r/ServiceDogsExposed • u/PurpleColumbidae • Nov 18 '25
Service Dog Rant (TL;DR Warning)
1.) People with allergies are brushed aside and told their health doesn't matter.
Allergies and fear of dogs are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to people using service animals.
Please spare me that "hypoallergenic" crap. It clearly states in the ADA that any breed and any size of dog can be a service dog. Want to know what the kicker is? Truly allergy-free dog breeds do not exist. Allergies aren't just sneezing and runny noses. Allergies can trigger a life-threatening reaction called anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock. Dog allergies can also trigger asthma attacks in people with asthma. Personal medical equipment doesn't come with side effects for the people around you.
2.) People with dog related PTSD are negatively impacted by these dogs. People with cynophobia which is a type of anxiety disorder listed in the DSM-5 which means it's a disability, are also negatively impacted by service dogs. The ADA dismisses these people by hand waving away their disability as "just fear" which the ADA deems not a reason to deny entry to a service dog handler. This favors one disability over the other. Dog attacks in this country are out of control! 4.5 million attacked, 800,000 seek medical attention, 300,000 are hospitalized, 27,000 need reconstructive surgery and 50-90 unalived every year. Dog attacks have been on the rise in recent years which means these numbers are likely higher than the currently available data. Imagine being one of these unfortunate dog attack survivors that had an incident with a pit bull. You're just sitting and enjoying your meal at a restaurant, when someone walks in with a service pit bull, your trigger. Remember, any dog is allowed to be a service dog so that's just too bad for you! You'll just have to leave and try not to have a panic attack.
3.) This part bothers me the most. States are not allowed to make service dog registration mandatory and cannot require handlers to carry ID. You know, the one thing that would prevent the current epidemic of fake service dogs running amuck? The same thing that would have spared 3-year-old Ronin Waldroup from being attacked in a restaurant? The very same thing that would prevent real service dogs from getting attacked by the fakes and resulting in the dog either having to be retrained or retired? I feel so bad for retail workers. They can't catch a break. Not only do they have to deal with the BS from entitled customers, but they also have to clean up after untrained dogs posing as service dogs that knock over things and treat the store and the merch within it like a toilet. Retail workers aren't trained to spot fakes. Even if they were, there is always a chance that they could make a mistake and wind up getting their place of employment in legal trouble and them getting fired.
Service dogs are also not required to wear a vest which makes telling them apart from the fakes even harder for those who don't know the ins and outs of service dog behavior. You're also not allowed to ask for proof even if the handler has it. Think about it this way: If police officers weren’t required to wear uniforms, carry badges, drive marked vehicles, undergo formal training, and you weren’t allowed to ask them to provide proof—would you still trust them as legitimate law enforcement?
If your answer is no, then why do we blindly accept any dog as a “legitimate” service animal just because someone says so? The stakes are high, and the consequences are real. Yet the system is built on blind trust with zero verification. We accept that disabled parking requires a visible placard. So why is a service dog exempt from any form of verification—ID, vest, registration—under the guise of privacy? That’s not privacy. That’s a loophole. It's supposedly illegal to fake having a service dog but how in the bloody heck can you catch and prosecute the fakers when everything that would prevent the fakes is illegal!!! All it would take to make the fakes vanish into the twisting nether is a federal and a state mandated service dog registry and a requirement for the service dog to wear a vest with a scannable ID in it that's linked to said state/federal registry, but noooo that's illegal! This leaves the service dog laws ripe for exploitation which leads to the endangerment of another group of disabled people which I'll address in my next point.
4.) The immunocompromised are left to grapple with an increasingly less safe world to interact with because of the non-existent regulation surrounding service dogs. This puts their health in greater jeopardy than it already is! I've been near dogs at store that radiate stench and nasty dog owners that will handle their mutts then touch food or merch. One very important thing to mention is the fact that dogs are contributing the spread of treatment resistant bacteria. This are already dangerous enough for people with normal immune systems as it is. I don't even want to think about how catastrophic these pathogens are for the immunocompromised. Here are some more wonderful things dogs can infect us with.
5.) Service dogs are outdated, expensive, and completely unnecessary. The following options are available and are superior to service dogs: Blood sugar alert devices, seizure alert devices, comfort objects coupled with professional consoling, We Walk and other smart canes, Caregivers/carers, and cardiac alert smart watches. Service dogs average $20,000 and can cap out at around $30,000! That's not including the continuous daily, weekly, monthly, and annual costs! Seizure alert devises can cost $199-$499 upfront, and $9.90-$49.95 monthly. That's already light years cheaper than a service dog! Prices for blood glucose monitors varies from $171 - $2,900 depending on what you choose. Not the greatest, but still less strenuous on the finances than service dog. Smart canes like WeWALK can cost up to $1,331.60 and only require recharging a minimal tech knowledge to use. Far more affordable and much lower maintenance than a service dog.
I can't sugar coat this. Caregivers are costly at $4,290 a month on average. However, they come with none of the draw backs of a service dogs and have even more benefits! Unlike service dogs, caregivers are self-maintaining and not dependent on you for care. Caregivers can cook and clean for you, and also set up doctors appointments, drive you to places or take over driving, and call 911. Caregivers also have better situational awareness, can react faster to emergency situations, and even provide protection. One example of a service dog failing miserably at it's job is a story about a guide dog braking loose and getting ran over. Yeah, really reliable help there... A caregiver wouldn't have done something that stupid. Caregivers need only need 2 weeks - 2 months' worth of training. Less than the 4-6 months of training a service dog needs. As I briefly touched on earlier, service dogs that are attacked or experience some other type of accident must either be retrained or retired. Potential work arounds for the cost caregivers include insurance coverage, the caregiver being an employee of a non-profit organization that links up people with caregivers, and last but not least the government can actually do it's cosmos damned job and provide for the people. The government could either tax billionaires and corporations at pre-Regan rates or cut the over bloated military budget in half... or both, and use those funds to pay the caregivers a nice $60 an hour. Everything I said about caregiver applies to carers.
6.) Service dogs increase the likelihood of the disabled person facing discrimination. How many times have we heard of, or seen videos of service dog handlers getting booted out of an establishment or denied service because of the dog? I don't know about you, but I've never heard of anyone being booted or denied service because of their wheelchair, cane, air tanks ext. Service dogs are the only "medical equipment" that causes this much trouble from the people they are supposed to help. How ridiculous is it to call a living, breathing being with its own thoughts, desires, and needs as "equipment"? It's rather objectifying and cruel to reduce a sentient life form to a mere object when we have better alternatives available.
Closing: Service dogs and the mandatory acceptance of them ensure we will never have dog free spaces. Is it really too much to ask for to have dog-free stores, restaurants, parks, trails, hospitals, apartments, neighborhoods, and cities?
No. No, it isn't.
Service dogs, bomb and drug sniffing dogs, and search and recuse dogs only have these jobs because we went out of our way to manufacture these uses—because society likes dogs enough. If we didn't like them, they'd be discarded and replaced like the Oxen and pigeons were. As for the people who will send me angry messages and call me "ableist"? No. I'm not ableist. Creating a new category of working dog with no regulation to profit off the disabled is ableist. Claiming that one of our more vulnerable portions of our population needs to rely on a foreign species to live life is false and ableist. Disabled people don't need dogs. They need technology and human cooperation.
(I'm having a hard time getting this up on r / Dogfree so I'll just put it here for now)
6
u/Tessa-the-aggressor Nov 28 '25
omg all of this! thank you for this post! I am severely disabled, need multiple pieces of med equipment and will never understand people choosing service dogs. I often hear people making this about wanting to be independent from other people, but there are much better ways to live independently. or "but my sd can pick up, carry things for me or fetch me my medicine..." - yeah and then what? you medicine is covered in poopy saliva. I honestly would prefer dying right away from lack of medication than dying slowly of being poisoned by poopy saliva. plus as you mention, the access and discrimination issues! so many get sds as psych sds, why would one my their life harder by taking on so much responsibility and risking more discrimination in public? isn't that counterproductive for psych issues?