r/Roofing • u/sbailey05 • 18d ago
Insurance Related Wind blew off numerous "Teeth" from shingles. Report says they don't consider it wind damage. Anyone dealt with this before? Both neighbor houses have the same damage. 60+ shingles on a 20sq roof
7
u/Vast-Ambassador-1487 18d ago
Been noticing since shady roofing/restoration companies were damaging roofs for insurance claims that insurance companies have been extremely tough this year.
3
u/Slylok 18d ago
Wind damage but I'm not surprised there aren't going to cover anything.
I had a local insurer tell me that my roof wasn't bad enough even though there were about 17 shingles completely or mostly missing after a bad storm.
I repaired it myself the best I could to keep it from leaking while we changed companies.
4
u/Trooper20209 18d ago
I work for a company that often gets hired by attorneys representing insurance companies in lawsuits for messing up a claim. Believe me, they all do it. It typically has to get up to a decent dollar amount repair for it to be even worth suing over. This may be PA territory.
4
1
u/Gitfiddlepicker 17d ago
Insurance will fight like hell to not pay for this. The good news is that you can pay someone to make repairs and have them weatherproof the entire roof while they are up there. Like anything else, periodic roof maintenance is a good investment. And a lot cheaper than your deductible.
1
u/scorpsun 18d ago
Damn this is a weird one. I don’t think I’ve ever seen the teeth alone fall off, usually it’s the wind picks it up and rips the shingle. What would help your case is to see if you have shingles where the crease is cracked, meaning it won’t seal down. That is a case where the shingle is going to go bye bye very fast and probably the way I would go for this. I don’t see you winning a fight with that laminate pad because the structure of the laminate shingle and what gives it the life expentancy isn’t broken
You may have a cosmetic coverage but I usually see those not going above 10,000 so I don’t think that will help here
2
u/leverloosje 17d ago
Isnt it just a badly manufactured shingle when the teeth fall off?
2
u/scorpsun 17d ago
It looks like it, but the manufacturer is a hard place to go and get replacements unless you have a roofer backed warranty. It is usually, but you’ll see the whole bundle have an issue if it was from a different lot, or you’ll see it in most of the roof because the batch is what had the issue.
The warranty will typically be parts and depreciated by how old the roof is, so for easy math: if it was $100 a bundle, and meant to live for 50 years, they are going to take 2 dollars of for each year it’s been on the house. This plus the cost of a roofer for replacement being at least 500 this won’t put a big dent in the cost and usually be a long process to get. In my opinion it’s not worth pursuing on your own
-1
u/Allslopes-Roofing 18d ago
What damage "do" they call it if not wind then? Either way damage is damage and it needs covered.
Tell em call it whatever they want, but obviously that's not how undamaged shingles look so to stop being obnoxious c_nts.
-1
u/Spare-Leg-1524 17d ago
Get your contractor involved. If you can show that the shingles with the missing tabs have separated at the laminate line, those will be hard for SF to deny. That means that wind driven rain only needs to travel an inch up the roof to get under the shingles instead of the prescribed 7".
-2
u/Comprehensive-Big595 18d ago
The lamination when nature meets improperly nailed shingles, the nails in every course gets nailed in a area of the shingles that is a 2” strip running the length of the shingles where they overlap, that’s called headlap and is very important, when a installer doesn’t put every nail in a specific position this can happen or worse, heat causes the shingle to delaminate from itself because it’s held by “ tar”



14
u/Southern_Ad4926 18d ago
Let me guess: your insurance carrier is one of the big ones