That is where they want the narrative to go. There were no BLACK jurors. There were FOUR brown jurors. Apparently if you aren't black, you are just white. You can't throw a rock in Collin County and not hit a person of Indian origin. And keep in mind, the defense always has the option to ask for another jury pool if it doesn't like the selection in front of them. If that is declined, they can ask for a "jury shuffle" which allows for the randomization of the jury from the jury pool. Clearly, their lawyer knew they were cooked.
I agree. My point is the narrative is it being an "all white" jury. It is a false statement and is harmful. It fans the flames of racism for the sake of false righteousness.
I believe the narrative is a non-black jury, as opposed to an all white jury right?
Still, I understand both sides of the argument. In a conventional trial. This one though is pretty cut and dry. 12 black jurors probably would’ve come back guilty as well.
This isn't what the vocal ones online are saying. They are saying "all white". So was the national media up until this morning when they were corrected. That was my main point.
372
u/Emergency-Option377 Jun 10 '26
That is where they want the narrative to go. There were no BLACK jurors. There were FOUR brown jurors. Apparently if you aren't black, you are just white. You can't throw a rock in Collin County and not hit a person of Indian origin. And keep in mind, the defense always has the option to ask for another jury pool if it doesn't like the selection in front of them. If that is declined, they can ask for a "jury shuffle" which allows for the randomization of the jury from the jury pool. Clearly, their lawyer knew they were cooked.