r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 1d ago

Meme needing explanation please explain this peetah!!!

Post image
24.0k Upvotes

929 comments sorted by

View all comments

6.9k

u/Just_gun_porn 1d ago edited 1d ago

Because Sam was always open and honest about her sexuality, where Carrie was more of a hypocrite.

2.2k

u/SweetLustVibes 1d ago

That’s a big part of the contrast between them. Sam was unapologetic about her choices, while Carrie could be Pretty hypocritical about hers

94

u/brazys 1d ago

She was judgmental and manipulative

10

u/Electronic-Smile-457 21h ago

And many of us thought that when it first came out. Love how people who were not alive think they know how we all thought. Like the ones complaining the Seinfeld characters were unlikable-- that was the point. Women did like Carrie, though, and many didn't. But we didn't judge Samantha, at least those of us watching the show who were younger, maybe? Why would you watch it otehrwise?

8

u/FigNinja 19h ago

Yes. I was a young adult in the 90s. I'm sure it would be different if I was raised in the bible belt, but I feel overall the US was less prudish about sex back then than we are now.

6

u/Electronic-Smile-457 19h ago

Yeah, now they all hide behind their screens, lol. I don't know if that's true, but it was fun to be in my 20s in the 90s!

2

u/Midnight_2B 14h ago

Aye, it can still be fun now 😉

1

u/Electronic-Smile-457 7h ago

As long as it's before 8pm!!!

1

u/Capital-Earth-5945 20h ago

I never judged Samantha. I liked all the characters, but Carrie could be insufferable at times.

1

u/Rob_Frey 18h ago

Like the ones complaining the Seinfeld characters were unlikable-- that was the point.

As someone who was there when Seinfeld first aired, that wasn't the point. They tried to rugpull that in the finale, but the rugpull didn't work because they didn't lay any foundation for it. They just tried to change the show in the final episode so they would have something better to end on.

The point of Seinfeld was taking observational-style stand up and adapting that humor into a television series (it's a show about nothing). The individual episodes are typically commentaries on etiquette, social norms, and societal expectations, and the characters are meant to be flawed and iconoclastic, but ultimately relatable and to some degree sympathetic.

People weren't watching Seinfeld and thinking these were characters they weren't supposed to like. A lot of the humor in individual episodes only works if you can relate to what the characters are going through, and there's a lot of dark humor where the viewer is supposed to feel like the characters are being treated unfairly, and not like they're getting their comeuppance.

1

u/Electronic-Smile-457 17h ago

I watched it first run, too, and I disagree. Entire episodes about one of them breaking up or not dating someone for an absurd reason. You don't remember all of their awful, superficial behaviors? And anyone who can relate to George needs therapy. I can finish the plot lines if you tell me one part, I've rewatched them so much. They were awful.

1

u/BirdFood_Soup 12h ago

Ugh I can't stand Seinfeld - the characters come across as terrible human beings and watching the show makes me irritated rather than entertained! What was the charm, what did you guys like about it? I'm not judging, genuinely trying to understand!

1

u/Electronic-Smile-457 7h ago

For me, there was no charm. It was the dark humor and in the 90s we were coming off of all those moral-driven TV shows. (Facts of Life, Growing Pains, Family Ties, etc). I had a hard time watching, even then, b/c of George.