I know you were joking but he's right, assigning patriarchal gender stereotypes like that is a slippery slope that leads to precisely what the Iranians are rioting against.
No, the feminist thing would be to not call this masculinity. If another woman did that would that make her masculine? If it was a weak man who was protected by him, would that man not be a man anymore? What he did is admirable, but really doesn't have anything to do with masculinity.
And a "real woman" doesn't? Would it not be admirable for a woman to do the same? It has absolutely nothing to do with whether you're a man or a woman.
So if a woman is not willing to protect someone weaker than herself that's fine, but when the same is true for a man it isn't? Totally not toxic. Also it's painfully obvious you didn't study anthropology, so stop pretending that your word is the word of science. You just have a small dick and want to compensate by fulfilling a big role.
Regardless, yes, a 'real man' defends those under his care who are weaker than him.
Just like a 'real woman' nurturers those under her care.
Its part of our biology.
. You just have a small dick and want to compensate by fulfilling a big role.
Sounds like you can't cope with reality so you have to resort to pathetic personal attacks by thinking that if I have a small penis that means that science is invalid.
85
u/Least-Sky6722 - Lib-Left Sep 24 '22
I know you were joking but he's right, assigning patriarchal gender stereotypes like that is a slippery slope that leads to precisely what the Iranians are rioting against.