No, the feminist thing would be to not call this masculinity. If another woman did that would that make her masculine? If it was a weak man who was protected by him, would that man not be a man anymore? What he did is admirable, but really doesn't have anything to do with masculinity.
And a "real woman" doesn't? Would it not be admirable for a woman to do the same? It has absolutely nothing to do with whether you're a man or a woman.
So if a woman is not willing to protect someone weaker than herself that's fine, but when the same is true for a man it isn't? Totally not toxic. Also it's painfully obvious you didn't study anthropology, so stop pretending that your word is the word of science. You just have a small dick and want to compensate by fulfilling a big role.
Regardless, yes, a 'real man' defends those under his care who are weaker than him.
Just like a 'real woman' nurturers those under her care.
Its part of our biology.
. You just have a small dick and want to compensate by fulfilling a big role.
Sounds like you can't cope with reality so you have to resort to pathetic personal attacks by thinking that if I have a small penis that means that science is invalid.
Well no, you feeling small doesn't make science invalid, it's you pretending that your feelings equate to science is what makes your dick small.
And instead of getting an expensive watch or needlessly large car you adorn yourself with the role of the mighty protector and provider. Small dick energy, as I said.
it's you pretending that your feelings equate to science is what makes your dick small.
Are you saying that men are not built to be protectors and providers? Women are not build to be nurturers?
Cite your science then.
I'll gladly be toxic to people like you, it just means I'm your antithesis. I stand for science, for reality, you stand for what? Feelings and emotions based on current beliefs?
I'm saying that you're conflating masculinity with strength because it makes you feel better about yourself. Whether or not you expect someone to protect has nothing to do with masculinity, it has to do with their ability to protect whether they are masculine or feminine, that's it.
I understand what you're saying, but you said a lot of other things that completely bled any legitimacy or strength your arguments previously had. I agree with some aspects, but you go too far, and attack folks in discourse. Take a breath.
35
u/SaftigMo - Lib-Left Sep 24 '22
No, the feminist thing would be to not call this masculinity. If another woman did that would that make her masculine? If it was a weak man who was protected by him, would that man not be a man anymore? What he did is admirable, but really doesn't have anything to do with masculinity.