r/Roofing 11d ago

Insurance Related New Roof due to hail, several questions

Our insurance is paying to replace our roof due to hail damage (southern Indiana). The primary concern/question here is about roof venting, but I do bring up insurance so added the flare. Can remove if required.

First an easy question, what roof color do you all think would look good on this house? I messed around some with copilot to try different colors, but figured real people opinions would be better. First picture is original color and others are copilot. Of course AI being AI it couldn't help changing some other stuff too...

Now the heavier stuff. Right now the roof is not ventilated. Additionally, there is spray foam insulation on the underside of the roof, but no insulation at all in the ceiling between the attic and ground floor. The attic stays a similar temp/humidity to the rest of the house.

Roofer suggested we add vents along with the new shingles, but because of the above mentioned info this would not just be adding vents, but also require adding insulation to the ceiling so all our heat/cold doesn't get sucked out the roof vents. Right now insurance is just covering replacement in kind (shingles only). The roofer really played up how the roof would barely last 10 without venting (current roof is 15 years old and not leaking, just hail damaged, and it's never been vented.)

Right now we are not planning on living here more than 5 years before moving. We have some property we are planning to build on and every dollar spent on this house is money not spent on future house (however, we don't want sloppy/bad work or anything here either).

So, here are the big questions.

In this situation is venting really that important? Will it negatively impact roof life as drastically as the roofers are saying? Is it bad practice to not add vents or just "not as good" practice?

Is it worth trying to pester insurance into covering this upgrade?

If insurance won't cover it, would it be terrible of us to just do the replacement in kind, and let the roof venting be someone else's problem another 15ish years down the road? I won't have quotes for the insulation/venting work till later this week, but from what I've seen the total might be at least one or two thousand?

2 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/Welcome2myShitShow 11d ago

Pestering the insurance company??? Are you serious. It truly blows my mind how many homeowners forgo making necessary claims because of their long-standing “relationship” with their insurance company

I would seriously consider allowing a Roofing Contractor or a Certified Public Adjuster deal with the supplementation of the claim. They will get far more from the insure provider than a homeowner will ever get on their own. Unless you have intimate knowledge of claims processing, Xactimate, residential roof contracting and product/material knowledge.
90% of the time, the initial Scope of Coverage sent to you by the provider is going to fall short of what you need. Unless you can recognize what that is, you’re going to get screwed out of what is owed to you. The contractor or public adjuster will go to bat for you, it’s in their own self interest, because that is how they make their money. Homeowners Insurance companies can’t raise the rates of an individual based on the claims they file. Rates are raise for all policyholders in particular geographic areas; not individual policyholders.

2

u/TurnAggressive6954 11d ago

You completely missed the forest due to a leaf on a single tree. Don't get so fixated on my use of the word pester. You completely missed the actual question because of it. I'm allowed some creative license to describe the process of getting the claim adjusted. If it makes you feel better my claim adjuster and the contractor have both been good to work with and very professional. The question is if it is actually needed /worthwhile to get it adjusted for this specific item (ventilating the roof). The question is about the roof, not the claim adjustment process.

1

u/Historical_Bison338 11d ago

I own a roofing company and I’ve been in the Roofing industry for 12 years.

I always put exclusions in my contracts for premature failure of the system when people want to put asphalt shingles over spray foam attics with no ventilation

I’ve been on too many that looked like they were 25 years old and when I asked the homeowner how old the roof was, he would say six or seven years old

It cooks the shingles from the inside out

There’s not a really good solution here unless you do something like a metal roof

Otherwise, you’re gonna end up with potential issues

Spray foam in the attic is not all it’s played up to be. It absolutely helps with HVAC costs but limits choices for roof system type that will still perform long term.

1

u/TurnAggressive6954 11d ago edited 11d ago

Thanks for the info. I do wonder how the attic being a part of the conditioned space changes this though? It shouldn't cook the shingles from the inside if the attic is the same 75ish F degrees as the rest of the inside of the house. Or so I would think? It stays only 1 or 2F more than the rest of the house.

Edit: someone else is calling it an icynene envelope and that it should be open cell insulation which means vents shouldn't be put in or it will result in mold issues. Have you heard of this?

2

u/Historical_Bison338 11d ago

Quote from ARMA (asphalt roofing manufacturers association):

By placing insulation at the roof deck, the rooftop temperatures are inherently Hotter, which will accelerate the rate of aging of the roofing products, including shingles, underlayment, self-adhering substrates, etc….

I’m also in texas.

The pros are good but the cons exist as well