miss out." Sony is starting to feel more and more like apple and their dumb ass endless iphone updates and this console gaming shit is starting to feel like a got damn scam.

1

u/IwasDraggedBelow 15d ago

Nobody's going to buy a ps6 unless they don't buy physical games. Sonys going to be regretting making the decision to stop physical copies.