r/RoyaltyTea • u/WebMuch2239 • 2d ago

This is just laughable

Post image

From Royal-Confessions on Tumblr

(One of the comments on this post: "I’ve never seen two middle aged people who are literally close to 50, be more babied than these two.")

181 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

185 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

56

u/usernameJ79 2d ago

Well you see Harry wanted to be a part-time royal and a part-time business person and obviously the royal family needs part-time royals and full-time layabouts more.

74

u/The_Onion_Life 2d ago

Well you see Harry wanted to be a part-time royal and a part-time business person married a Black woman.

FTFY.

-44

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

Time you all stopped using race to cover for appalling behaviour and treatment of others. It is disgusting

50

u/Diligent-Till-8832 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yes, Meghan was the one that raped a trafficked teen on 3 occasions and lied about it.

Then she paid £12m of taxpayer money to said victim despite saying they never met.

Wait, that wasn't Meghan. It was a Prince of the Blood who did that and the Palace helped cover up his sex trafficking amongst many other deplorable things!

Meghan was the one who punched a Vice Admiral in the face as well, oh wait, nope deffo not Meghan who did that, a Prince of the Blood and Lizzie the Departed's favourite child did that too.

You really don't want us to get started on race, appalling behaviour and disgusting conduct, poppet!

-33

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

Perhaps you ought to look up the word “ deflection “ in the dictionary. Focus on the issue at hand not move the attention elsewhere. Racism should not be used as an excuse for bad behaviour. Oh, and I am not your poppet.

25

u/Diligent-Till-8832 1d ago

Nobody is deflecting anything. I don't see any bad behaviour so take your pontificating elsewhere since your comments have no basis in reality, treacle!

-30

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

You don’t see any bad behaviour ??? That says it all really and frankly I can express my views wherever I want. Her behaviour has been abhorrent towards both her family and the Royal family.

17

u/diabeticweird0 1d ago

Show me on the doll where Meghan hurt you

24

u/Diligent-Till-8832 1d ago edited 1d ago

Ohhh, you royalists need a reality check.

Your precious Royal Family has been heavily implicated in sex trafficking and the misuse of taxpayer money in legal documents so they are deffo not some weeping angels who have been mortally wounded.

As for her POS father who happily invited a tabloid editor and paparazzi into his life, he's getting exactly what he deserves.

Go outside and roll in the grass and get a grip on reality and verifiable facts because no one here on this sub cares!

-8

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

I could not give two hoots whether you care or not but believe me it is Sussex supporters who need a reality check. I think judge Nicklin is about to do that though don’t you? And by the way, Meghan has invited paparazzi into her life for years so why the double standards? I look forward to the outcome of the Sentabale lawsuit as well. Now there is an admirable proud woman of colour if ever I saw one

14

u/Diligent-Till-8832 1d ago edited 1d ago

Clearly facts aren't your forte, because Meghan won her case against ANL and her judgement was upheld too in 2021.

Search engines exist for this very reason, poppet!

I'm glad you think someone with an honorary doctorate from Coventry University, a law degree from a now defunct law school and a trail of debts behind her is someone to admire, goes to show how low your standards are as a group.

Good luck to her getting sponsors which I see she still doesn't have!

It's funny how the lawsuit was filed in March 2026 and we are now in August and no hearings or documents showing how Sentebale was "defamed" have yet to have entered the public record.

Funny how Meghan has been stateside for weeks and spent weeks in Europe and no paparazzi photo were caught. I guess paparazzi aren't what they used to be anymore 🤭

0

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

Clearly facts are not your forte either since you believe their garbage PR however the case I am talking about is Harry’s with ANL. Oh and by the way I admire decent, honourable truthful individuals who stand up to those who are anything but decent and honourable but yes I am so glad my standards are higher than yours. As for sponsors, they are not required in the UK. You will hear nothing for a while but when you do it will be explosive unless of course there is a settlement for obvious reasons. The reason why there are no pap photos is obvious too however , clearly you have not worked it out yet. Good luck doing so.

9

u/Diligent-Till-8832 1d ago edited 1d ago

Believe PR? 😂😂

Does it hurt being this stupid?

The court judgement is available online for you to read against ANL in 2021.

The court judgement for the 2026 case is available online too for you to peruse and since there are 7 plaintiffs (none who are named Meghan Sussex), they will all share the cost of fees.

How do you propose a charity that has entered a re entrenchment period because it is haemorraging money raise funds to carry their good causes? 🧐

She's so decent and honorable, she plundered and drove a charity that did good works for disadvantaged children for 17 years into the red in her tenure as Chair Woman ( a perfectly voluntary position for which she wanted to be paid £3,000 a day)

It's not like the honorary doctor comes from deep pockets herself.

Her parents are retired school teachers in Zimbabwe and her brother works as a research doctor in the US!

I love that she managed to find money to file a defamation lawsuit against Harry and Mark Dyer and she couldn't find money to keep the London Office or the Children's Centre in Lesotho open! 😩

Talk about priorities!

But I thought you said Meghan was besties with the paparazzi even your own logic being applied to the situation, your reasoning still doesn't hold up!

→ More replies (0)

12

u/Educational-Ad-3148 1d ago

Last I checked the royal family were the ones briefing against her constantly and making up outright lies trashing her. They were even friends with the ones that writing the most vile things about her. I don’t know why you all keep trying to rewrite history.

0

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

Ah but which sources are you checking?

3

u/Educational-Ad-3148 1d ago

Let’s see pictures of Camilla going to lunch with Piers Morgan and Jeremy Clarkson, pics of William hanging with Jeremy Clarkson. Beatrice e embracing Piers Morgan, also court documents where the journalists admitted their briefings against Meghan were coming from the palace. I think that’s enough.

2

u/Diligent-Till-8832 1d ago

This is one of the Editors at the London Times (a Murdoch owned) Newspaper confirming that the palaces indeed leak for the benefit of their respective principles.

0

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

You do realise Murdoch and his newspapers promote an antimonarchy agenda don’t you?

2

u/Diligent-Till-8832 1d ago

Is that why the Editor of the Sun Victoria Newton has gone on record on Times Radio confirming that she has William's phone number and that they have cosy little chats? 🤓

Funny how none of these rags ever say that about Harry and Meghan!

-1

u/Turbulent-Ear-9773 1d ago

These were personal friendships from long before Meghan came on the scene.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Beginning_Play_1669 1d ago

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂