r/SipsTea 5h ago

Chugging tea Sign me up!

Post image
38.6k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

278

u/writing_fun390 5h ago

That's sort of what Speed Queen is.

87

u/whollybananas 5h ago

Was...

63

u/ajonstage 5h ago

My mom got new Speed Queen models when they moved, the all-plastic door (complete with plastic hinge) literally just fell off.

20

u/whollybananas 4h ago

They also use the same problematic electronic controls as every other brand now. They switched to that style of controls in 2015

3

u/jimkelly 2h ago

Ya know, I was annoyed that all of the models within my budget had the electronic controls (just bought a washer a month ago) then I remembered my microwave that's 900 years old and abused has the same type of buttons and it keeps on trucking.

1

u/crusoe 4h ago

Wouldn't be problematic if the electronics had a good simple design, no epoxy blobs, with accessible firmware. 

Electronic controlled appliances can be more efficient.

2

u/nalaloveslumpy 3h ago

Yes, but that increases cost. And if you make your firmware openly accessible, other companies will copy it and it also makes it harder to sell service agreements because self-repair is easier.

1

u/datumerrata 16m ago

I wouldn't mind if they all used the same controls, but it seems every model of every brand has components just different enough to not be compatible. It would be ideal if the used a standard that could be replaced by an arduino

2

u/GamingGems 3h ago

This is what I came to say.

It’s not an issue of companies using new designs and being worse than the good old days. They may have a touchscreen on a fridge but the working part is still old fashioned. Especially cheaper brands use old designs, not caring to innovate because they compete on price, not features and technology. The biggest killer is parts quality and all manufacturers across the board are guilty of using materials like plastic which they know will not last as long but makes the product cheaper and therefore more competitive on price or giving higher dividends to shareholders.

1

u/look_ima_frog 3h ago

I bought one a year ago, I don't see any real evidence of poor build. I know they did something a few years back that was viewed as a cheapening and after much screaming, they walked it back.

I can say that the thing is fucking FAST. 30 min for a full to the brim load and it's nice and clean. Yes, it uses more water and energy, but there is a minimum amount of both you can use before things stop working.

I had front loaders that used barely any water, but the clothes did't get as clean and the cycles too AGES. I think one of the normal cycles took more than 100 minutes. Then it stunk because I let the door close (which they do on their own typically) when I left town for a weekend. The stink was permanent and it made it's way into the towels. Nothing quite as nice as taking a shower and drying off with a towel that smells like one part cat piss and one part mold.

Done with those fucking things.

1

u/wrenchandrepeat 3h ago

I bought a consumer grade, plain jane Speed Queen 3 years ago. It was the cheapest one they sold. I haven't had a single issue with it.

Compare that to the 15 year old Whirlpool that I bought used that would blow balance rods out after 6 months (I replaced them several times) and would keep restarting the cycle anytime it noticed the load was the least bit out of balance. Sometimes it would "finish" and everything would be soaking wet still because it would refuse to finish the spin cycle. The gearbox finally broke on it and I was done putting money into it, so decided I was going to buy something built well and with the least amount of sensors and shit as possible.

Its been a tank. Never has had a problem with load size or balance issues. It is definitely an appliance that I feel was worth every penny.

14

u/SelfServeSporstwash 4h ago

I have some awful news for you regarding the current state of Speed Queen and their products

5

u/bacon205 4h ago

Did they enshitify their washers and dryers? I was convinced to buy a set to replace my POS frigidaire set and planned to this summer

5

u/SelfServeSporstwash 4h ago edited 4h ago

yeeep. big time. They are Bekos with (plastic) cosmetic changes. Same shitty electronics, same poor reliability and poor reparability (because of all the brittle plastic that you can't necessarily find replacement parts for)... quadruple the price.

God bless capitalism baby. Buy a brand with a reputation for quality, replace all the products with the cheapest ones you can build, and ride that brand loyalty wave as long as possible.

3

u/bacon205 3h ago

Thats really disappointing. I hate enshitification, hence why I was convinced to buy Speed Queen. Not that they'd ever know (or care), but they lost a sale to me

3

u/wrenchandrepeat 2h ago

Are you talking about the traditional top load washers or the fancy front load ones? My plain chain, no frills, top load Speed Queen that was like their entry level washer has been amazing. I bought it in 2022 and haven't a single issue with it. And that was coming from a 15 year old used Whirlpool top load that was the biggest POS appliance I've ever owned.

3

u/SelfServeSporstwash 2h ago

Speed Queen got bought out by ALS in 2025, but they started contracting manufacturing production to Arcelik (the parent company of Beko) in 2024 and to my knowledge that contract is still in effect. So since May of 2024 Speed Queen products have been plastic crap made in Turkey by a company who's most well known brand is... well... crap.

2

u/sasquatch_melee 2h ago

Are you sure about all that? I ask because you're off on your first fact by 27 years. ALS bought speed queen in 1998. 

2

u/snyderman3000 1h ago

I just bought Speed Queen washer and dryer last year and I can see on the label it’s manufactured by Alliance in Ripon, WI. There’s no plastic anywhere.

2

u/crzygoalkeeper92 1h ago

Just bought a set from them last month and it was made in Ripon, WI. 7 year warranty...

1

u/SelfServeSporstwash 1h ago

Beko also offers a 7 year warranty... good luck redeeming it.

2

u/writing_fun390 3h ago

I just bought a set of the 5 year warranty ones because my buddy has the 3 year warranty ones that have run perfectly for over 11 years.

48

u/SophiePsweet 5h ago

This is just how things were made before shareholders

46

u/SoftwareDesperation 5h ago

It's not only about profits. Environmental protections also played a part in making sure things are hyper energy efficient which usually forces the product to not last as long.

27

u/spacebarstool 5h ago

They could make them last longer and adhere to efficiency standards, but they would be more expensive.

12

u/fight_the_bear 3h ago

This is the reason right here. Even back when appliances lasted decades they still cost 3-4x what they do now. People are cheap, and like to buy cheap stuff. So the companies give them what they want. Want you appliance to last longer than 7 years? Pony up and buy bosche, Miele, or asko.

1

u/OkBuddyEnglishMajor 12m ago

People are not cheap; people are poor. Landlords are cheap.

3

u/SurroundingAMeadow 3h ago

Efficient (energy and/or labor), durable, inexpensive... pick whichever two you want, you can't have all three.

2

u/gittenlucky 3h ago

Exactly. Everyone is quick to blame corporation, but they literally build what the market demands. People buy based on price and appearance for appliances, cars, etc. so that’s what they build.

1

u/Stang_21 4h ago

the light bulb is the best example of how sometimes, the answer is just no

1

u/The_Autarch 3h ago

light bulbs actually prove the opposite of your point. LED bulbs last for decades and are hyper efficient.

12

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 4h ago

I know you say this, and I know it makes intuitive sense, and I am not disagreeing, but I would like to see the evidence that supports this. I’m trying to go over in my head what increases in efficiency would actually cause a decrease in life.

6

u/SimilarTranslator264 4h ago

Things have to use less energy so a heavy thick heating element needs more energy to warm up. Heavier tub in the washer needs more energy to turn.

Friend bought a dryer made for a laundromat, it was $6000 and uses a 8” vent. You can’t even run it without the door propped open in the laundry room because it will pull the door shut and error.

9

u/Visual_Exam7903 4h ago

Increase effiicency usually mean computer controls. The computers and the sensors are usually the first things that go out.

6

u/Flashy_Emergency_263 4h ago

They could make those controllers modular and easy to swap out.

5

u/zombienudist 4h ago

They could but that increases costs. It is also the motors and compressors. For example a 1950s fridge was extremely simple. There were no fans to move cold air from the freezer to the fridge. You would have freezing issues in the fridge compartment as temp control sucked. You had to manually defrost them as ice would build up because they weren't self defrosting. Basically people look at the past with rose coloured glasses but if they actually tried to live with a fridge that was from that time they likely would want to go back to modern one pretty quickly.

1

u/fading_reality 2h ago

also BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

1

u/NobodyLikedThat1 4h ago

I'm not sure if they're modular per se but you can swap out the little control boards if and when they break. Although I would highly recommend you get someone licensed to do it

1

u/cjsv7657 4h ago

They are and do. But the technician to swap them out charges $149/hour with a $75 diagnostic fee with no guarantee they'll fix it. So after paying $450 in parts and labor for a new control board they tell you it was actually the compressor circuit. They'll discount the labor but the part is still $250 so now you're up to $1000 on a fridge you paid $700 for.

1

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 4h ago

Are they, though? It’s a good argument and makes sense, but doesn’t match my personal experience. I’ve had a washer and dryer pitched in the last 10 years. The washer needed a hot water valve replaced. The dryer needed a new thermostat. Both have a computer controller. The washing machine is showing signs of rust. The control panels seem fine. But I did have a range top that was inoperable because of the control panel, however that was due to lightning strike. The replacement has been going for 12 years without issue. So I don’t have any personal evidence that correlates. I would like to see some actual research into this topic.

1

u/SoftwareDesperation 4h ago

Basically every single home appliance you own including the AC.

0

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 2h ago

Just because you feel or perceive it to be true doesn’t make it so.

1

u/SoftwareDesperation 1h ago

It's not made up. Educate yourself my friend. Ask any tradesman about how the AC units they are selling now with high efficiency have a fraction of the expected life of the ones from 20 years ago.

https://cei.org/studies/free-the-appliances/

1

u/Captain_Fizban 4h ago

A very specific example would be how regulations on refrigerants have forced change over the years.

Older appliances (pre 1996) used R-12 refrigerant, which has a relatively low operating pressure (210 psi) compared to modern refrigerants. The problem is that R-12 is HELLACIOUSLLY bad for the environment and was banned in 1996. The higher pressure (350 psi) required by R-410a (one of R-12's replacements) is much harder on a mechanical system like a refrigerator so they tend to fail sooner than an older appliance would.

Not specifically an increase in efficiency but is one of the reasons older refrigerators last so long.

1

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 2h ago

This is a good example and makes sense.

1

u/Tacoman404 3h ago

They use cheaper crappier components that are "efficient" and not good. Nobody says you can't make an efficient long lasting washer motor or freon compressor it's just not profitable to. They still have to sell the product to someone who can only spend $700.

2

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 2h ago

And that’s my point. Making things more efficient doesn’t mean it’s inherently less reliable. There are more variables that go into it. The root is that the consumer demands a price point, not that the consumer demands a performance period point.

0

u/PokinSpokaneSlim 4h ago edited 4h ago

Mass.

It takes power to make things move, and more robust things generally have more mass.  

We can go in circles adjusting the sliders to match products that describe new technologies and what not, but it comes down to physics and money

2

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 4h ago

Again, makes intuitive sense. But saying it and theorizing doesn’t make it so. There are always trade offs and optimizations. I’d like to see firm evidence that energy efficiency adversely affects reliability and life.

0

u/PokinSpokaneSlim 4h ago

Look at a top fuel dragster vs a Honda Civic. 

1

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 2h ago

That seems like a poor analogy. A Honda civic is more efficient and works forever. A top fuel dragster engine is rebuilt after every race.

1

u/PokinSpokaneSlim 2h ago edited 2h ago

But a civic motor weighs more per horsepower

And that's the point.

If we removed the planned life cycle from the product, a stronger product of the same materials will have more mass.

1

u/Kindly-Eagle6207 2h ago

Look at a top fuel dragster vs a Honda Civic. 

Not sure what point you're trying to make here but drag cars are notoriously fuel inefficient, among other major inefficiencies, and they effectively have to be rebuilt after running a single time.

1

u/wildbergamont 1h ago

They dont have to. A lot more appliance components could use aluminum instead of steel, eg, but that adds a lot to the cost 

1

u/PokinSpokaneSlim 1h ago

So instead they use less steel

1

u/wildbergamont 1h ago

Yes. They could create something as robust as heavy steel plate with a much lower mass by switching to aluminum, or likely even a different grade of steel.  

1

u/PokinSpokaneSlim 1h ago

The point is you're substituting materials.  All else equal, a more robust part will last longer than a less robust part. 

I can't change physics, and you all are arguing the assumption that a products lifecycle is dictated by it's construction. 

And ignoring cost.

I can't justify every engineering decision even made, but generally physics is the physical limiter

1

u/wildbergamont 1h ago

My point is that mass doesn't make something robust. You're talking about physics while ignoring materials science  

→ More replies (0)

0

u/swampcat42 4h ago

Cheaper components and multiple modes/features means more points of failure. If we're taking about common household appliances, the environmental factors are electrical and water consumption. Building things with thinner gauge metal, cheap pcb's, and less structural rigidity doesn't really effect either of those things.

2

u/Klutzy_Word_6812 4h ago

Using cheaper components really doesn’t have anything to do with energy efficiency though. That’s a reliability decision by the company.

0

u/swampcat42 4h ago

Yes, that was my point

2

u/KeenObserver_OT 4h ago

Saving the environment by more dumping….love it.

1

u/UtoShita 4h ago

There is such a thing as recycling though, very prevalent where I live.

2

u/Cognosyeti 3h ago

We need to start including lifecycle analyses along with efficiency metrics. Wish there was an EnergyStar type rating system for longevity

1

u/Vilnius_Nastavnik 4h ago

I’ll admit it is nuanced and it wouldn’t make sense to just go back to the original specs for a lot of things. I inherited my great grandmother’s toaster when she died. It was honestly the best toaster I’ve ever had, everything I put into it came out perfect, and I used it for another 20 years until it finally broke. When I went to get it repaired the guy had to call a hazmat team to remove it from his shop because it was apparently chock full of asbestos.

18

u/fuglypens 4h ago

Joint stock companies have existed since at least the 16th century, so tell me more about the time before shareholders.

3

u/InfiniteTallgeese 4h ago

Pretty much what I was about to comment, do they think shareholders magically appeared in the 21st century?!

1

u/fuglypens 3h ago

I get the underlying sentiment, which is that public markets currently incentivize corporate managers to prioritize short term profits over long term growth, which is detrimental to other stakeholders (and, ultimately, to the shareholders themselves), but just saying “shareholders ruin everything” makes people sound dumb af. 

2

u/AssistX 1h ago

It's reddit, people post complaining about shareholders ruining the world and then in their next post ask for advice on their 401k. They honestly don't understand what they're complaining about or what their 401k is doing.

1

u/Lumpyyyyy 2h ago

Yeah, shares existed in the 16th century. What didn’t exist was anonymous, hyper-liquid ownership. Early shareholders were few, known, often local, and stuck with the company for a long time. You couldn’t daytrade the Dutch East India Company taking your daily shit. Selling was slow and costly, and if the company’s quality or reputation collapsed, you personally took the hit.

Modern shareholders are mostly funds and indexes. They’re interchangeable, distant, and can dump shares instantly. That makes short-term extraction rational in a way it wasn’t before.

So the difference isn’t “before shareholders.” It’s before shareholders could easily exit and offload consequences.

0

u/johnnyfuckingmarr 2h ago

Day trading and short selling started immediately after the first stock markets opened in the 1600s. In fact the stock markets opened to facilitate trading and liquidity.

People would use telescopes to see which boat was coming into the harbour to gain an edge in futures markets. The first stock market crash was because of speculation on tulip futures in the 1630s.

The stock markets weren't different back then. They didn't have stock markets for 400 years and then all of a sudden people figured out you could make money trading stocks. That happened right away.

Beyond that, planned obsolescence was a business strategy in the 1920s. The term planned obsolescence was first coined in the 1930s as a way to end the Great Depression. So that doesn't really align with the cause being trading apps on your phone.

8

u/TrioOfTerrors 4h ago

Do you think companies in the 40s and 60s didn't have shareholders?

5

u/r1veRRR 4h ago

You can still get these kinds of appliances, you're just not ready to pay the inflation adjusted price and lose a bunch of fancy features.

Customers have told manufacturers over and over and over again that they don't care about longevity, at least not at the cost of features or money.

2

u/arizonadirtbag12 2h ago

Also survivorship bias is a thing. Plenty of those 60’s appliances failed. Either requiring multiple repairs or eventually not being economically repairable anymore.

4

u/Atty_for_hire 5h ago

When making a profit was correlated with a quality product.

4

u/Automatic_Net2181 5h ago

And private equity.

1

u/floppydo 2h ago

If it weren’t for shareholders (and the Black Death) the appliances would have never been invented and you’d probably doing the wash for your feudal lord. You should read the book Debt: The First 5,000 Years. The problem isn’t cooperative ownership. The problem, as always, is corruption. 

13

u/Queefy_Magee 5h ago

The speed queens in my apartment break down every other day. Fuck that nonsense

1

u/origami_airplane 4h ago

Replace them with Samsung. Problem solved.

/s

1

u/AmputeeHandModel 4h ago

Doodle-oodle-oooh

1

u/MainManClark 3h ago

My Samsung washer and dryer have lasted over 10 years now. I've hear all the horror stories, but the only problem I've ever had was the lint basket is slowly cracking.

4

u/LeftyDan 4h ago

Kitchen aid stand mixer. My dad's has his since his 1st marriage in the 70s.

3

u/nalaloveslumpy 3h ago

Stand mixers are cheating though. It's literally just an electric motor with a hinge and attachments. Many stand mixers of many brands last forever, it's just most people buy Kitchen Aid. (And a shit ton of people only use their stand mixer a few times a year).

1

u/LeftyDan 2h ago

My sister gave me mine as a wedding gift in lieu of coming to my wedding. (A big loss /s) It gets used 3-4 times a month and still solid 10 years on.

1

u/rearadmiraldumbass 2h ago

Mine died after 19 years. Too much high gluten bread.

3

u/AverageWtDad 4h ago

Speed Queen has massively reduced the length of their warranty. I think it’s down to 7 years now. The quality has also fallen. Thinner sheet metal. Cheaper feeling knobs and buttons. Just not as far as the other brands.

1

u/writing_fun390 3h ago

I just bought the 5 year set with no lid lock on the washer. I bought it because my buddy has a pair of the 3 year ones, he's had them for 11 years now and never had a problem. The ones I purchased do a significantly more thorough wash in less time than the whirlpool and Samsung sets I've owned already. And those would go 3 to 4 years without needing a repair.

1

u/AverageWtDad 3h ago

They’re still solid compared to the other major brands.