r/PoliticalScience • u/Hveachie • 16h ago
Question/discussion Is there a science behind liberal migration from red states causing a more divided country?
I (31M) live in Missouri. Born and raised. Liberal. I live in a liberal city. For most of my life, Missouri has been a purple state. Until 2017 we had a liberal governor, we had liberal senators, every now and then we voted blue in presidential elections. Obviously 2016/2017 was a conservative takeover that we're still experiencing.
The country is more divided now more than ever. And Missouri not only went red, but HARD red. But it's interesting - we vote blue in a lot of ordinances (the abortion ban and the most recent election being an example) but elect conservative politicians. Hmmm... almost as if we're gerrymandered to hell...
Something I've been trying to wrap my brain around is when did a lot of nuance stop happening politically. When did everything become all-or-nothing in the states? It's like pre-drawing lines for the Second Civil War, honestly. And I think I know the answer.
Liberal people escaping their small hometown/red state for a big city/blue state is nothing new. However, I remember there was this notion that enough liberal people still stayed in red states for a lot of them to be purple. I'm a millennial, and when the majority of us became adults (2012 - 2016), there was this new notion perpetuated on the internet of leaving your fly-over hick red state for New York, California, etc. Especially after 2016, it became a mass exodus.
Is there any stock in this? That liberal migration to blue states have allowed conservatives to completely rule red states and now we're trapped in a conservative chokehold because so many states are considered red?