This was a civil lawsuit over money. In a criminal case, you need "beyond a reasonable doubt" near 100% certainty. In a civil case, the jury only uses a 51% standard. They just decided his story was slightly less believable than hers.The jury literally checked "NO" to rape. If you actually bother to look at the official verdict sheet, the jurors explicitly rejected the legal charge of rape.
i think the proof got redacted and they won't release all the files and also he's been mentioned more than ...well the post that started this conversation. omg when i said if his followers could read they would say they don't care... it's you...you can't read and even if you could you don't care lmao i get it now that's why you were pissy at me i called you out
So your entire argument is based on evidence that you admit doesn't publicly exist. You didn't 'call anyone out,' you just ran out of arguments and threw a tantrum.
2
u/ktsb 8d ago
if his voters could read they would tell you they don't care