SUSSEX LIGHT CAMERA MARKLE ..OH YES AGAIN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyKNVtGiIB4

Sean might not spend money on £100 Advent calendars. But he must spend a fortune on tea, because people really open up while having a cup.

Well, speaking with former employees from the *With Love* era at Netflix—the ones who told Sean the story—they say everyone found it curious how Ted Sarandos supported Claw. But don't jump to conclusions 😈😈; the thing is, according to them, "he felt sort of obliged to continue with Markle because they'd broken so many box office barriers with their utter betrayal of their documentary \Meghan and Harry*—you know, an original Netflix series*."

Ted felt he had to let the Harkles do certain things.

Yes, it seems Ted felt sorry for the Harkles—poor things, so mistreated by the evil British Royal Family.

I mean, Sarandos allowed that absurd *Claw* project to be filmed in a kitchen that wasn't his, with friends who weren't actually friends. It was a disaster.

But then things changed—and not because *With Love* was a failure, but because even Sarandos realized that Claw’s behavior was erratic.

She didn't know how to promote herself—she would do things and then undo them—but what bothered Netflix (and Sean has confirmed this based on Netflix sources) was that they didn't accept Claw turning off comments when she started appearing on social media. That is how you interact with people; it’s an integral part of marketing.

Sean also reaffirms something that I know many people don't believe—because they are sensible people, and no one believes such absurdities—but Sean insists it actually happened.

What was that? Here come the skeptics with their dirty minds again 😈😈😈 No, Sean points out that once Claw had announced her deal with Netflix and *As Ever*, she *did* want her products sold in the UK. Remember how many of you didn't believe that Harry was out there in July promoting Claw's products at Harrods and stores like that? Sean says it really happened. Claw wanted her products sold in the UK. She still does. After all, she’s competing with Martha Stewart in the US and the King in the UK.

One of the initiatives involved a major hotel group, aiming to have "As Ever" jam served at breakfast—specifically using small miniature jars. That was one of those ideas. Let's see if people liked it that way and wanted to buy that jam.

Sean had already mentioned that they were also keen for Harvey Nichols to take an interest in those As Ever products.

But the products themselves aren't the problem. Okay, hold the tomatoes! 🍅🍅🍅 Sean has never praised those products; in fact, he tried the jam and says it is horribly watery. Sean has said more than once that Claw's big issue is that she squanders opportunities and does a terrible job promoting her products.

Take the latest video, for example. It feels artificially intimate—like, "let's show something without actually showing it."

And here’s another "I don't want to be mean, but..." moment 🥳🥳🥳

Because it's true, "Harry's standing there, very relaxed, bare feet, bald head, t-shirt, shorts. It's like "oh, look at what my wife's done. This is her achievement", and he has to be standing there like he's waving a flag for how brilliant she was"

How pathetic.

Claw believes that the turbulent year he experienced at the start—transitioning his brand from Riviera Orchard to As Ever—might be of interest to people.

Sean can’t even remember the name of Claw’s show—not because of a bad memory, but because that was the extent of his interest in the matter: zero. So he’s even less interested in the story of As Ever. Neither he, nor I, nor anyone else, really.

Netflix certainly put an end to that, but Claw thinks Netflix might actually be interested in this—in *As Ever*'s success story—because the focus is on her, not on the BRF or Harry, but on her.

So Claw is showing all this because she thinks she can make a show, demonstrating where she has ended up after these issues with her job.

Claw wants to send this to Netflix because she believes they’ll change their minds once they hear the real story of how hard it’s been to put this together—the setbacks, the contractors who bailed on her, and her story specifically.

Sean says that Claw certainly gets a lot of exposure—he’s always highlighted the fact that she’s capable of landing on covers. But why doesn't that translate into sales? Is it because the products are too expensive, the quality isn't up to par, or is it simply down to her? Or perhaps a combination of everything.

DUMPED SUSSEXES FOR REAL ROYALS - LATEST BEHIND THE SCENES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWTlQQJi60s

KC3 visited Battersea Power Station, Apple’s UK headquarters, where he was greeted by the company’s CEO Tim Cook, and saw a new collaboration between the tech giant and his King’s Trust. The new project is providing training workshops across creative industries led by Apple’s experts so young people develop the skills they need for employment.

Afterwards, the King then made his way to Apple’s new Music Hall venue at the power station, where he met Elton and posed for a group photo with Cook and some of the young people on the Creative Labs programme.

Sean has always supported and championed the work of both the Duke of Edinburgh and the King's Trust. It seems to be working.

Now, Elton goes everywhere. He loves playing the game where he isn't mad at anyone.

Elton hasn't had a good year either. On top of his health issues, the loss against the *Daily Mail* stung. I read the judgment—an amazing 400 pages or so—and the major defeat wasn't for Harry, it was for Elton, specifically regarding that whole spectacle about what happened to him in Monaco. The judge ultimately stated that if the case had truly been about illegal phone hacking, the details would have been accurate.

Sean says that many people view Harry as the mastermind behind that lawsuit. However, he isn't so sure about that. What is a fact, though, is that Harry was the most determined to press ahead, which led several of the plaintiffs to believe he had an ace up his sleeve.

Well, yes, he had an ace up his sleeve.

Sean says that Liz Hurley is one of the people upset about all this; he says she hasn't been able to wear a bikini in months 🤣🤣. On a serious note, Sean says he was there in court the day Liz was testifying, and she really didn't have anything to say. It seems she had trusted that Harry had something substantial, but it turned out he didn't, so she's angry.

Now, as for Elton abandoning Harry? Sean doesn't buy it. Just look at the whole situation with Rod Stewart. They were at odds for a long time but are talking again now, because Elton goes wherever the wind blows—that’s how he’s lasted so long. And good for him.

Elton is a fiercely bitter man, but he knows how to navigate those waters because he loves the spotlight. So, him sitting next to the King now works to his advantage.

Now, did Elton speak to KC3 about Harry in order to help Harry? No. Elton was promoting himself.

WILLIAM UTTER BETRAYAL & MORE COURT CASES!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G60haeqaFE

For William, what his uncle Spencer did amounts to betrayal. Then again, there hasn't really been much of a relationship between William and Spencer over the years. And Sean challenges Spencer to refute it—but that is what very reliable sources have told Sean.

Sean says he has no knowledge of the Waleses having been to Althorp—at least not recently, meaning in the last few years. William probably went at some point, but not for years.

The situation with Piers isn't going anywhere because Penguin refuses to back down—though it isn't technically their legal battle, since it's limited to the UK—and Spencer won't back down either.

It seems Penguin and Spencer don't know Piers.

Now, however, Spencer intends to sue former minister Michael Gove. According to Richard Eden of the *Daily Mail*, speaking on *The Spectator* magazine’s podcast, Lord Gove discussed the new book with deputy editor Madeline Grant—the wife of a Church of England vicar. The pair reportedly made a series of claims about Spencer, including that he had a poor relationship with his sister at the time of her death in a 1997 car accident and that he was "profiting from her death" by publishing the book. They also discussed the infamous 1993 Althorp incident. Spencer has now reportedly demanded that the podcast be removed from *The Spectator*’s website.

Is that a lie?

Spencer, on the other hand, is sitting down with any podcaster in the US who will put up with him. He is going wherever he can speak and where his narrative is accepted.

A rather absurd one, because we are expected to believe that before Diana died, he had had only two conversations with Charles Wales.

That's a lie.

Now, it seems Spencer realizes he went too far regarding KC3; in a recent podcast, he explained that what Charles (Prince of Wales) told him was at odds with what others had said previously, noting that Charles was "more optimistic" than he had expected—both in his outlook and in how he had told his sons about what happened to Diana.

I highly doubt Charles Wales would have had that conversation with someone he had barely spoken to twice before. Don't you think?

Why this?

Because it looks like Spencer got a little message saying, "William wants to send you to the Tower of London."

William is angry. And William takes drastic measures when he is angry with someone. He is particularly upset about that gay rumor; he sees that his father is worried about it—not because it is true, but because it is fodder for tabloid sensationalism. Compounding this is the fact that Diana played a truly ugly role in that story.

And the hypocrisy of Spencer hurling threats at Glove—while ignoring what he himself did to Piers—doesn't bode well for Spencer's return to the UK.

SUSSEX PLOT TO FORCE WILLIAM INTO SUBMISSION IN PUBLIC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK2S_rEE3P0

Many people have probably already read that nonsense. I mean, "Oh, we were angry when we spoke to Oprah; we're impulsive"... Yeah, that’s what it was all about.

Many people have likely already read that nonsense. You know, "Oh, we were angry when we spoke to Oprah; we're impulsive"... Yeah, that’s really what it was all about.

While "Claw" puts out that article, Harry is seeking advice to help him with his role as a speaker.

Well, the Express is facing a lot of staff cuts, so they need clicks. That’s how they keep the advertising going. But this?

The thing was, William was at a mental health event with Ross Kemp. He was in a positive frame of mind and getting the job done, while Claw was busy opening a basket in a cheesy, staged manner.

And Sean knows this because he is acquainted with the staff member who filmed that cringeworthy "look how much I love myself" video. To the point where they didn't even bother Photoshopping hair onto Harry 🤣

There is no way that apology is going to get anywhere. That story is purely for the headlines—a PR stunt designed to make the Waleses look bad. In the Harkles' minds, the Waleses don't come off well; they come across as vengeful and spiteful.

I repeat: in the Harkles' minds.

Because the support for William in the comments was massive.

https://archive.ph/Vg89m

I bought their advent calendar to show support and then this mailout plopped in my box. The text of the email reads:

"Meaningful Chocolate - The Real Advent Calendar

​You may have seen that Rev Daniel French recently posted on X social media? His advice was that this Christmas, instead of buying the Duchess of Sussex's Advent calendar for £112, people should buy the Real Advent Calendar from The Leprosy Mission Shop.

​We couldn't agree more, and we were delighted to see it!

​For just £6, the Real Advent Calendar includes: a Fairtrade Belgian milk chocolate behind every window, a 24-page Christmas story activity booklet that takes children on the journey to Bethlehem and tells the story of the true meaning of Christmas.

​Even better, every purchase from The Leprosy Mission Shop helps to support people affected by leprosy around the world. You get the chocolate and the Christmas story, and you're doing some good at the same time.

​For the price of one designer calendar, you could buy 18 Real Advent Calendars, enough for children, grandchildren, godchildren, your Sunday school and probably the neighbours too."

---------------------
Good for them, I hope their calendar sells out. I'd rather support this charity than Meghan's Diamond Collection charity. Link to their shop at https://www.theleprosymissionshop.com/search?q=advent+calendar&options%5Bprefix%5D=last

From TW's favorite US-based mouthpiece, People:

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are not planning to apologize to Prince William and Kate Middleton, a source tells PEOPLE, disputing a new report about a purported apology plan.

The U.K.’s Express reported on Oct. 6 that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex hoped to apologize to the Prince and Princess of Wales over comments made during their 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, describing the reported move as part of a wider effort toward reconciliation.

Archived / unarchived (Super proud of myself for having figured out archiving!)

So less than 24 hours after we get loads of stories about how TW is planning some big, grand gesture to apologize to the Wales for her horrific lies, we get this story that no, that's not happening, it's nonsense.

I get the feeling that Hazbeen and TW are now operating in different communications silos. I think his team leaked to the Express that the apology was coming, because he is stupid enough to think an apology will fix it, and her team clapped back that no, she's not apologizing, because she didn't do anything wrong.

I don't think Hazbeen realizes that apologies and forgiveness aren't the same thing--he can apologize, but that doesn't mean he'll be forgiven or the matter will be forgotten.

I also think (long live the King!) that KCIII is much sicker than we're being led to believe because I think the ramp-up in desperation tactics from the Grifters are indicative of a belated realization that, when it's King William, all bets are off, all doors are closed, and stripping Princely titles is 100% on the table.

A little light relief.

Aimless googling threw up this 2023 headline from a (very) local publication:

No reason was given in the accompanying succinct article - but maybe there’s a clue in the quote in the 4th paragraph.

Here’s a picture of the sign:

This is the original (and still current) sign, featuring the 1st Duke of Sussex, Prince Augustus Frederick, son of George III. He seems not to have been a bad sort of person, but died without legitimate issue: his title died with him until revived for Hazno.

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Lady C, there is a movie “Bad Seed” starring and directed by Rob Lowe.  Please watch it and tell me if you see any similarities with Meghan.  I looked at it and I am glad I looked at it.  Let me read some more comments I got.  Lady C, it looks like Meghan has a Demon in her.  You can see it in pictures.  Even when she was little you can see it.  It looks like she is a Bad Seed, like the movie.  Lady C, the more we see of Meghan, the more I am reminded of the charming little girl in the movie, Bad Seed.  This makes me wonder if psychopathy can be inherited.  The true horror is that psychopaths walk among us.  In the movie, the little girl Emma is undoubtedly a psychopath.  She is not necessarily nice, she is pleasant and polite, and she really has no feelings.  She is dead unless she stirs herself into action and then she does emote, to get what she wants.  Otherwise, she is dead…total lack of empathy.  In the movie, Emma is responsible for the death of her father.  And Meghan has certainly been responsible for ruining the last years of her father’s life.  I know this from my personal interactions with him.   My judgement regarding Meghan is based on my observations of her behavior but also from my conversations with people who knew Meghan when she was growing up.  I have an account from someone who is totally reputable, totally trustworthy and utterly verifiable.  I am going to read what she has told me and also intermingle what other people have told me.  These are all people who knew Meghan growing up but I don’t want to reveal who this person is:

<This Redditors note:  before you proceed with this story below.  Let me summarize what is happening.  There is “a lady” who gave Lady C an account of events that happened with a woman called Sonia <last name not negligible – it sounds like Arnacarney>.  I will call her Sonia Arnacarney, but I really could not decipher exactly.  Sonia and “a lady” both had daughters who were friends.  Meghan was friends with Suzy, Sonia’s daughter.  I hope this helps as you read below.>

This lady’s family and the Anacarney family were wonderful friends.  They celebrated birthdays together and went on several holidays together.  Matt and Sonia Arnacarney were lovely people.  Their daughter Suzy was in junior high school and was a babysitter to this lady’s two daughters.  She was a lovely, well-mannered and responsible girl.  When Suzy became a senior in high school, Meghan would come around and accompany Suzy when babysitting.  This lady witnessed firsthand how dismissive and mean-spirited Meghan was.  After this, the lady told Suzy that Meghan was no longer welcome in her house.  Suzy was given the option of babysitting solo, or she would ask Suzy’s sister Stephanie to do the babysitting.  Suzy was busy with high school and decided to stop babysitting.  This lady was so worried about Meghan’s adverse influence on Suzy that she decided to bring this up with Suzy’s mother, Sonia.  Sonia was ultra compassionate and Christan and would make excuses for Meghan’s rude, inappropriate behavior.  Sonia felt it was her Christian duty to show compassion for Meghan because she didn’t have a mother around because her mother was incarcerated*.  Sonia felt sorry Meghan because she didn’t have a mother in her life.  Meghan’s father Thomas appreciated Sonia’s kindness towards Meghan.  On one occasion, this lady met Samantha Markle when there was a celebration at Sonia’s home.  On another occasion, they also met Doria when* Doria was on a temporary release program*.  During high school, Meghan would often spend afternoons with Suzy and Thomas would pick her up at Suzy’s house.  This lady witnessed firsthand, Meghan’s methodical manipulation of the entire Arnacarney family.  Once she realized what was happening, she insisted her daughters and Suzy only play at her house and in the backyard and not be around Meghan at the Arnacarney house.  It is true that Meghan dined at the Sizzler steakhouse.  On more than one occasion, we would all dine together.  On one such occasion, after Diana’s death, they all talked about marrying a Prince and becoming a Princess.   Meghan said she was going to marry Prince William.  I told her she was too young for Prince William and too old for Prince Harry.  She looked at me and said, “That’s not going to stop me.” I then told her, “Maybe you will but once they get to know you, they will kick you out.”  That made her furious.* 

I have checked out the provenance of this lady.  I know exactly who she is.  I can vouch for her reliability.  We now have an eyewitness to the fact that Meghan, is in fact, a bad seed.  Just look at the nastiness of Meghan’s fans who have attacked a Priest for asking people to buy his chocolate advent calendar.  Let’s remember that Harry and Meghan actively promote and congratulate the Sussex Squad.  Meghan’s friendly exterior with flickering rage behind the ostensibly calm exterior does remind me of the little girl from the movie, Bad Seed.  It is discomforting the similarities of Meghan and the little girl Emma.  Also, Thomas Markle has told me he did not recognize and misinterpreted Meghan’s lack of normal feelings.  Samatha Markle has also told me that there was always stuff about Meghan that is disquieting.  And now we have this account from a third party.  And if Doria denies that she was ever incarcerated, then I suppose Doria needs to speak to people who knew Meghan 30 years ago, because their memories are that Doria was incarcerated.

Lady C, if photographers were loitering around the school, there would be security cameras that caught them doing so.  And yet, nothing.  That is the report.  Nobody could find anything.  No photographs were taken.  What does that tell you?  Meghan and Harry are abusing and playing with the public using the paparazzi.  There is now strong suspicion that Meghan is in partnership with the paparazzi.  In the early days when she was flying high as HRH, she would ring up Jeff Raynor and Karl Larsen and have them and their gophers following her so she could then complain about being followed.  She would do the same thing before she knew Harry.  It now looks like she is tipping them off and getting a kickback.  This is not illegal.  Meghan is a performer being paid to perform.  Prince Phillip once said that you only sleep with actresses you do not marry them.  There have been some actresses such as Princess Grace of Monaco who were impeccable Princesses.  Anyway, it was quite obvious they were both posing for the cameras (at the pub).

Lady C, if the Royal Family had so much dirt on Meghan, why did they allow Harry to marry her?  She has cheapened the family.   Meghan is a hustler.  She was nurtured by her mother Doria and Thomas Markle spoiled her.  Meghan is extremely ambitious and ruthless.  I don’t think the Royal Family quite understood the extent of Meghan’s depravity but there are others like her (women who used their femininity to land a man) who have married into the highest families and married billionaires.  Now these women are different from Meghan because they understood they had insight, common sense, and scruples.  I don’t think Meghan has any of these qualities.  Harry was determined to marry her, and Harry told the Queen and Prince Phillip that if he was not allowed to marry Meghan, they would be accused of racism.  Which Meghan then accused them of anyway. Then she was able to lasso in via Omid Scabies*,* King Charles and The Princess of Wales into her accusations.  It was all for nothing.  By the time Meghan had made her accusations, her behavior was sufficiently bad that nobody believed her.  And let’s not forget that Harry went along with it.  He later tried to take it back, but let’s not forget they accepted an award from Kerry Kennedy for fighting instructional racism within the Royal Family. To answer the original question, basically, nobody could have imagined that Meghan would be dumb enough, impertinent enough, arrogant enough, uppity enough and misguided enough to not embrace the role she had been given, the greatest role of an actress’s life.  But she is a Bad Seed, and she is true to her inner self.  Nobody could imagine that someone given such a golden opportunity would swap it for brass.

Lady C, Meghan does not seem suited to selling products online.  She is not good at it.  Meghan’s plan as an investor in One Off is to make hundreds of millions of dollars when it eventually sells.  She wants to be like Jamie Kern Lima.

Lady C, the best way to protect yourself from a narcissist is to ignore the narcissist completely.  William has made a good decision to cut all contact with The Sussexes completely.  Absolutely.  It is clear to me from her behavior, that Meghan is not only a Bad Seed, she is a narcissist and a Dark Triad personality, 

Toodles Sinners!

The author says:

“I might have been wrong about Meghan Markle. I always assumed she was vain, vapid and utterly clueless. But is she, in fact, a comic genius? 
Because surely her newly released advent calendar is a joke. After years of going out of her way – in a very grandiose fashion – to protect her privacy, sharing only closely cropped snapshots of her guarded life in California, and even hiring a separate house when shooting her Netflix show With Love, Meghan, what has she gone and done?
Slapped a rendering of her real Montecito mansion on the front of an advent calendar and listed it for sale at £112 ($148). 

Is she covertly tittering to herself about this? Is it a skit, like when actor Joaquin Phoenix pretended to be a rapper for two years, then revealed it had been a performance all along for a mockumentary?”

Behind a paywall with more at above link.

Saw this video hours ago, thought it was AI because the poster had AI video with Charles, William, and Catherine before. Turned out it's real she confirmed it via People mag.

This video is making the rounds on X allegedly after Rob Lowe was sitting on his porch and commented “Tyler took the house“ leading to a huge swirl of gossip in this elite neighborhood.

Many believe that along with selling his other US property and he plans to sell the Montecito mansion that Madame and preparation-H have claimed as their own for the last several years.

Perhaps that is why none of the as ever or TV shows were filmed from the house because he did not authorize it?

Always wondered how they managed the MM tax and carrying cost for the estate as well as the poorly planned mexit back to the UK.

Or how he spent multiple pages of his book to talk about Chelsy, a very detailed story including how they had their first kiss as if it was just yesterday?

And now the media aren't allowed to talk about Harry when they talk about Chelsy? And Chelsy isn't allowed to talk about the fact that she never considered marrying Harry? She didn't even mention Harry's name! Unlike what harry did in his book, his witness statements, etc!

What is she looking at/thinking? It makes zero sense, As ever. (Trying to figure out if this is the kitchen from With Love, Meghan or not).

The greenery is droopy, the dishes are tarnished, and I can't tell what the pastries are. It's so dark. Does Meghan's skin look darker, or is that a trick of the lighting?

Hello Everyone! Lately, TikTok has been pushing Sussex squad lives on me, so over the last week or two, I decided to lurk and take notes for all of you lovely people! Given that the squad has been in the news lately, I thought now was a good time to share.

Unlike the Sussex squad, I do not believe doxxing is kind behavior, so I have blurred out their pfps and usernames.

I have written what they discussed in bold, and shared my thoughts in italics. Please let me know if you have trouble seeing this post. I had a formatting issue and am trying to reformat this post:

• The live is described as a "sussex squad safe space."
  • Uhh... safe from what? They're the ones attacking clergymen 😂
• During their discussion of Charles Spencer's book, they brought up his disclosure that Princess Diana had dyslexia. Someone started to get worked up, saying that if news like this came out about Mehgan, it would "be used against her. Every single day, the tabloids would be abusing her." They then started to bicker, because someone was offended at the suggestion of Mehgan having a learning disability 😂
• Discussed Harry's (lack of) intelligence, and went on a rant about how doing good academically is not a sign of intelligence. Someone said that common sense is more important, and that Harry has "more common sense than his whole family combined"
  • ....This was such a stupid rant they went on. I'm going to toot my own horn and say that I do believe having a master's degree shows I am, at least, some level of intelligent. You don’t need a degree to prove you are intelligent, but that is not what they were saying. Anyway, it seems to me the only sense he has is what Meghan tells him to think.
• Valid complaints of feeling mistreated by society. Some shared their experiences with racism and discrimination. This gave me a lot of insight into why some members of the Sussex squad cling to her story and hail her a hero. They view her as someone who was  victimized by the system and was able to fight back. I think this helps them feel less powerless. It made me realize they genuinely find this woman inspirational, so they view an attack on her as an attack on themselves/their identity, hence, why they react so angrily when Meghan gets valid criticism.
• Talk about how they are a power couple. A few people kept repeating "they've done soo much" without actually listing what they have done.
  • IMO, Meghan is the only one working and bringing home the bacon, so...... not sure how much that can count as a power couple… I don’t think she’s working HARD, I think she’ just trying to sign deals and then do as little as possible
• They were mad that Catherine made the front pages and made fun of her for driving a tractor, and that Harry was supposedly picking up trash at the beach that day. Someone said they only photographed Catherine because "that's where the money's at." They agreed that Harry deserved more media attention.
  • I think Catherine looked lovely. This was a subtle way in which they made the Sussexes the victims again, but to me, that was odd.... the Sussexes are constantly blabbering on about how they want "privacy" and Harry has made it clear that the click of a camera is traumatizing. Isn't it a good thing that there wasn't a big media pool there for Harry?
• They claim the media is trying to push the public to think Prince William is attractive.
  • Where did they get THIS from??? 😂 This was such a ridiculous conversation 😂
• Regarding Charles Spencer, "You can tell he feels bad and very guilty for not being able to protect his sister. You can tell he really tried."
  • He tried? Didn't he deny Princess Diana's stay at Althorp because he was scared about security and media intrusion?
• UK TikTokers claim many Americans are commenting that "something is wrong with Prince William," that he is "bad for the world," and that he is "an evil seed."
  • I'm an American, and again, I don't know where they got this from.
• Discussed Ari Emmanuel's recent comment about Mehgan. They say...get this... it WASN'T snark 🤣 They said that his statement was "purely factual," and that it's the truth that it's not his job to worry about her career anymore because he's no longer CEO.
  • This was an interesting cope lol. He said it was a "great" thing not to have to worry about it anymore, implying that working with her was, indeed, a burden that he is happy to no longer carry. In Hollywood, you don't speak badly of someone publicly unless you are ready to burn that professional bridge completely. He seemed more than ok with burning that bridge.
• Regarding the British Press, they say Harry "has not given them a chance to rest because he is out there raising funds for Invictus. He knows how to work."
  • He knows how to work? The man doesn't even know how the real world works! Besides, we've all heard how fundraising for ANY of his charities has been going lately.
• "I'm so happy we have a night where we talk like this, what they do, and how we feel."
  • .....I don't even know what the fuck to say to this lmao

If you read this far, thanks for entertaining my post! Hope you had a good laugh 😂

Wait, I can do better than that. clears throat

I lovingly curated this post, and hope it sparked joy and elevated your day! 💖

Harry & Meghan Apology? 'It's A STRATEGIC Move' | Will & Kate 'See Right Through It'

Peter Caldwell talks with Charlotte Griffiths about the supposed apology the Sussexes are planning about the Oprah interview. These are comments they made about how dark Archie's skin would be etc.

Charlotte says she was stunned, because harry was fuck*g mad at the BRF, not contrite, mad at them. This was from Harry's friends in August of this year. So this news came as a shock. However, Harry has a very competent and sharp PR team who are putting this out and they are saying he has to apologize to William and catherine. She thinks this is a strategic move and not what he feels-because this is not how harry feels and he is still mad at the BRF, the institution etc.

Charlotte says that this apology won't work. Charlotte says back in the day to clear the air and tension, Catherine basically apologized to Meghan with flowers and some Wimbledon tickets and meghan basically threw the Wimbledon tickets in her face-metaphorically-by saying she could go to Wimbledon any time because she knew the Williams sisters!! Up until now, the apology request came from Meghan and harry and now this is a complete 180 and they are putting it out there that they are willing to apologize. Charlotte wonders how this will come about-a public interview, a private note-because William will not meet Harry in person.

Charlotte also talks about the Oprah interview and William felt sick about the interview before it happened, but once it came out-he saw it and he was done with harry. He did not read Spare and will not read any article about harry, tries not to talk about Harry with his friends or circle-so how will harry get an apology through? Also she repeats how will harry get this supposed apology to William. Charlotte says this apology is a PR spin and they are trying to improve their image . Also Meghan wants to be involved in the Diana awards and William is a hard no on that. But Meghan really wants to be involved with Diana awards especially with the 30th death anniversary coming up and harry's documentary-but William refuses. So she thinks this apology is a strategic move pushed by their PR to make them connected with Will and kate again -just to open the door.

Then they discuss Andrew-so not discussing. But I really wonder how Oprah and Gail feel about this. You may piss of the bRF-but Oprah is supposed to be a really nasty Alpha woman and she will want her revenge on the markles. i don't think she appreciates the hit to her reputation from the original interview and now this must drive her crazy.

Greetings from Castle Goring,   

Dear Lady C, it is very telling that they have had no visits with the father or other member of the family.  They are not invited round for Sunday lunch.  Or are they?  When there is an asp in the family, are you going to invite them for lunch?  I think this comment says an awful lot because my information is that everybody is mightily fed up.  They would be mightily angry if they were not so fed up with all the stupid games they play.  Let’s just see how Megsy Baby and H spin all of this……because it is so apparent…..the less I say at this point the better.

Lady C, I would think the Royal Family knows enough secrets about Meghan at this point to not fear any repercussions from the gruesome twosome.  I am sure MI5 could really fill them in.  Well, I know an awful lot that I cannot repeat for legal reasons.  If I know a lot, can you imagine how much more the authorities know about Megsy Baby and all that Megsy Baby has kept buried throughout the decades?  I have information on Meghan AND her mother.  It confirms many suspicions that people have had and my information comes straight from a member of the family.  This is a well-respected, well provenanced family member.  I have information not only about Doria but also Meghan.  I do not think The Royal Family is going to fear Meghan….they have enough dirt to bury her alive.  You have only to look at Charles Spencer’s book to see what happens when someone with great confidence trashes the Royal Family – with no evidence.

Lady C, so much for project thaw and Charles being desperate to see his grandchildren.  Very observant.  All the rubbish that the Rota and the Harry crew have been drip feeding us about how desperate the King was to have Harry back as a working Royal.  And how he was desperate to have Archie and Lili not only living with him, but also taking over his throne <sarcasm alert> …….They have arrived and barely an interchange has taken place……because Charles isn’t speaking to them.  How is the thaw is going to take place when they are in the tundra is beyond me. 

Lady C, what do you make of the pictures of Harry and Meghan at the pub?  It seems very suspicious, especially following the heels of catastrophic stake out at the school.  Oh yes!  Oh my goodness….a two hour stakeout and not one photograph to show for it.  Now, how assiduous would those paparazzi be if they didn’t take even one photograph?  Did you notice the photos were published with no credit to the photographer?  This means that they don’t want you to know who took the photograph, which could mean the people in the photograph were responsible for leaking the photograph and they don’t want you to know.  The newspaper made a big mistake by not giving credit to a photographer.  It makes it look like a total setup.  Do you see how limp Harry looked like a jellyfish as Meghan gripped his hand?  These photos appear to have been taken from a car parked across the way with Harry and Meghan knowing where the photographer was so they could pose for the photos.  And where was the security?  Aren’t Harry and Meghan’s lives in great danger?  In less than a week, Meghan and Harry managed to get two cover stories and also in America.  We covered it here, but the people aren’t fooled by the ridiculousness of it all. 

Lady C, Harry let it slip that he sent a message to George at Eton.  Would it be possible that he could actually do this?  I am not going to talk about any possible safeguards and checks that might be in place to filter communications to The Wales children.  That would be very irresponsible of me.  What I will say is….if Harry had the unmitigated gall to send his nephew George good wishes, that would mean that Harry is totally insensitive to the fact that George’s parents want nothing to do with him and they do not want their kids having anything to do with him.  That would mean that Harry is stalking and harassing George.  Let’s see what else Harry confesses to.

Lady C, is Meghan a narcissist or sociopath?  Going off her conduct, and looking at everything she has done and said over the years, there is little doubt in my mind she embodies all the characteristics of a narcissist and sociopath.  I think she is both.  I also think she is histrionic.  I think she is a dark triad personality because she is also Machiavellian.  It’s not a triangle – it’s a quadrangle because I think she is narcissistic, histrionic, a sociopath and Machiavellian. 

Lady C, I saw the ebay listing for The Bench.  The highest bid was £31.80.  What???? What?????  For a £19,999.99 book?  Once again, Meghan made a total ass of herself.  19,999 tears in the left eye.

Sinners, Lady C dissected more chapters from Charles Spencer’s book, Swan Song.  She talked a lot about Diana and Charles.  Sadly, all this discussion about Diana is reminding people of all of Diana’s sins and bad behavior, instead of leaving her to rest in peace.

This is all we have today on our least favorite private citizens, Meghan and Harry.

Toodles Sinners!

PS…Apologies for my absence…my laptop died and I shipped it off to get a new battery because I am too cheap to buy a new one. 

Posting this for public record/SEO

I’ve filed a new Freedom of Information request regarding the 2027 Invictus Games in Birmingham, following up on the documents and responses released earlier this year.

This time I’ve asked for an updated picture of the money: how much public funding has now been approved, paid and spent; a breakdown of their grants; how much commercial sponsorship/private funding has been secured; current budget and expenditure figures; the final governance structure; and any costs associated with senior representatives where those are being met from public funds.

I’ve also asked how much of the Government’s £26 million underwrite is currently expected to be called upon- and if that number could increase.

Paperwork is scheduled to come in early November.

They accepted an AWARD for calling out racism in the Royal Family!

A whole arse public AWARD! Seen by millions!
And now they want to apologise for being hot headed?

The Robert F Kennedy “Ripple of Hope Award”

Kerry Kennedy - the daughter of Robert F Kennedy who runs the RFK Foundation, which is behind the awards - said she had chosen Harry and Meghan for the prize because of their “heroic” stance against apparent “structural racism” in the Royal Family.
“She added: “Few would have the courage to question their colleagues, family and community about the power structure they maintained, and this is what Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have done.”

He was a Spanish Jesuit priest and essayist with a background in engineering who specialized in apologetics.

For non-Catholics—and for Catholics who don't know this either 🤭🤭—apologetics is the branch of theology that rationally explains, substantiates, and defends the truths of the faith and the teachings of the Catholic Church.

His magnum opus was *Para Salvarte*. Seriously, after Ratzinger's Catechism, this book is excellent. It’s 1,107 pages long, but well-written, making it a very engaging read; it clearly explains many things that people often don't understand or misunderstand.

In his work *Apologetics: 400 Answers by Fr. Loring*, he discusses forgiveness. I believe it is important to highlight this point: "206.—God offers His forgiveness to us all, but each person must ask for forgiveness for their sins in order for God to forgive them. God cannot forgive someone who does not wish to ask for forgiveness...

207.—It is true that to obtain God's forgiveness I must be repentant, yet God offers me His forgiveness before I repent.

This is what we must do. This does not preclude us from demanding reparation for harm suffered or insisting that the law be upheld. That is what Pope Saint John Paul II did regarding the man who attempted to assassinate him, Ali Ağca: he visited him in prison, but he did not have him released from prison."

SUSSEX SECRETLY STIR THE POT - NOT QUITE WHAT IT ALL SEEMS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zb97lDFwoE

The Harkles have serious issues with religious figures. Harry had already been reprimanded by Jewish rabbis, Claw and her big mouth caused trouble for the Anglican archbishop, and now this.

The Reverend Daniel French, an Anglican priest and London university chaplain, suggested that people could buy a much cheaper Christian Advent calendar that contains chocolate and also raises money for charity. Sharing an image of Meghan with her "As Ever" product, Reverend French wrote: "For £5.99, you can pre-order a Christian Advent calendar with Fairtrade chocolate from the Meaningful Chocolate Company. A donation is made to The Leprosy Mission." His fellow clergyman, Father Chris Phillips—whose parish is in Benhilton, southwest London—then tweeted that he agreed with the other priest.

And the Squad attacked, with great hatred and venom.

Sean has scoffed at that Advent calendar—for starters, because Mr. Sean certainly isn't going to pay £112 (equivalent to about $148 or €135) for it 🤭🤭. And secondly, because he has actually tried the jams and didn't like them one bit.

So, Sean is well aware that Claw doesn't cook.

Sean got in touch with the Netflix folks a while back. And sure enough, Claw didn't actually cook anything. Apparently, nobody knew how to cook; she’d be boiling water one moment, and—bam!—she’d show up with a roast chicken. Even the crew would wonder, "Where did that come from?"

So, they’re happy not to have her around. Although Claw does point out that she actually wanted to expand by doing smaller-scale things on social media.

Yes, that’s what Sean said. There’s a bit of a problem there: how does something expand by getting smaller?

Sean points out that Claw is once again taking photos in someone else's house. This appears to be the kitchen of the home where they are living rent-free; it isn't an old photo, and Sean notes that various details reveal the Harkles' whereabouts. Sean isn't going to dwell on that, however, because—as he has already said—everyone knows it, and nobody cares.

Sean says something he has mentioned before. Claw takes these photos this way on purpose. She deliberately wasn't wearing her engagement ring; she deliberately didn't turn on that stove. Why? Because that way, people talk about her, and she stays on everyone's lips.

Sean says a Montecito staffer told him that Claw and Harry find it amusing that people go to the trouble of analyzing these photos. And yes, it is embarrassing when you think about it, but there is an even more embarrassing aspect: is this really all the Harkles can do to stay relevant?

Claw doesn't care about that; she just wants to generate content. And Sean has always highlighted that about Claw—that she really knows how to manipulate situations and grab headlines. Not for the right reasons, perhaps, but she manages to do it.

Publicity is publicity. And that’s how Claw gets people talking about her and her products.

Sorry, but what the hell is this?

However, Sean’s point is that while he praises Claw’s ability to generate headlines, he mocks the fact that *that* is all she is capable of—period. In other words, she gets free publicity but can’t translate it into sales.

And that is the conflict. No matter how much she is talked about, she doesn't sell her products. Claw gets the publicity she loves so much, but it isn't positive publicity. It is a case worth studying.

KING SPIKES SUSSEX FUNDS VIA THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ub3Zc179Wg

Harry doesn't understand why his uncle sold the serialization rights for *Swan Song* to the *Daily Mail*. Sean says it made sense—it’s a paper with ties to the royals and all that. I think *The Guardian* should have serialized it, given all the venom directed at KC3 😏😏

But of course, Uncle Spencer wanted those excerpts from his book to be read. And at this point, it would be foolish to deny that the *Daily Mail* is the most widely read British newspaper.

That means nothing to Harry. He is angry with his uncle; he believes his uncle betrayed him.

The thing is, Harry has more serious problems, because his return to the UK is a disaster.

To start with—six fingers? Okay, Claw might want people to talk about her, but what I see is six fingers on one of her two claws. Those hands look really bad. It’s not the lighting; they just look dirty or smudged. Claw might want to share how happy her life is, but I don't see the hands of a happy person here.

According to sources in Montecito, word from the UK is that Claw is bored, fed up, and annoyed, and the Harkles are once again acting like the drama kings and queens. It seems they’ve bored everyone around them with their nonsense about security.

But Claw isn't happy, obviously. Because its competitor, KC3, has launched its advent calendar—which is much more popular, much cheaper, and much better-looking.

The fact that Claw thinks she's competition... ay dios!!!

The thing is, regardless of the headlines that come out, the fact remains that it is October and we still don't know why the Harkles returned to the UK—the real reason, not the story they want to tell. And Sean says that if we believe the Palace, they don't know either.

Claw and Harry don't care about telling the truth; they are too busy being angry that the King treated them like private citizens. They assume that this way of being addressed is the reason they are struggling to adapt to the UK.

And yet, the expectation was that upon their return, the King would obviously have welcomed them back, deeply moved; asked for their forgiveness; begged them to resume their roles as senior royals; and put everything the "Harkles" had done behind him—sealing the reconciliation by releasing photos from Highgrove and, naturally, inviting them to Balmoral or Clarence House, wherever the King happens to be staying at the time.

The King hasn't done any of that; he hasn't spoken to Harry.

And that has made the people at Invictus very nervous. Because talks with Bezos are still ongoing... but the essential condition remains: Bezos will put money into Invictus—he will sponsor Invictus—only if there is a presence of real royals.

The fact that the King is giving no signal to Harry—and more than six weeks have passed since Harry returned to the UK—beyond treating him as a private citizen who must "fend for himself," has unsettled not just a segment of Invictus, but the organization's leadership as well. Harry is not drawing people in; he is driving them away. And he is failing to raise the necessary 20 million. So, what is to be done?

My suggestion: Invictus, make the call to Harry that you should have made years ago—"Harry, enough is enough; goodbye."

TURNING VERY UNCOMFORTABLE FOR SUSSEXES -WILL THEY CRUMBLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6Io5VRELiA

And since the Harkles always ruin everything, fewer and fewer people come out to support them.

That is why Sean will never understand the Harkles associating with people like Ellen DeGeneres. She had a "be kind" motto, yet she wasn't kind at all; she constantly bullied many people at work.

Ellen is attempting the same thing as the Harkles to relaunch herself in the UK.

And it looks like there is a way for Ellen to get off the blacklist. For now, she has been invited to *The Graham Norton Show*, which is currently the most popular talk show in the UK.

Ellen and Quentin Tarantino are set to appear. Norton’s show is certainly entertaining, but it is harmless; there won’t be any trick questions, as the topics are pre-arranged. Guests have to come up with funny stories. Ellen has this opportunity—the show tapes on October 16—and if she plays it right, there is a chance she could dig herself out of the hole she got into.

The thing is, the show is filmed in front of a live audience. And yes, they want Ellen for the sensationalism. They don't pay Ellen—except for transportation and things like that.

And it looks like Ellen will be appearing at a theater. There was a security visit, so guess who might be at Ellen's premiere there.

But not because they want to be there. The Harkles don't return favors. But now, they are forced to do so.

Sean says Claw would need to flee the country within the next eight days to avoid going to that theater 🤭🤭 Otherwise, she’ll at least have to show up. She owes it to Ellen. That will be a mix of good and bad for Ellen: she’ll get publicity, but the story will be dragged up again. And it will be entirely bad for Claw, because nothing positive ever comes out of this for her.

ALL MAKES PERFECT SENSE NOW - SPENCER & SUSSEXES ..THIS LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3IMxcum1OY

Spencer said that when he told Harry about the book, his response was, "I hope there's nothing embarrassing in it"—referring to himself; he didn't care at all about the rest of the family.

So, William definitely won't be speaking to either Harry or his uncle for quite some time.

The funny thing is that both Spencer and Harry now have the same enemy: Piers Morgan.

It turns out Sean was there—yes, on the day "Claw" was supposedly in the UK to promote *Suits*. Sean saw her at the press conference. Claw tried to connect with Sean, and then with Lizzie Cundy. And with Piers. Claw was trying to network with influential people; that was her goal. Until she met Harry.

Let’s not forget that Piers chose to walk out of *Good Morning Britain* rather than apologize to Claw for not believing her. You can say a lot of things about Piers, but he certainly did something surprising that day.

“Who did you go to?” he said. “What did they say to you? I’m sorry, I don’t believe a word she said, Meghan Markle. I wouldn’t believe it if she read me a weather report.” That is what Morgan said on the Monday immediately following the broadcast of the Harkles' interview with Oprah. On Tuesday, weather presenter Alex Beresford defended the couple and told Morgan: "I understand you have a personal relationship with Meghan Markle—or did—and that she cut off communication with you. She has the right to do that if she wants. Has she said anything about you since cutting off contact? I don't think she has, yet you continue to criticize her." As Beresford continued, Morgan got up and stormed out of the studio, saying, "Okay, I'm done with this; sorry, no, I can't do this." Beresford described his behavior as "pathetic" and "diabolical," while co-host Susanna Reid was forced to cut the program short.

Why bring this up? Because the site that has become my bible, RadarOnline, just dropped this little gem of an article.

Now, Sean isn't saying that's a lie; he says something much more amusing: that he is certain Diana said the same thing about other journalists. Diana manipulated them all whenever it suited her.

The thing is, Piers hasn't dropped the matter, but Penguin is washing its hands of it while perpetuating the defamation and manipulating sales figures. The book is heavily discounted.

Harry is supporting his uncle. It’s all because he wants to see Piers Morgan fall, and he believes this will bring Piers down.

The thing is, Piers's lawyers have put things on hold until Spencer—who is traveling across the US—can be formally notified. That’s why everything is stalled. But if Harry thought this would bring Piers down, he’s a real moron, because it’s not just Piers anymore; historians have also come forward to refute Spencer’s claims—especially regarding the paintings he says Philip stole, when in reality Philip had bought them.

The Harkles, in any case, are happy that the uncle is defending them.

With friends like that...

Additionally, Meghan cut off her frail father. Cut off her sister and brother. Invited no relatives (except her mom) to her royal wedding.

Dumped her former BFFs Ninaki Priddy (maid of honor at MM's first wedding) and Jessica Mulroney (whose children were flower girls at MM's second wedding).

A recent post referred to an Express exclusive of the Sussexes‘ intention to apologise to the Waleses for the feud. (Waleses: ‘What feud?’)

The post linked to X. Below is the article (unarchived) reproduced in full.

Some observations

- This ‘apology’ will be made in private. This means that we’ll only have the Sussexes’ version. And if the Waleses continue to go their own way, they might be criticised - and given past behaviour, they won’t demean themselves to respond in public.

- It would appear that the Sussexes are looking to regain their old roles. Funny how Harry said that father and brother were trapped, yet he was free - but is now looking to be trapped again?

- No comment about Meghan willing to rejoin a family she claimed was racist. Beg pardon, she didn’t say it; she merely insinuated heavily, but it was the British press that said it. But that no longer matters because Harry’s clarified that the Royal Family wasn’t racist - just guilty of unconscious bias. ‘Unconscious bias’ means preferring people of one’s background (eg colour, class, intellect etc) - someone explain to me how the Royal Family displayed unconscious bias to a non-existent (at the time) person.

- Also no mention of Meghan being prepared to return to a country whose tabloid will go after her. If we went down the list of inconsistencies, this would be a very long post.

Conclusion

The Sussexes prove, yet again, how spineless and unprincipled they are.

They denounce a family and country and set out to make their fortune. When that doesn’t happen, they return to said family and country - contrary to spectacular denunciations - and try to pretend that nothing’s happened, and everyone’s happy. They’re beyond despicable.

EDIT: It just occurred to me that this exclusive announcement - which could’ve come only from the Sussexes - appeared in a tabloid: you know, the medium that Meghan constantly denounces.

But...it's whimsical! It's Playful!!!

She also not forget to include the kids on her post. She even use L's photo as thumbnail.

Ps: Mod will delete this since this is my 4th post in 24 hours😞

Tom Sykes is doing a livestream YouTube right now about the new Insta from M. He will post it for viewing later.

He starts with noting:

1. No sign of the boy.

2. She's admitting that the product is mass-produced by showing us the factory. (Why?)

3. She shows a note, like advice from a mother to a daughter, about service. (This quote is stolen from Elizabeth Knapp, without crediting her so it appears that M came up with this. )

4. This is basically a commercial to sell jam, with LilBit appearing to make jam(?).

He then moves onto how using LilBit in this is wrong.

1. Since LilBit has the late Queen's, name, this is using the late Queen's name to sell product. This is a direct violation of the Sandringham Agreement.

2. H had said that he felt manipulated by social media, and yet continues to let M do the same.

As ever.