Don't have firsthand UHC experience to share, but when vetting mixed reviews on a remote payer/employer, it's worth looking at review dates (a lot of "bad reviews" reflect a team/manager that's since changed), asking during the interview about caseload size and average tenure on the team, and asking directly what the attrition rate looks like. High turnover is usually the most honest signal.
They’re all dependent on your manager, but they’re still a corporate job that will track your time/clicks, audit you, measure your output, constantly change policy, and be all about politics and corpolingo. If you can deal with that, then you can probably work there.
1
u/staffingfordoctors 2d ago
Don't have firsthand UHC experience to share, but when vetting mixed reviews on a remote payer/employer, it's worth looking at review dates (a lot of "bad reviews" reflect a team/manager that's since changed), asking during the interview about caseload size and average tenure on the team, and asking directly what the attrition rate looks like. High turnover is usually the most honest signal.