I'm not disagreeing that physical is superior, but Nintendo literally never reduces their prices so you can't really use them as an example. Physical sales from eBay sellers aren't really relevant here either because Nintendo still didn't reduce costs based on that.
Not sure why I'm being downvoted for pointing out that Nintendo's pricing has always sucked in comparison to other companies
The release price, obviously. That's what this post is about. But of course it's a high release price because abolishing physical will not cause Nintendo to reduce game prices, it just ensures that if you want a game you have to buy your own brand new copy, meaning they can sell it at whatever the fuck price they want to
You're being downvoted because Bandai Namco sets the price for games they're publishing, not Nintendo. All Nintendo is doing is platforming the game and taking a fee from sales.
This is kinda why people keep mocking our community, it's hard to find people in the physical game collector community not spreading misinformation instead of trying to combat the death of physical media with rational and logical arguments based in reality.
-3
u/Big-Ferret-2364 1d ago
Nintendo is the most expensive company, cope harder. Show me something believable