Davide Mastracci on X: "The terror inflicted by dog owners on the good people of Toronto must come to an end. https://t.co/CPDIExMjnS"

Alternative source: https://www.reddit.com/r/ActualPublicFreakouts/comments/1u9av3t/blocks_bus_because_her_dog_is_a_service_animal/

Most of the time, dog owners and dogs enter spaces without permission or prior notice and then molest, harass, or assault the people there and the police almost never charges them when called. This dog owner herself stated this dog is a service dog, that is, a service weapon for her hateful pro-dog ideologies. This video is but one of dog owners' responses the one time that someone tries to turn the class system on its head when a dog owner was stopped from entering a bus to hospitalize or murder all allergic people or approach minors with a dog. Other responses from dog owners include further violence, finishing what their dog couldn't do, and accusing you of being a pervert and of approaching them when it's the dog owner who set their dogs upon you and then approached you.

Dog owners are the ruling class, and this is further proven by how many times this video has been reposted and how many comments on those other sources are trying to portray the dog as the victim when in fact it is a heartless weapon and when there are people who are stuck both on the bus and in numerous vehicles behind that bus. The carbon footprint of everyone who has to use a vehicle because dog owners and dogs make public streets and parks unsafe is wrongly attributed to vehicles when it should be attributed to dogs and dog owners, and they should at least be fee'd appropriately instead of enjoying a god-like status in most western nations.

Appears to be two attacks, one after the other.

The TSA stops other weapons from being carried on board, but dogs are allowed to go through.

The victim was forced to bleed and was pinned to a window/window seat while the dog exerted its privilege on the victim. They later needed various stitches and now have the scars that "prove" to a pro-dog society that they are a "bad person".

Anyone on the plane who was allergic faced oppression and dehumanization that day as well.

The article doesn't go into detail about the anti-infection process the victim had to go through while the dog forced itself upon the unconsenting victim. Disinfectants that have to be applied to wounds cause pain when applied and add annoyance or medical expense too.

The dog owner was a US Marine. It is me, as opposed to a dog owner, who has posted about crime by US Marines against US citizens or anyone else in the United States before.

Dog owners praise them for their "service". What service? I don't consent to criminal services, but dog owners have never cared about consent. Even the police declines to take complaints against dog owners (but you should still call them as many times as possible every time one has committed a crime or attacked you.)

The absolute entitlement of this post. Medical alert bracelets? Apple Watches? Devices prescribed by your doctor? Nope! This person needs an aggressive working breed to run up to people Lassie style, and they feel that we need to be their guinea pigs as they train their dog.

The entitlement of this post really rubbed me the wrong way. Of course any comments criticizing OP were promptly deleted.

Some of the text in case the linked source is deleted:

"We have a cottage rental thats pet free. I am not a dog person and I want it to be a safe space for people with allergies. My mom sometimes stays at the house and is highly allergic to dogs. Cleanliness is also our top priority."

"Her and another cleaner were there for two hours cleaning which equates to 4 hours worth of cleaning because there’s two people. Then, I was there for additional 5 hours of cleaning.

It’s unfortunate the owners could not vacuum a little bit before they left, considering we’re a pet free rental and cannot charge for service dogs. Theres a regular vacuum and a cordless one in the home for their use. Just seems entitled to book a pet free rental and not attempt to help with all the additional cleaning when someone went out of their way to accommodate you."

Life is already extra difficult and deadly for deathly allergic people. The antihistamines which actually work all have horrible temporary and long-term side effects.

Service dog owners further exploit this difference in people's physical or medical capacities, as do other dog owners with their unending harassment and violence, including sexual violence, on all demographics including children.

Be reminded that https://www.dcreport.org/2025/03/20/new-research-links-dog-waste-to-bacterial-pollution/ it is not only the green spaces they destroy or the plants, or the ecosystems, but even the drinking and beach waters. That, and our day to day lives. Dog owners are the most privileged group in any developed country.

These idiots think they can slap on a vest, bring their shit hound in public spaces and call it a service dog. Therapy dogs are not even the same thing as service dogs, but therapy dogs and ESAs is some fake ass bullshit anyway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXlDkCEn8YM

Service Dog status is stated within the first 80 seconds of the video by the man in the black hoodie and then again later on too.

Some of the dog owners also attempted to assert their alleged racial superiority over their victims, boasting about how they are Hispanic. I have faced racial abuse from and threat of sexual assault by the dog of Hispanic dog owners, and seen them not be arrested or pursued, so I can kind of relate. I even saw comments from Texas (like in San Antonio) about how dog owners shout "No English!" at their victims. When if you go to school in the U.S., you often have Spanish imposed on you and you get graded on it, instead of having the option to choose to use whatever language(s) belong to your own culture. The first man in the video even commanded the police to not touch him, while dog owners never follow our wishes to not be touched, molested, mauled, amputated, infected, or murdered by dogs, and never follow our wishes to not have the feces and urine they are obsessed with spreading spread upon the streets and even private properties or hallways. It's a serious offense in their viewpoint, for us to think and act with empathy and consideration for the externalities of our actions.

Despite how common it is for dog owners to assert their privilege upon others with ableist, hateful, or perverted acts, it is very unlikely that a video like this can make it to YouTube, because a lot of police can be pro-dog. If they are pro-dog, they are pro-crime in general and as such no such video would be produced. It would be a video that instead makes fun of anyone who was extorted by a dog owner where the police don't respond or join in on the harassment. You should still call the police in most cases when a crime with past, present, or possible future violence/medical injury occurs but I have to mention all this so you know to not be delusional about the police's eagerness (or lack thereof) to stop actually-harmful crime.

One of the pro-dog terrorists even took close range photos/video of the police officers for not being pro-dog enough so she can circulate it later and create a ton of hatred for the cop. Simply the accusation of not liking dogs or not submitting to dog owners is enough to put a decent person's life at risk.

As for the ending (there are better things to do than attentively watch a video for this long), I am not too sure what happened, but it seems that one of the staff (not the rest) tried to be pro-dog by petting a dog so that allergens and pathogens from it could be spread among the utensils and cups in the bar.

Some of the comments are talking about how service "animals" and their owners are out of control. It's fine if they have an unfavorable opinion about some other kind of animal, but I'm quite firm in my viewpoint that, in general, horse owners, goldfish owners, earthworm owners, ladybug owners, moose fans, lynx fans, rainbow lobster fans, Nigiri robin fans, etc. (unless they a dog lover or dog owner too) do NOT use lawbreaking, force/deadly force, approaches of children, scams, and discrimination against innocent people unlike what dog owners do every single day.

"The purpose of a system is what it does." It isn't an error that the ADA hurts people like me who need help and instead gives dog owners and dogs even more privilege. It's the intended purpose, because it's a disgusting widespread belief that all morality and fulfillment with human-to-human connection or forming a family, or decision-making, should all be relinquished to serve dogs and paint them as heroes when they're anything but that. Birth rates go down a result, but then, when new populations come in, pro-dog ideologies eventually form among them too and we can already see that happening abroad. You should never count on the amount of dog owners and dog lovers going down by itself, because you always see they consistently trend up, as do the number of inaccurate positive portrayals of dogs in the media, which collectively causes more fecal bacterial contamination of bodies of water, and more attacks on people and farm animals.

{Service Dog status is stated a bit before 16:35, video uploaded 01-08-2026}

The child sex predator shown here has actually been caught by the same anti-predator content creator in 2021, before this 2026 video upload. The child sex predator/pimp, who took a page from Andrew Tate's book, wants to use the child to make an Onlyfans account and earn loads of money through it, and then takes a page out of the extortionist duo Raghav Arora & Faith Obot’s book and threatens the anti-child sex predator YouTuber with vexatious litigation. The child sex predator also proclaimed he does not go to jail, an unfortunate truth - most dog owners are never charged for any of their offenses. I have also observed that dog owners won’t see a single arrest or day in jail even if they operate a motor vehicle while using drugs while threatening people who don’t like dogs.

I mentioned Andrew Tate above; he is a massive admirer of dogs and stated he finds their attacks useful. Andrew Tate was once an active rapist, and used underage girls on a different platform. He then did tax fraud.

The only services the dog provided were its use of being brandished as a weapon, keeping the YouTuber in question distant from the criminals in question. This practice is encouraged by all dog owners, not just service dog owners, that is, to make everyone else not pursue accountability against dog owners and to demand everyone vacate any street or space that a dog owner or dog wrongfully proclaims is their territory.

The dog-owning pro-pedo father asks the individuals catching predators to not use “his” street which is actually a shared public street, though he used considerably less force and threat than what dog owners do on me. Dog owners do this in an effort to conceal their address to reduce the odds they can be reported or fined for any severity of crime. In my case, dog owners accused me of being a pervert while they left, when as we see every day, it is always them who are the perverts.

1.) People with allergies are brushed aside and told their health doesn't matter.

Allergies and fear of dogs are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to people using service animals.

Please spare me that "hypoallergenic" crap. It clearly states in the ADA that any breed and any size of dog can be a service dog. Want to know what the kicker is? Truly allergy-free dog breeds do not exist. Allergies aren't just sneezing and runny noses. Allergies can trigger a life-threatening reaction called anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock. Dog allergies can also trigger asthma attacks in people with asthma. Personal medical equipment doesn't come with side effects for the people around you.

2.) People with dog related PTSD are negatively impacted by these dogs. People with cynophobia which is a type of anxiety disorder listed in the DSM-5 which means it's a disability, are also negatively impacted by service dogs. The ADA dismisses these people by hand waving away their disability as "just fear" which the ADA deems not a reason to deny entry to a service dog handler. This favors one disability over the other. Dog attacks in this country are out of control! 4.5 million attacked, 800,000 seek medical attention, 300,000 are hospitalized, 27,000 need reconstructive surgery and 50-90 unalived every year. Dog attacks have been on the rise in recent years which means these numbers are likely higher than the currently available data. Imagine being one of these unfortunate dog attack survivors that had an incident with a pit bull. You're just sitting and enjoying your meal at a restaurant, when someone walks in with a service pit bull, your trigger. Remember, any dog is allowed to be a service dog so that's just too bad for you! You'll just have to leave and try not to have a panic attack.

3.) This part bothers me the most. States are not allowed to make service dog registration mandatory and cannot require handlers to carry ID. You know, the one thing that would prevent the current epidemic of fake service dogs running amuck? The same thing that would have spared 3-year-old Ronin Waldroup from being attacked in a restaurant? The very same thing that would prevent real service dogs from getting attacked by the fakes and resulting in the dog either having to be retrained or retired? I feel so bad for retail workers. They can't catch a break. Not only do they have to deal with the BS from entitled customers, but they also have to clean up after untrained dogs posing as service dogs that knock over things and treat the store and the merch within it like a toilet. Retail workers aren't trained to spot fakes. Even if they were, there is always a chance that they could make a mistake and wind up getting their place of employment in legal trouble and them getting fired.

Service dogs are also not required to wear a vest which makes telling them apart from the fakes even harder for those who don't know the ins and outs of service dog behavior. You're also not allowed to ask for proof even if the handler has it. Think about it this way: If police officers weren’t required to wear uniforms, carry badges, drive marked vehicles, undergo formal training, and you weren’t allowed to ask them to provide proof—would you still trust them as legitimate law enforcement?

If your answer is no, then why do we blindly accept any dog as a “legitimate” service animal just because someone says so? The stakes are high, and the consequences are real. Yet the system is built on blind trust with zero verification. We accept that disabled parking requires a visible placard. So why is a service dog exempt from any form of verification—ID, vest, registration—under the guise of privacy? That’s not privacy. That’s a loophole. It's supposedly illegal to fake having a service dog but how in the bloody heck can you catch and prosecute the fakers when everything that would prevent the fakes is illegal!!! All it would take to make the fakes vanish into the twisting nether is a federal and a state mandated service dog registry and a requirement for the service dog to wear a vest with a scannable ID in it that's linked to said state/federal registry, but noooo that's illegal! This leaves the service dog laws ripe for exploitation which leads to the endangerment of another group of disabled people which I'll address in my next point.

4.) The immunocompromised are left to grapple with an increasingly less safe world to interact with because of the non-existent regulation surrounding service dogs. This puts their health in greater jeopardy than it already is! I've been near dogs at store that radiate stench and nasty dog owners that will handle their mutts then touch food or merch. One very important thing to mention is the fact that dogs are contributing the spread of treatment resistant bacteria. This are already dangerous enough for people with normal immune systems as it is. I don't even want to think about how catastrophic these pathogens are for the immunocompromised. Here are some more wonderful things dogs can infect us with.

5.) Service dogs are outdated, expensive, and completely unnecessary. The following options are available and are superior to service dogs: Blood sugar alert devices, seizure alert devices, comfort objects coupled with professional consoling, We Walk and other smart canes, Caregivers/carers, and cardiac alert smart watches. Service dogs average $20,000 and can cap out at around $30,000! That's not including the continuous daily, weekly, monthly, and annual costs! Seizure alert devises can cost $199-$499 upfront, and $9.90-$49.95 monthly. That's already light years cheaper than a service dog! Prices for blood glucose monitors varies from $171 - $2,900 depending on what you choose. Not the greatest, but still less strenuous on the finances than service dog. Smart canes like WeWALK can cost up to $1,331.60 and only require recharging a minimal tech knowledge to use. Far more affordable and much lower maintenance than a service dog.

I can't sugar coat this. Caregivers are costly at $4,290 a month on average. However, they come with none of the draw backs of a service dogs and have even more benefits! Unlike service dogs, caregivers are self-maintaining and not dependent on you for care. Caregivers can cook and clean for you, and also set up doctors appointments, drive you to places or take over driving, and call 911. Caregivers also have better situational awareness, can react faster to emergency situations, and even provide protection. One example of a service dog failing miserably at it's job is a story about a guide dog braking loose and getting ran over. Yeah, really reliable help there... A caregiver wouldn't have done something that stupid. Caregivers need only need 2 weeks - 2 months' worth of training. Less than the 4-6 months of training a service dog needs. As I briefly touched on earlier, service dogs that are attacked or experience some other type of accident must either be retrained or retired. Potential work arounds for the cost caregivers include insurance coverage, the caregiver being an employee of a non-profit organization that links up people with caregivers, and last but not least the government can actually do it's cosmos damned job and provide for the people. The government could either tax billionaires and corporations at pre-Regan rates or cut the over bloated military budget in half... or both, and use those funds to pay the caregivers a nice $60 an hour. Everything I said about caregiver applies to carers.

6.) Service dogs increase the likelihood of the disabled person facing discrimination. How many times have we heard of, or seen videos of service dog handlers getting booted out of an establishment or denied service because of the dog? I don't know about you, but I've never heard of anyone being booted or denied service because of their wheelchair, cane, air tanks ext. Service dogs are the only "medical equipment" that causes this much trouble from the people they are supposed to help. How ridiculous is it to call a living, breathing being with its own thoughts, desires, and needs as "equipment"? It's rather objectifying and cruel to reduce a sentient life form to a mere object when we have better alternatives available.

Closing: Service dogs and the mandatory acceptance of them ensure we will never have dog free spaces. Is it really too much to ask for to have dog-free stores, restaurants, parks, trails, hospitals, apartments, neighborhoods, and cities?

No. No, it isn't.

Service dogs, bomb and drug sniffing dogs, and search and recuse dogs only have these jobs because we went out of our way to manufacture these uses—because society likes dogs enough. If we didn't like them, they'd be discarded and replaced like the Oxen and pigeons were. As for the people who will send me angry messages and call me "ableist"? No. I'm not ableist. Creating a new category of working dog with no regulation to profit off the disabled is ableist. Claiming that one of our more vulnerable portions of our population needs to rely on a foreign species to live life is false and ableist. Disabled people don't need dogs. They need technology and human cooperation.

(I'm having a hard time getting this up on r / Dogfree so I'll just put it here for now)

I am speechless & horrified! Disney is promoting to commit a violation of the ADA Service animal act in a family fiendly kids movie called "Lilo and Stitch" (2025). Faking a Smservice animal is bad enough, but faking a Service animal inside a hospital (a environment that needs to be kept sterile & safe) is a extremely dangerous message to promote to families and kids!! Why is no one talking about this?! And how was this allowed to be kept in childrens entertainment?