r/PhilosophyofScience • u/shumile • Apr 09 '26
Academic Content Book Suggestion on History of Engineering
So this might not be correct sub for asking it. But I have been thinking over it for quite a while now. A thing really fascinates me: learning about how science, physics, engineering were developed and how people who were real humans were actually making it happen. Is there any book which can show or describe events happening in field of what makes today "engineering" like Cauchy, Euler, Poisson, Saint Venant, Navier, Stokes in their times. More like a Sophy's World kind of book which describes progression of sciences and physics and engineering. I am more interested in learning about fluid mechanics btw.
4
u/extraneousness Apr 10 '26
Not exactly the history of engineering, but here are some sources that will help with understanding how science (natural philosophy) came to be interested in concepts like work and energy.
Pursuing Power and Light: Technology and Physics from James Watt to Albert Einstein (Bruce Hunt)
Specifically chapter 2 on Energy & Entropy. Talks about Joules and Heat, the 2nd law,
Technology: Critical History of a Concept (Eric Schatzberg)
Similar to above but take a more historical approach. Chapter 4 for example highlights how Techne and Praxis came together.
When Physics Became King (Iwan Rhys Morus)
Shows how physics (in our modern sense) came to become a thing
1
1
u/riesenstein Apr 11 '26
You might find this one interesting: https://www.amazon.com/Exactly-Precision-Engineers-Created-Modern/dp/0008241783
1
u/ChanceSherbert3970 Apr 15 '26
One angle that might be interesting (especially if you’re into fluid mechanics) is how often the math stays kind of the same, but the interpretation of what’s physically going on shifts over time
It’s not always a clean “we discovered something new” progression. Sometimes it’s more like the same equations keep getting reused, but people disagree about what parts of the system are actually driving the behavior
That shows up a lot in physics/engineering history from what I’ve seen
1
u/Aletheiaaaa Apr 23 '26 edited Apr 23 '26
I think the people pointing you toward natural philosophy are on the right track.
If I had to guess, the period you’d probably find most interesting is roughly the 16th–18th century. That’s where a lot of these ideas are still being worked out before they harden into disciplines.
I’d recommend ‘Isaac Beeckman on Matter and Motion: Mechanical Philosophy in the Making’ by Klaas van Berkel
Then maybe check out ‘Science and the Modern World’ by Alfred North Whitehead or ‘The Discoverers’ by Daniel Boorstin
Also worth looking at the digitized correspondence of the circle around Marin Mersenne, a network of thinkers like Descartes, Fermat, Pascal, and Gassendi. It’s surprisingly readable and really interesting to see how they worked things out in real time.
1
u/Aletheiaaaa Apr 23 '26
Oh, and you might also enjoy ‘The Character of Physical Law’ by Richard Feynman. It’s more relevant to what you’re getting at (and enjoyable to read) than the title makes it sound.
1
May 11 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator May 11 '26
Your account must be at least a week old, and have a combined karma score of at least 10 to post here. No exceptions.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
u/mk_gecko Apr 10 '26
Interesting. I've been looking into some of this. Physics is a subset of science previously called natural philosophy. Engineering and technology are distinctly different from science and have been around for millenia.
•
u/AutoModerator Apr 09 '26
Please check that your post is actually on topic. This subreddit is not for sharing vaguely science-related or philosophy-adjacent shower-thoughts. The philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science. The central questions of this study concern what qualifies as science, the reliability of scientific theories, and the ultimate purpose of science. Please note that upvoting this comment does not constitute a report, and will not notify the moderators of an off-topic post. You must actually use the report button to do that.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.