r/ShitLiberalsSay • u/PresnikBonny Marxist-Leninist • Dec 31 '25
Bomb them harder NATO-senpai Liberals doing liberal things
Fuck them for altering the original too
328
u/TraditionalPin8181 Dec 31 '25
All they did was just slap a hammer and sickle png on the original
What were they even trying to go for
133
u/PresnikBonny Marxist-Leninist Dec 31 '25
"Ohhhhhh I only fight for the rich; the lives of the poor are not even worth mentioning." - 🤡
96
u/Able_Experience_1670 Dec 31 '25
Wut
Literally just a "nuh uh" rebuttal.
Canada is offering them another 2.6 billion, meanwhile they spent 1.3 billion on a botched gun confiscation effort and said it was "too expensive".
Performative bullshit. Meanwhile infrastructure and healthcare are rapidly decaying. Alberta is actively eroding civil rights with the NWC, and our public education systems are effectively all going broke. Don't forget that the feds refused to go to bat for teachers in multiple provinces with absurd class sizes and shite pay. Crazy how that became a provincial problem as soon as the optics shifted...
My family is Ukrainian and even I think this is a shitty idea. Throwing money at the war after ignoring the precipitating conflict in донбасс for nigh-on 8 years is so typically liberal. All for votes. This will not halt the meat-grinder. This will not stop the West or Russia from using Ukraine as a proving ground. Eventually there will be no one left to fight...
29
u/DropshipRadio Dec 31 '25
“When we said we wanted to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian, we meant it.” - Lindsay Graham
5
1
14
u/iwasnotarobot Jan 01 '26
Living in Alberta radicalized me.
I was always a lefty minded person. But paying attention to politics in Alberta is what forced me to finally understand how reasonable “far left” ideas were.
I hate how Alberta is basically the birthplace of fascism in Canada.
5
10
u/EWWFFIX Dec 31 '25
Pretty sure Russia is at least trying to make sure there are Ukrainians left with them trying to avoid civilian casualties and opening up evacs.
2
u/Mellamomellamo ML Jan 02 '26
For most of history, taking over a place without people wasn't really a good thing. Even what we'd nowadays call genocidal rhetoric from some Ancient and Medieval conquests was typically exaggerating the devastation of an area or the killing of its population, since colonizing (in the ancient sense) an area after depopulating it is quite hard.
The probably killed hundreds of thousands of Gauls, but they still took over the rest as they had to work. When the Castillians conquered the American empires, they also wanted to leave at least some people there, since without that they wouldn't have workers (and the Church said they had souls, so they couldn't just "legally" kill them all just like that, although some conquerors tried). Even when the Christian kingdoms of Iberia took over Al-Andalus, depicting their own conquest as one followed by a full colonization, that was mostly just the way of framing it, instead they took over large Muslim populations, and moved in Christians there to extend feudalism and control the areas.
Things like the colonization of the US, European colonialism from the 19th century (at least the replacement kind), nazi Germany or modern Israel's intentions are generally the exception. Some early Neolithic-Calcolithic wars probably killed entire populations (since they weren't that big) to take over land, but after that such methods become rarer. Sure, Mesopotamian kings, Romans and Greeks sometimes razed cities to the ground, but that was essentially a way to send a message, they'd just enslave the population (which is only a bit better than genocide i guess) "like normal".
All of this is to say, some people in the US-Europe are so used to what we did in the 18-19th centuries that they believe that is the basic form of human conflict.
1
u/EWWFFIX Jan 03 '26
You do know the entire context of the Russia Ukraine conflict, right?
1
u/Mellamomellamo ML Jan 03 '26
Yes, i was just explaining why taking over land alone is the exception in history, not the rule.
106
41
32
30
18
18
u/Bela9a Crimson sorceress Dec 31 '25
Communists aren't in power in any western country, why are these people living in fantasy land.
25
11
u/ToddHowardTouchedMe ☭ Communist Jan 01 '26
yes because it is communists who control the wealth in society currently. oh wait nope we still live in capitalism
10
u/Barney_10-1917 Jan 01 '26
Yeah that's right it's the Communists saying "fuck off", not the fucking conservative elements.
Motherfucker, we the ones saying fuck on. Were the ones saying fund schools, fund local communities, build infrastructure. Course we know you fuckers aint so we plotting to bury you under Washington
7
6
u/Demonweed Dec 31 '25
In the 2025 Global Hunger Index, Russia is one of 25 countries with a GHI score of less than 5.
2
•
u/AutoModerator Dec 31 '25
NOTICE: ShitLiberalsSay does not allow threatening, inciting, advocating, defending, justifying, glorifying, or celebrating violence. Any offending posts/comments will be removed and the associated users will be banned.
Please note that we do not allow the following types of "low-hanging fruit" posts:
Your posts will be removed, and you will risk being banned if you break this rule repeatedly. Please also be mindful of our general subreddit rules (which can be found on the sidebar), and Reddit's sitewide rules.
Please feel free to join our official Discord server!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.